Chinese believe that Indians are the only people in the world, who do not mind losing their territory. Former union minister Arun Shourie, while delivering a lecture at the Manthan Samwaad in Hyderabad says, China claims a territory first Repeats it again and again. Finally grabs the territory.
That’s what happened with Aksai Chin.
Don’t you think its high time for India to seek new alliances to pursue our own National interests?
Don't you think, India needs a Lion not a Lamb to lead it ?
20 Replies
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
Its ok. Its obvious that you are satisfied to see north India as a big chunk known as CONI, China occupied north India. SLOEI, Sri lanka occupied east India and POTN, Pak occupied Tamil nadu so on so forth. Of course your Lamb leaders will make your dreams a reality very soon,
So you think that India should go for war against Pakistan, China and Sri Lanka. That's fine with me as long as I don't care about the 1.21 billion population of India. A war entirely collapses the economy of a nation. The other nations are just trying to tempt us to go for a war. This is just a trap. We have to wait. If China or Pakistan strike with a full force military, then we can strike back. If we had a tiger as our PM, he would have given in for this little temptation and would have started a fatal and never ending war. So I again say that I am happy with the lamb who doesn't fall in a trap just by a little temptation.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
Its ok. Its obvious that you are satisfied to see north India as a big chunk known as CONI, China occupied north India. SLOEI, Sri lanka occupied east India and POTN, Pak occupied Tamil nadu so on so forth. Of course your Lamb leaders will make your dreams a reality very soon,
So you think that India should go for war against Pakistan, China and Sri Lanka. That's fine with me as long as I don't care about the 1.21 billion population of India. A war entirely collapses the economy of a nation. The other nations are just trying to tempt us to go for a war. This is just a trap. We have to wait. If China or Pakistan strike with a full force military, then we can strike back. If we had a tiger as our PM, he would have given in for this little temptation and would have started a fatal and never ending war. So I again say that I am happy with the lamb who doesn't fall in a trap just by a little temptation.
Remember all major wars started with minor skirmishes. Neither China nor Pakistan started wars with all of its forces. For many years the then lambs neglected these skirmishes that led to losing big chunks of India. What do you think POK is ?. Its a testimonial for our able Lamb leadership. What do you think of Acsaichin is ?Its the testimonial for lamb leadership who firmly believed in outdated Panch sheel.
Nothing comes and falls in you lap unless you fight .Its of everybody's knowledge that a country in war should be prepared for losses if it wants to retain its sovereignty. Do you think the war forced by Hitler on countries are not aware of the loss of lives and property ?
If you want to safeguard your sovereignty you should fight for it. Otherwise be prepared for slavery.
You cannot have the cake and eat it too.
Well If you have faith in Lamb leadership, its your choice and prerogative.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
Its ok. Its obvious that you are satisfied to see north India as a big chunk known as CONI, China occupied north India. SLOEI, Sri lanka occupied east India and POTN, Pak occupied Tamil nadu so on so forth. Of course your Lamb leaders will make your dreams a reality very soon,
So you think that India should go for war against Pakistan, China and Sri Lanka. That's fine with me as long as I don't care about the 1.21 billion population of India. A war entirely collapses the economy of a nation. The other nations are just trying to tempt us to go for a war. This is just a trap. We have to wait. If China or Pakistan strike with a full force military, then we can strike back. If we had a tiger as our PM, he would have given in for this little temptation and would have started a fatal and never ending war. So I again say that I am happy with the lamb who doesn't fall in a trap just by a little temptation.
Remember all major wars started with minor skirmishes. Neither China nor Pakistan started wars with all of its forces. For many years the then lambs neglected these skirmishes that led to losing big chunks of India. What do you think POK is ?. Its a testimonial for our able Lamb leadership. What do you think of Acsaichin is ?Its the testimonial for lamb leadership who firmly believed in outdated Panch sheel.
Nothing comes and falls in you lap unless you fight .Its of everybody's knowledge that a country in war should be prepared for losses if it wants to retain its sovereignty. Do you think the war forced by Hitler on countries are not aware of the loss of lives and property ?
If you want to safeguard your sovereignty you should fight for it. Otherwise be prepared for slavery.
You cannot have the cake and eat it too.
Well If you have faith in Lamb leadership, its your choice and prerogative.
So your suggestion is that we invade China or Pakistan and start a full fledged war? War is evil. Innumerable soldiers and innocent people are killed. Money is wasted. There will be total destruction. War should be considered only as a last resort. What is the use of showing our supreme power by giving up our integrity? Do you think starting a war is moral? We don't need to fight. We just have to defend ourselves. That is what we are doing now. If there is a major war, we can face that at that time.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
Its ok. Its obvious that you are satisfied to see north India as a big chunk known as CONI, China occupied north India. SLOEI, Sri lanka occupied east India and POTN, Pak occupied Tamil nadu so on so forth. Of course your Lamb leaders will make your dreams a reality very soon,
So you think that India should go for war against Pakistan, China and Sri Lanka. That's fine with me as long as I don't care about the 1.21 billion population of India. A war entirely collapses the economy of a nation. The other nations are just trying to tempt us to go for a war. This is just a trap. We have to wait. If China or Pakistan strike with a full force military, then we can strike back. If we had a tiger as our PM, he would have given in for this little temptation and would have started a fatal and never ending war. So I again say that I am happy with the lamb who doesn't fall in a trap just by a little temptation.
Remember all major wars started with minor skirmishes. Neither China nor Pakistan started wars with all of its forces. For many years the then lambs neglected these skirmishes that led to losing big chunks of India. What do you think POK is ?. Its a testimonial for our able Lamb leadership. What do you think of Acsaichin is ?Its the testimonial for lamb leadership who firmly believed in outdated Panch sheel.
Nothing comes and falls in you lap unless you fight .Its of everybody's knowledge that a country in war should be prepared for losses if it wants to retain its sovereignty. Do you think the war forced by Hitler on countries are not aware of the loss of lives and property ?
If you want to safeguard your sovereignty you should fight for it. Otherwise be prepared for slavery.
You cannot have the cake and eat it too.
Well If you have faith in Lamb leadership, its your choice and prerogative.
So your suggestion is that we invade China or Pakistan and start a full fledged war? War is evil. Innumerable soldiers and innocent people are killed. Money is wasted. There will be total destruction. War should be considered only as a last resort. What is the use of showing our supreme power by giving up our integrity? Do you think starting a war is moral? We don't need to fight. We just have to defend ourselves. That is what we are doing now. If there is a major war, we can face that at that time.
Yes, if war is forced on India and provokes it, India should show them the place where they belong to. India should make the world know that it means business. Offence is the best form of defense. War is not new to India. It knows the pros and cons of war.Show an open hand to your friend. Show a fist to your enemy.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
Its ok. Its obvious that you are satisfied to see north India as a big chunk known as CONI, China occupied north India. SLOEI, Sri lanka occupied east India and POTN, Pak occupied Tamil nadu so on so forth. Of course your Lamb leaders will make your dreams a reality very soon,
Nobody says that we should not defend our borders. I feel that Adityaa only warns against war hysteria and jingoism which is counter productive.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
Its ok. Its obvious that you are satisfied to see north India as a big chunk known as CONI, China occupied north India. SLOEI, Sri lanka occupied east India and POTN, Pak occupied Tamil nadu so on so forth. Of course your Lamb leaders will make your dreams a reality very soon,
Nobody says that we should not defend our borders. I feel that Adityaa only warns against war hysteria and jingoism which is counter productive.
India is anything but a war mongering country. I'd have been the happiest had India been a war inviting country.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
Its ok. Its obvious that you are satisfied to see north India as a big chunk known as CONI, China occupied north India. SLOEI, Sri lanka occupied east India and POTN, Pak occupied Tamil nadu so on so forth. Of course your Lamb leaders will make your dreams a reality very soon,
Nobody says that we should not defend our borders. I feel that Adityaa only warns against war hysteria and jingoism which is counter productive.
India is anything but a war mongering country. I'd have been the happiest had India been a war inviting country.
We have seen fate of Nazi and fascists. War hysteria never helps. We must work for peace but be prepared for war. It is necessary to build military strength. If you are strong, you are safe and there will be no war.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
Its ok. Its obvious that you are satisfied to see north India as a big chunk known as CONI, China occupied north India. SLOEI, Sri lanka occupied east India and POTN, Pak occupied Tamil nadu so on so forth. Of course your Lamb leaders will make your dreams a reality very soon,
Nobody says that we should not defend our borders. I feel that Adityaa only warns against war hysteria and jingoism which is counter productive.
India is anything but a war mongering country. I'd have been the happiest had India been a war inviting country.
We have seen fate of Nazi and fascists. War hysteria never helps. We must work for peace but be prepared for war. It is necessary to build military strength. If you are strong, you are safe and there will be no war.
We have seen Nazis and we have seen the outcome. Now you tell me India at any time in the modern times initiated a war ? India lacks that war hysteria and expansionism.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
Its ok. Its obvious that you are satisfied to see north India as a big chunk known as CONI, China occupied north India. SLOEI, Sri lanka occupied east India and POTN, Pak occupied Tamil nadu so on so forth. Of course your Lamb leaders will make your dreams a reality very soon,
Nobody says that we should not defend our borders. I feel that Adityaa only warns against war hysteria and jingoism which is counter productive.
India is anything but a war mongering country. I'd have been the happiest had India been a war inviting country.
We have seen fate of Nazi and fascists. War hysteria never helps. We must work for peace but be prepared for war. It is necessary to build military strength. If you are strong, you are safe and there will be no war.
We have seen Nazis and we have seen the outcome. Now you tell me India at any time in the modern times initiated a war ? India lacks that war hysteria and expansionism.
The forces that support war hysteria have not been in power in India in the recent period. The latest posts in the thread are just a sequel to the post by Adityaa who warned against war frenzy. There are undoubtedly many who would create undue conflicts not only abroad but also internally if they had their way.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
You dont need to necessarily go for war to show your strength ! That is just flexing muscle without responsibility. If we show that we are a disciplined country capable of dealing with internal problems and problem of terrorism and be firm with both Pakistan and China when it is necessary , I am sure they would have more respect for us as a patriotic nation that is capable of taking care of its borders and its people.
But that is not the case - We have scams galore, our politicians and even citizens help the anti socials and terrorists to operate from here otherwise they would not be here striking so many times ( look how the american citizens react even to sikhs because of one incident of bombing). Last of all our leaders are a joke only worried about their immediate gains unlike Chinese leaders who are patriotic ! First of all we need to get our house in order to gain any respect or recognition as a country that cannot be taken for granted !
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
Its ok. Its obvious that you are satisfied to see north India as a big chunk known as CONI, China occupied north India. SLOEI, Sri lanka occupied east India and POTN, Pak occupied Tamil nadu so on so forth. Of course your Lamb leaders will make your dreams a reality very soon,
Nobody says that we should not defend our borders. I feel that Adityaa only warns against war hysteria and jingoism which is counter productive.
India is anything but a war mongering country. I'd have been the happiest had India been a war inviting country.
We have seen fate of Nazi and fascists. War hysteria never helps. We must work for peace but be prepared for war. It is necessary to build military strength. If you are strong, you are safe and there will be no war.
We have seen Nazis and we have seen the outcome. Now you tell me India at any time in the modern times initiated a war ? India lacks that war hysteria and expansionism.
The forces that support war hysteria have not been in power in India in the recent period. The latest posts in the thread are just a sequel to the post by Adityaa who warned against war frenzy. There are undoubtedly many who would create undue conflicts not only abroad but also internally if they had their way.
The word war frenzy is unsuitable here. What Arun Shourie and I and subsequent members said was to give a befitting reply to the provocators. No body meant to declare a war against China. Lack of such befitting actions speak loudly about our weakness and submissiveness.
I am sure what they believe is right. If India does not care for the territory that Pakistan has been occupying for years on end now, that is what gave Chinese the courage to intrude into India. Had Nepal, Sri Lanka and other neighboring were bigger than India, even they would have done so. What do you think?
It is a case of 'Garib ki bibi sab ki bhabi'. Any one can try to act smart with a weak person's beautiful wife who cannot safeguard his wife. Our politicians are too weak to act and take proper action therefore countries which could have our good friends and true allies are acting the way they are. The need is to show strong character on our paart to show them their right place where they belong, we are not weak as a country.
Are we or our politcians weak? Certainly not. They are corrupt. They don't care even if our jawans are getting gunned down in the most horrific ways. I won't blame China or Pakistan if they are trying to act smart. Because for them, as you said, India is a beautiful wife whom they are trying to physically exploit.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
I agree with you, we should rather meekly surrender and invite them offering them keys to our cities and states to avoid wars. After all wars are not fought by gentlemen or good countries. Wars are for uncivilized and barbarous. After all we follow the culture that says if someone hits at your one cheek, offer him another to satisfy his ego. Cheers. Let us offer our territories to invaders and terrorists.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
I agree with you, we should rather meekly surrender and invite them offering them keys to our cities and states to avoid wars. After all wars are not fought by gentlemen or good countries. Wars are for uncivilized and barbarous. After all we follow the culture that says if someone hits at your one cheek, offer him another to satisfy his ego. Cheers. Let us offer our territories to invaders and terrorists.
We have to defend our borders and country. That doesn't mean we have to start wars. If some country invades ours, then we can fight back. No good country wastes its resources and energy in wars and battles.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
I agree with you, we should rather meekly surrender and invite them offering them keys to our cities and states to avoid wars. After all wars are not fought by gentlemen or good countries. Wars are for uncivilized and barbarous. After all we follow the culture that says if someone hits at your one cheek, offer him another to satisfy his ego. Cheers. Let us offer our territories to invaders and terrorists.
We have to defend our borders and country. That doesn't mean we have to start wars. If some country invades ours, then we can fight back. No good country wastes its resources and energy in wars and battles.
What you are going to do after a country invades you , except surrendering ? No good country will stand looking the fun of invasion. A self respecting and independent country uses all its resources to upkeep its sovereignty.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
I agree with you, we should rather meekly surrender and invite them offering them keys to our cities and states to avoid wars. After all wars are not fought by gentlemen or good countries. Wars are for uncivilized and barbarous. After all we follow the culture that says if someone hits at your one cheek, offer him another to satisfy his ego. Cheers. Let us offer our territories to invaders and terrorists.
We have to defend our borders and country. That doesn't mean we have to start wars. If some country invades ours, then we can fight back. No good country wastes its resources and energy in wars and battles.
What you are going to do after a country invades you , except surrendering ? No good country will stand looking the fun of invasion. A self respecting and independent country uses all its resources to upkeep its sovereignty.
Our country believes in defence and not war. That is why our forces are called 'defence forces' which are under 'Ministry of defence' . we don't have ministry of war. However, how our defence is more effective is a matter of strategy that is left to discretion of the armed forces. Sometimes, it is strategically necessary to attack although the aim is defence. This was done in 1965. India entered some vulnerable areas of Pakistan in order to demoralize the enemy. Defence strategy and war are secret matters that only the defence authorities can decide.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
I agree with you, we should rather meekly surrender and invite them offering them keys to our cities and states to avoid wars. After all wars are not fought by gentlemen or good countries. Wars are for uncivilized and barbarous. After all we follow the culture that says if someone hits at your one cheek, offer him another to satisfy his ego. Cheers. Let us offer our territories to invaders and terrorists.
We have to defend our borders and country. That doesn't mean we have to start wars. If some country invades ours, then we can fight back. No good country wastes its resources and energy in wars and battles.
What you are going to do after a country invades you , except surrendering ? No good country will stand looking the fun of invasion. A self respecting and independent country uses all its resources to upkeep its sovereignty.
Our country believes in defence and not war. That is why our forces are called 'defence forces' which are under 'Ministry of defence' . we don't have ministry of war. However, how our defence is more effective is a matter of strategy that is left to discretion of the armed forces. Sometimes, it is strategically necessary to attack although the aim is defence. This was done in 1965. India entered some vulnerable areas of Pakistan in order to demoralize the enemy. Defence strategy and war are secret matters that only the defence authorities can decide.
Its not necessary to know the secrets of defense strategies.What is necessary is to reply the provocations. Is it not happening in Kashmir sector ? Whenever there is an attempt to enter our territory, are we not retaliating ? The same should be done in every inch of the border
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
I agree with you, we should rather meekly surrender and invite them offering them keys to our cities and states to avoid wars. After all wars are not fought by gentlemen or good countries. Wars are for uncivilized and barbarous. After all we follow the culture that says if someone hits at your one cheek, offer him another to satisfy his ego. Cheers. Let us offer our territories to invaders and terrorists.
We have to defend our borders and country. That doesn't mean we have to start wars. If some country invades ours, then we can fight back. No good country wastes its resources and energy in wars and battles.
They are invading for decades, when are we going to fight back? Or if you think defending bravely and keep getting back is our style of handling the job, we have had enough.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
I agree with you, we should rather meekly surrender and invite them offering them keys to our cities and states to avoid wars. After all wars are not fought by gentlemen or good countries. Wars are for uncivilized and barbarous. After all we follow the culture that says if someone hits at your one cheek, offer him another to satisfy his ego. Cheers. Let us offer our territories to invaders and terrorists.
We have to defend our borders and country. That doesn't mean we have to start wars. If some country invades ours, then we can fight back. No good country wastes its resources and energy in wars and battles.
They are invading for decades, when are we going to fight back? Or if you think defending bravely and keep getting back is our style of handling the job, we have had enough.
But they haven't been able to capture a territory for decades. This shows that we have good defence. So there is really no necessary for offence. A country which doesn't care about its masses start wars and battles just by simple provocations. But India is not like that. And majority of Indian people also want to live in peace. Starting a war will not let us live in peace.
Everyone is just talking about the weakness of our politicians and their inability to go for a war. But you are not seeing the big picture. Starting a war is easy. But think about the outcome of a war. There will be loss of lives on both sides, properties will be damaged, there will be a huge blow to our economy etc. Our economy is not strong. China is triggering us for a war so that it can enjoy the economic collapse and the complete fall of India. We have to defend our territories. But that doesn't mean that we have to go for war against all countries which try to move some of their camps into our territory. We can find a solution for all territorial problems. But a solution doesn't come from war. Now I don't need a tiger as our PM. I am happy with the lamb.
I agree with you, we should rather meekly surrender and invite them offering them keys to our cities and states to avoid wars. After all wars are not fought by gentlemen or good countries. Wars are for uncivilized and barbarous. After all we follow the culture that says if someone hits at your one cheek, offer him another to satisfy his ego. Cheers. Let us offer our territories to invaders and terrorists.
We have to defend our borders and country. That doesn't mean we have to start wars. If some country invades ours, then we can fight back. No good country wastes its resources and energy in wars and battles.
They are invading for decades, when are we going to fight back? Or if you think defending bravely and keep getting back is our style of handling the job, we have had enough.
But they haven't been able to capture a territory for decades. This shows that we have good defence. So there is really no necessary for offence. A country which doesn't care about its masses start wars and battles just by simple provocations. But India is not like that. And majority of Indian people also want to live in peace. Starting a war will not let us live in peace.
I am not sure where do you collect your information from, but I would like to suggest you to please get a fresh update on invasions and territories we have already lost to foreign invaders. And what is simple provocation to some is serious matter of shame for others.
Topic Author
R
rambabu
@rambabu
Topic Stats
Created
Thursday, 03 October 2013 02:43
Last Updated
Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies
0
Views
2.7K
Likes
0