It's true, live together relations are not approved in our society and it's a part of foreign culture. Indian culture believes in marriages and its life long existence. Also, the feeling of security it gives. Yet, new generation is more trending towards this status of living.
I have to agree ...such couples love each other sincerely. Yet, they are not ready to involve in the serious responsibilities of family life. They just want to understand each other better and find if, he/she is his best life partner or not. Also, they have some hidden intentions of break up if things won't work according to their expectations, which is not at all possible in a married life as divorce itself is a complicated procedure. If not, why are they fearing marriages????????
20 Replies
One Advani had live in relation with Rajesh Khanna. Now she is totally discarded and the lawfully wedded wife Dimple is so close even though she was away from Rajesh Khanna. This explains enough the hazards of live in relation. The main hazard is that live in relation is not socially recognized.[/quote]
That's the doubt I asked to clear in Rajesh Khanna Thread...
It's Anju Mahendra.....
Were they married or not?[/quote]
This is some Adwani. She has initiated action for share in property of Rajesh Khanna. At the time of last rites,Dimple did not allow her even to sit in the van saying that only family members could enter.[/quote]
It's not in Wikipedia.... :blink: :blink:
Let me search google to get more information[/quote]
She is Anita Adwani. Here is link:
http://in.omg.yahoo.com/news/rajesh-khanna-s-live-in-partner-sends-legal-notice-to-his-family-members.html[/quote]
But I think, she was not in a relationship with Khanna, when he married Dimple. Am I right sir?
It happened only after Dimple left him. Isn't it??? Till now, Rajesh Khanna and Dimple are not legally separated. If so, will Anita get benefits????[/quote]
He was having an affair with Anju Mahendru when he suddenly broke it off and married Dimple, After Dimple left, he was in relationship with Tina Munim, now Ambani![/quote]
You forgot to include Anita Adwani, the latest who was with him for last 8 years. I heard she is a niece of former Filipino president's wife. She is asking for claim etc. Akshay pushed her out of the truck carrying his dead body.
That's the doubt I asked to clear in Rajesh Khanna Thread...
It's Anju Mahendra.....
Were they married or not?[/quote]
This is some Adwani. She has initiated action for share in property of Rajesh Khanna. At the time of last rites,Dimple did not allow her even to sit in the van saying that only family members could enter.[/quote]
It's not in Wikipedia.... :blink: :blink:
Let me search google to get more information[/quote]
She is Anita Adwani. Here is link:
http://in.omg.yahoo.com/news/rajesh-khanna-s-live-in-partner-sends-legal-notice-to-his-family-members.html[/quote]
But I think, she was not in a relationship with Khanna, when he married Dimple. Am I right sir?
It happened only after Dimple left him. Isn't it??? Till now, Rajesh Khanna and Dimple are not legally separated. If so, will Anita get benefits????[/quote]
He was having an affair with Anju Mahendru when he suddenly broke it off and married Dimple, After Dimple left, he was in relationship with Tina Munim, now Ambani![/quote]
You forgot to include Anita Adwani, the latest who was with him for last 8 years. I heard she is a niece of former Filipino president's wife. She is asking for claim etc. Akshay pushed her out of the truck carrying his dead body.
In our society no one would approve such relationship. :blink:
this is more like western culture which we are trying to adopt. :evil:
More Information Technology people used to follow this culture. This will affect their whole life. :sick: :sick:
Not necessary only those there are many more people who you may not know. :blink:
It is very dangerous culture. People are escaping from their responsibilities. :sick: :sick: :angry:
Not really able to understand what you mean to imply. Mary, when you reply to any post, make sure you clearly say what you mean, it is very difficult to decipher most of your posts! :blink:
What can be dangerous in such relationships any more than the evil practices we pass off in the name of our culture?? Burning brides for dowry in legitimate marriages? Aren't they more dangerous than anything else?
I think the decision of living in together lies completely on the individual but one should only go with the step if his/her parents approve of it as ultimately it is the society you have to live in and must adopt a living that is cultured enough.
Of you go by parents', relatives', society's views, live in relation is not feasible. This is like a thief seeking permission from police for theft.
I think the decision of living in together lies completely on the individual but one should only go with the step if his/her parents approve of it as ultimately it is the society you have to live in and must adopt a living that is cultured enough.
Of you go by parents', relatives', society's views, live in relation is not feasible. This is like a thief seeking permission from police for theft.
There are many who approve and are fast adopting the western culture. Though its still a hush hush topic in the society but some parents do allow their kids after they are engaged or are sure that their child will ultimately marry the live in partner.
There is no question of anyone approving or not approving a personal issue ! Living together is one such issue and it is best left to the individuals concerned to sort it out...They have to take responsibility for their actions ! And, India has always had such relationships right from the vedic times - only it was termed differently and done in a stealthy manner.At least now people are open about it and go about it in a more organised manner...
There is no question of anyone approving or not approving a personal issue ! Living together is one such issue and it is best left to the individuals concerned to sort it out...They have to take responsibility for their actions ! And, India has always had such relationships right from the vedic times - only it was termed differently and done in a stealthy manner.At least now people are open about it and go about it in a more organised manner...
That is what I have been maintaining all the time! We follow a lot of practices that can hardly be termed as good or cultured, in the name of various rites, in the institution of marriages and yet we turn quite prim and proper upon the mention of something like live-in relations, I think it is all absurd! Let people who live in such relationships take the decision of what they want and how they want to live! Not for us to make!
There is no question of anyone approving or not approving a personal issue ! Living together is one such issue and it is best left to the individuals concerned to sort it out...They have to take responsibility for their actions ! And, India has always had such relationships right from the vedic times - only it was termed differently and done in a stealthy manner.At least now people are open about it and go about it in a more organised manner...
That is what I have been maintaining all the time! We follow a lot of practices that can hardly be termed as good or cultured, in the name of various rites, in the institution of marriages and yet we turn quite prim and proper upon the mention of something like live-in relations, I think it is all absurd! Let people who live in such relationships take the decision of what they want and how they want to live! Not for us to make!
Exactly ! The institution of marriage in itself is full of loopholes and women are the worst sufferers and yet when a woman sees another woman doing things differently and being able to take independent decisions she is termed as being Characterless ? I wonder what that term really means ?
There is no question of anyone approving or not approving a personal issue ! Living together is one such issue and it is best left to the individuals concerned to sort it out...They have to take responsibility for their actions ! And, India has always had such relationships right from the vedic times - only it was termed differently and done in a stealthy manner.At least now people are open about it and go about it in a more organised manner...
That is what I have been maintaining all the time! We follow a lot of practices that can hardly be termed as good or cultured, in the name of various rites, in the institution of marriages and yet we turn quite prim and proper upon the mention of something like live-in relations, I think it is all absurd! Let people who live in such relationships take the decision of what they want and how they want to live! Not for us to make!
Exactly ! The institution of marriage in itself is full of loopholes and women are the worst sufferers and yet when a woman sees another woman doing things differently and being able to take independent decisions she is termed as being Characterless ? I wonder what that term really means ?
Well, the word character has actually lost its meaning or has been twisted as per the user's convenience! A good character means integrity, honesty, sincerity and etc. etc. but such people judge others' characters by their proximity or relationship with people of opposite sex! :blink: And what such women fail to see the obvious that while they are busy judging other women or girls, their husbands and boyfriends may be engaged eying other girls lecherously!!! :unsure:
Topic Author
S
Sandhya Rani
@Sandhya Rani
Topic Stats
Created
Monday, 16 July 2012 13:59
Last Updated
Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies
0
Views
2.5K
Likes
0