Was Indian Independence possible without partition? Was partition necessary?
I often think, If India has remained a single unit with Pakistan and Bangladesh combined, more than 50% problems of our country would have been solved. But very often, I feel that, it was better to give them their part, otherwise India would have been filled with terrorists. I don't know which one is the right option? But personally I feel that Partition was a wrong thing that happened 60 years ago. This single partition has really blurred the beauty of Indian independence. India as whole fought together for Independence and when they got it, they celebrated it in two ways, two days and in two colours. Though India fought for independence with the principle of non-violence, new dawn break gaining freedom witnessed only blood, violence and only violence!!!! What do you think?
Also was it not possible to gain independence without partition, even if it would have taken a little more time?
Also was it not possible to gain independence without partition, even if it would have taken a little more time?
Category: General Reference
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this question on other bookmarking websites.