How many of you approve living together relationships????

If we talk about Film Stars relationship and Normal Person relationship, then it is huge difference. Isn't it?

The difference is that everyone knows about film stars and nothing about his next door neighbor. So, it is easier for common person as long as he maintains privacy. Nobody sees marriage certificate or photographs of a couple living together. They are considered married, whether wedding ceremony performed or not. Moreover the ordinary person may not have significant property and may just be happy living together happily. Once I witnessed a TV show about a couple living together without formal marriage. They had even grown up children. The couple could not marry because of inability to meet expenses for wedding ceremony. I don't think that such couple may have any problem.

Yet, in many processes, marriage certificate is necessary.
Also, only a few couples are so....majority are not secure in their relationship

In living relation ship if one person leave the other then there will be nothing to fight against the other but if it is marriage then we can show marriage certificate or at least evidence that is people who attended the marriage or marriage video. So due to all these evidences they may not leave the other person.

and no family will let their children to work out living relation ship.

In living relation ship if one person leave the other then there will be nothing to fight against the other but if it is marriage then we can show marriage certificate or at least evidence that is people who attended the marriage or marriage video. So due to all these evidences they may not leave the other person.

and no family will let their children to work out living relation ship.

The live in relation emerge from the desire to have best of both worlds. Conjugal bliss with no responsibility is the cause of such relation.

Here is word of caution for women. If they are self supporting and are in relation on equal footing, this is okay. But if they are dependent- financially or otherwise- on the spouse, they must not risk live in relation. They should follow wedding rituals.

Though in India its still not acceptable..in other countries its approved and even common people involve in such relations... I don't think though we approve live-in relationship,it is difficult to maintain it for long time.
Regarding film stars relationships, I think there is no surprise to see them changing partners often....

Yes..fidelity in the relationship is its demerrit

Let me compare live in relation with other transactions. When you indulge in property, share transactions and enter in service, you do not depend on oral agreement. For your own sake, you insist on proper documentation. If you lend, you insist on evidence or security

I do not understand how a spouse actually a woman who hopes to depend on her husband can enter in a relation like marriage without any safeguard like formal wedding, photographs on the occasion ands collateral evidence.

Even then if they live together, they risk similarly as one lens money to a company without any receipt of documentary evidence just on trust.

In living relation ship if one person leave the other then there will be nothing to fight against the other but if it is marriage then we can show marriage certificate or at least evidence that is people who attended the marriage or marriage video. So due to all these evidences they may not leave the other person.

and no family will let their children to work out living relation ship.

The live in relation emerge from the desire to have best of both worlds. Conjugal bliss with no responsibility is the cause of such relation.

Here is word of caution for women. If they are self supporting and are in relation on equal footing, this is okay. But if they are dependent- financially or otherwise- on the spouse, they must not risk live in relation. They should follow wedding rituals.

Sir, now also you agree.....
One need to be more careful while entering into live together relationship than a married one...isn't it?????

In living relation ship if one person leave the other then there will be nothing to fight against the other but if it is marriage then we can show marriage certificate or at least evidence that is people who attended the marriage or marriage video. So due to all these evidences they may not leave the other person.

and no family will let their children to work out living relation ship.

The live in relation emerge from the desire to have best of both worlds. Conjugal bliss with no responsibility is the cause of such relation.

Here is word of caution for women. If they are self supporting and are in relation on equal footing, this is okay. But if they are dependent- financially or otherwise- on the spouse, they must not risk live in relation. They should follow wedding rituals.

Sir, now also you agree.....
One need to be more careful while entering into live together relationship than a married one...isn't it?????

I just mean that a woman who can deal with man on equal footing and does not depend on him financially and not concerned with share in his property can well afford live in relation. Most women depend on husbands for livelihood. They must never venture live in relation.

In living relation ship if one person leave the other then there will be nothing to fight against the other but if it is marriage then we can show marriage certificate or at least evidence that is people who attended the marriage or marriage video. So due to all these evidences they may not leave the other person.

and no family will let their children to work out living relation ship.

The live in relation emerge from the desire to have best of both worlds. Conjugal bliss with no responsibility is the cause of such relation.

Here is word of caution for women. If they are self supporting and are in relation on equal footing, this is okay. But if they are dependent- financially or otherwise- on the spouse, they must not risk live in relation. They should follow wedding rituals.

Sir, now also you agree.....
One need to be more careful while entering into live together relationship than a married one...isn't it?????

I just mean that a woman who can deal with man on equal footing and does not depend on him financially and not concerned with share in his property can well afford live in relation. Most women depend on husbands for livelihood. They must never venture live in relation.

Now more women are well-employed. That may be the reason why, more youngsters are choosing this options, particularly professionals. Isn't it?

Actually more and more people are trying to follow western culture that is evasive of taking responsibilities therefore, live-in culture is one easy way to get away from them and save complications if feeling like getting away from relation any time in future.

Living relationship has no security. It is not a secure relation ship. because if there is no authority on this relation ship then the partner has a chance to cheat the other partner by leaving in the middle of the life

I didn't get my answers yet.....

If people are not feeling secured then why are they going for such relations! In fact this relation ship is for bold and famous who do not subscribe to middle class mentality of fear, separation etc. They are beyond such small things, this is normal for them.

One Advani had live in relation with Rajesh Khanna. Now she is totally discarded and the lawfully wedded wife Dimple is so close even though she was away from Rajesh Khanna. This explains enough the hazards of live in relation. The main hazard is that live in relation is not socially recognized.[/quote]

That's the doubt I asked to clear in Rajesh Khanna Thread...
It's Anju Mahendra.....
Were they married or not?[/quote]

This is some Adwani. She has initiated action for share in property of Rajesh Khanna. At the time of last rites,Dimple did not allow her even to sit in the van saying that only family members could enter.[/quote]

It's not in Wikipedia.... :blink: :blink:
Let me search google to get more information[/quote]

She is Anita Adwani. Here is link:

http://in.omg.yahoo.com/news/rajesh-khanna-s-live-in-partner-sends-legal-notice-to-his-family-members.html[/quote]

But I think, she was not in a relationship with Khanna, when he married Dimple. Am I right sir?

It happened only after Dimple left him. Isn't it??? Till now, Rajesh Khanna and Dimple are not legally separated. If so, will Anita get benefits????[/quote]

He was having an affair with Anju Mahendru when he suddenly broke it off and married Dimple, After Dimple left, he was in relationship with Tina Munim, now Ambani![/quote]

You forgot to include Anita Adwani, the latest who was with him for last 8 years. I heard she is a niece of former Filipino president's wife. She is asking for claim etc. Akshay pushed her out of the truck carrying his dead body.

Where are my answers?????
Am really angry......

It is very dangerous culture. People are escaping from their responsibilities. :sick: :sick: :angry:

In our society no one would approve such relationship. :blink:

this is more like western culture which we are trying to adopt. :evil:

In our society no one would approve such relationship. :blink:

this is more like western culture which we are trying to adopt. :evil:

More Information Technology people used to follow this culture. This will affect their whole life. :sick: :sick:

In our society no one would approve such relationship. :blink:

this is more like western culture which we are trying to adopt. :evil:

More Information Technology people used to follow this culture. This will affect their whole life. :sick: :sick:

Not necessary only those there are many more people who you may not know. :blink: