Sonia Gandhi richer than Queen Elizabeth !!!!

Not surprising to me, seeing that congress government is responsible for the most number of scams, she has to be such stinking rich! Give them a few more years and she will top the list! :blink:

The report is not convincing and also baseless. There are many other reports that show lesser wealth or income. The report is also based on input from some other site. All this makes no sense.

TOI reprinted the report published in Huffingtonpost, known for its authenticity. Earlier the same site reported from the Forbes about the world's richest in all spheres, which is another reliable source.

All these 'reliable' sources give different figures. Accordingly, all these are 'mere gossip and unreliable.'

Not surprising to me, seeing that congress government is responsible for the most number of scams, she has to be such stinking rich! Give them a few more years and she will top the list! :blink:

The report is not convincing and also baseless. There are many other reports that show lesser wealth or income. The report is also based on input from some other site. All this makes no sense.

TOI reprinted the report published in Huffingtonpost, known for its authenticity. Earlier the same site reported from the Forbes about the world's richest in all spheres, which is another reliable source.

All these 'reliable' sources give different figures. Accordingly, all these are 'mere gossip and unreliable.'

Well I don't have anything to say. I honor your opinion.

Not surprising to me, seeing that congress government is responsible for the most number of scams, she has to be such stinking rich! Give them a few more years and she will top the list! :blink:

The report is not convincing and also baseless. There are many other reports that show lesser wealth or income. The report is also based on input from some other site. All this makes no sense.

TOI reprinted the report published in Huffingtonpost, known for its authenticity. Earlier the same site reported from the Forbes about the world's richest in all spheres, which is another reliable source.

All these 'reliable' sources give different figures. Accordingly, all these are 'mere gossip and unreliable.'

Well I don't have anything to say. I honor your opinion.

Thank you. Now see the following link. Huffigton Post has asked for pardon and removed name of Sonia gandhi from the list.

http://www.jagran.com/news/national-huffington-post-delets-sonias-name-after-controversy-10907671.html?src=p1

Not surprising to me, seeing that congress government is responsible for the most number of scams, she has to be such stinking rich! Give them a few more years and she will top the list! :blink:

The report is not convincing and also baseless. There are many other reports that show lesser wealth or income. The report is also based on input from some other site. All this makes no sense.

TOI reprinted the report published in Huffingtonpost, known for its authenticity. Earlier the same site reported from the Forbes about the world's richest in all spheres, which is another reliable source.

All these 'reliable' sources give different figures. Accordingly, all these are 'mere gossip and unreliable.'

Well I don't have anything to say. I honor your opinion.

Thank you. Now see the following link. Huffigton Post has asked for pardon and removed name of Sonia gandhi from the list.

http://www.jagran.com/news/national-huffington-post-delets-sonias-name-after-controversy-10907671.html?src=p1

विवाद के बाद हफिंगटन पोस्ट ने मांगी माफी, हटाया सोनिया का नाम
Thank you. I read the post.you cleared my doubt.

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

In the print media this news is there, which is to be believed, still there is no clarity.

In the print media this news is there, which is to be believed, still there is no clarity.

Regional news channels and their websites published the news, saying that Huffington post has withdrawn the name of Sonia from the list.

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

As long as Congress party is in ower they will protect the woman in question and will arm twist anyone and everyone who would show her in poor light and thats what is happening now...

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

If it is true, then ours media is not free, as it is perceived to be, in a healthy and mature democracy (65yrs) a free media which is considered to be the fourth pillars and custodians of constitution apart from judiciary, is not in its right path.

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

But, for us, there is no option left but to believe the media. Iknow Forbes and Huffington post are reputed sites. But our media is repeateddy saying that Huffington post has withdrawn the name of Sonia after the protests of Manish tewari from congress

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

But, for us, there is no option left but to believe the media. Iknow Forbes and Huffington post are reputed sites. But our media is repeateddy saying that Huffington post has withdrawn the name of Sonia after the protests of Manish tewari from congress

There ! you have got it ...The congress party would see to it that such a news gets thwarted but question yourself? how can a reputated post like Huffington go so wrong ? dont they have any ethics or a repautation to maintain ? they do..they must have bowed down before pressure from someone higher up in the USA since this is also political and many other things come into force here ...

