Not surprising to me, seeing that congress government is responsible for the most number of scams, she has to be such stinking rich! Give them a few more years and she will top the list! :blink:

The report is not convincing and also baseless. There are many other reports that show lesser wealth or income. The report is also based on input from some other site. All this makes no sense.

TOI reprinted the report published in Huffingtonpost, known for its authenticity. Earlier the same site reported from the Forbes about the world's richest in all spheres, which is another reliable source.

Not surprising to me, seeing that congress government is responsible for the most number of scams, she has to be such stinking rich! Give them a few more years and she will top the list! :blink:

The report is not convincing and also baseless. There are many other reports that show lesser wealth or income. The report is also based on input from some other site. All this makes no sense.

TOI reprinted the report published in Huffingtonpost, known for its authenticity. Earlier the same site reported from the Forbes about the world's richest in all spheres, which is another reliable source.

All these 'reliable' sources give different figures. Accordingly, all these are 'mere gossip and unreliable.'

Not surprising to me, seeing that congress government is responsible for the most number of scams, she has to be such stinking rich! Give them a few more years and she will top the list! :blink:

The report is not convincing and also baseless. There are many other reports that show lesser wealth or income. The report is also based on input from some other site. All this makes no sense.

TOI reprinted the report published in Huffingtonpost, known for its authenticity. Earlier the same site reported from the Forbes about the world's richest in all spheres, which is another reliable source.

All these 'reliable' sources give different figures. Accordingly, all these are 'mere gossip and unreliable.'

Well I don't have anything to say. I honor your opinion.

Not surprising to me, seeing that congress government is responsible for the most number of scams, she has to be such stinking rich! Give them a few more years and she will top the list! :blink:

The report is not convincing and also baseless. There are many other reports that show lesser wealth or income. The report is also based on input from some other site. All this makes no sense.

TOI reprinted the report published in Huffingtonpost, known for its authenticity. Earlier the same site reported from the Forbes about the world's richest in all spheres, which is another reliable source.

All these 'reliable' sources give different figures. Accordingly, all these are 'mere gossip and unreliable.'

Well I don't have anything to say. I honor your opinion.

Thank you. Now see the following link. Huffigton Post has asked for pardon and removed name of Sonia gandhi from the list.

http://www.jagran.com/news/national-huffington-post-delets-sonias-name-after-controversy-10907671.html?src=p1

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

In the print media this news is there, which is to be believed, still there is no clarity.

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.