This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

But, for us, there is no option left but to believe the media. Iknow Forbes and Huffington post are reputed sites. But our media is repeateddy saying that Huffington post has withdrawn the name of Sonia after the protests of Manish tewari from congress

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

But, for us, there is no option left but to believe the media. Iknow Forbes and Huffington post are reputed sites. But our media is repeateddy saying that Huffington post has withdrawn the name of Sonia after the protests of Manish tewari from congress

There ! you have got it ...The congress party would see to it that such a news gets thwarted but question yourself? how can a reputated post like Huffington go so wrong ? dont they have any ethics or a repautation to maintain ? they do..they must have bowed down before pressure from someone higher up in the USA since this is also political and many other things come into force here ...

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

If they can get the US authorities to release her son who was caught red-handed carrying large amounts of illegal foreign currency then it is not a big deal to get a mere newspaper retract their claims and apologise!

And whatever proof may or may not exist as to her being owner of the largest treasure in the world, but it still does not take a fool to realise the amounts that have been involved in the various corruptions and scams and seeing the enormity of such corruptions, it is extremely hard to believe that she is not involved. It would take an extremely gullible person to believe that she is not involved in all that! There is bound to be money in her name, and not just any amount, but tonnes of it!

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

If they can get the US authorities to release her son who was caught red-handed carrying large amounts of illegal foreign currency then it is not a big deal to get a mere newspaper retract their claims and apologise!

And whatever proof may or may not exist as to her being owner of the largest treasure in the world, but it still does not take a fool to realise the amounts that have been involved in the various corruptions and scams and seeing the enormity of such corruptions, it is extremely hard to believe that she is not involved. It would take an extremely gullible person to believe that she is not involved in all that! There is bound to be money in her name, and not just any amount, but tonnes of it!

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

If they can get the US authorities to release her son who was caught red-handed carrying large amounts of illegal foreign currency then it is not a big deal to get a mere newspaper retract their claims and apologise!

And whatever proof may or may not exist as to her being owner of the largest treasure in the world, but it still does not take a fool to realise the amounts that have been involved in the various corruptions and scams and seeing the enormity of such corruptions, it is extremely hard to believe that she is not involved. It would take an extremely gullible person to believe that she is not involved in all that! There is bound to be money in her name, and not just any amount, but tonnes of it!

I simply can't understand what prevents her from filing a defamation suit with suitable damages to challenge this so-called lie or fabrication!!!