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

But, for us, there is no option left but to believe the media. Iknow Forbes and Huffington post are reputed sites. But our media is repeateddy saying that Huffington post has withdrawn the name of Sonia after the protests of Manish tewari from congress

There ! you have got it ...The congress party would see to it that such a news gets thwarted but question yourself? how can a reputated post like Huffington go so wrong ? dont they have any ethics or a repautation to maintain ? they do..they must have bowed down before pressure from someone higher up in the USA since this is also political and many other things come into force here ...

Yes, it made me think. But unable to come to definitive conclusion.

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

If they can get the US authorities to release her son who was caught red-handed carrying large amounts of illegal foreign currency then it is not a big deal to get a mere newspaper retract their claims and apologise!

And whatever proof may or may not exist as to her being owner of the largest treasure in the world, but it still does not take a fool to realise the amounts that have been involved in the various corruptions and scams and seeing the enormity of such corruptions, it is extremely hard to believe that she is not involved. It would take an extremely gullible person to believe that she is not involved in all that! There is bound to be money in her name, and not just any amount, but tonnes of it!

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

If they can get the US authorities to release her son who was caught red-handed carrying large amounts of illegal foreign currency then it is not a big deal to get a mere newspaper retract their claims and apologise!

And whatever proof may or may not exist as to her being owner of the largest treasure in the world, but it still does not take a fool to realise the amounts that have been involved in the various corruptions and scams and seeing the enormity of such corruptions, it is extremely hard to believe that she is not involved. It would take an extremely gullible person to believe that she is not involved in all that! There is bound to be money in her name, and not just any amount, but tonnes of it!

The swiss bank accounts released last year of various politicians holding money in their banks have already shown that she has 1600 crores in their account which seems like a pittance now compared to this...

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

If they can get the US authorities to release her son who was caught red-handed carrying large amounts of illegal foreign currency then it is not a big deal to get a mere newspaper retract their claims and apologise!

And whatever proof may or may not exist as to her being owner of the largest treasure in the world, but it still does not take a fool to realise the amounts that have been involved in the various corruptions and scams and seeing the enormity of such corruptions, it is extremely hard to believe that she is not involved. It would take an extremely gullible person to believe that she is not involved in all that! There is bound to be money in her name, and not just any amount, but tonnes of it!

I simply can't understand what prevents her from filing a defamation suit with suitable damages to challenge this so-called lie or fabrication!!!

This is as expected...The congree party must have arm twisted the huffington post to aplogise, since when the same paper when it had oublished a report on her in 2011 about her rise to power and applauding her they had no complaints about it and the same congress men called it a rag now....

I'm confused. But the news was published by Dainik Jaagaran, a reputed paper. Which paper has to be believed ?
But yahoo news is still carrying this news about Sonia's riches.

If not satisfied with dainkik Jagran, see:

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-huffington-post-edits-report-puts-footnote-stating-sonia-gandhi-s-name-has-been-removed-from-rich-list-1928180

no. Need of verifying . Regional media also publishing this about Sonia.

This is something on expected lines...Congress would never let any such news leak out and when it does makes sure that it gets sliced off immediately..

If they can get the US authorities to release her son who was caught red-handed carrying large amounts of illegal foreign currency then it is not a big deal to get a mere newspaper retract their claims and apologise!

And whatever proof may or may not exist as to her being owner of the largest treasure in the world, but it still does not take a fool to realise the amounts that have been involved in the various corruptions and scams and seeing the enormity of such corruptions, it is extremely hard to believe that she is not involved. It would take an extremely gullible person to believe that she is not involved in all that! There is bound to be money in her name, and not just any amount, but tonnes of it!

I simply can't understand what prevents her from filing a defamation suit with suitable damages to challenge this so-called lie or fabrication!!!

Thats excatly what I was thinking,may be the Congress party which is known for its arrogance thinks that they dont need to bother about it since people will accept them at their face value...If they read some of the comments they will realise how wrong they are..