I have seen many people wanting to have a National language for India. Right now. English is fulfilling that need although it is a foreign language. Will it be good to have a national language from one of the many Indian languages ? And if it is any other language other than your spoken language or mother tongue ,will you accept it ? If not give reasons..
8 Replies
It is good to continue with both the languages, as one has International influence and the other is related to the Nation. We should respect both the languages. But nowdays we are ignoring one language and giving more preference to other language. One reason is that English is necessary for every job whether it is Govt job or private job, but on the other hand Hindi is not necessary except a few cases.
usha manohar wrote:Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:rambabu wrote:Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:Hindi and Englisg bothcater to the need of link language. Hindi is spokenor understood in most parts of the country. English is also ised in entire country. May be invery remote area, English and Hindi both are not known. But mostly people don't go to such places. To elucidate, a North Indian may go to Shillong (Meghalaya) and can communicate in Hindi or English. Possibly, there would be many in adjoining villages knowing only local language. But an outsider is not likely to go there.
True sir. I stayed in many places and successfully able to interact with the people using either Hindi or English or both at times.
Then why we needto declare any language as national. Despite foreign origin, English is our national language just as Sonia Gandhi is our national leader. Although not declared national, anything used everywhere in nation is national.
There is no need to bring Sonia Gandhi into this since there are still quite a few question marks about her ? and to compare her to our national issue is not right since she has nothing to do with Indian languages ...
Sonia Gandhi is just an example. In fact, what we adopt become ours or Indian in spite of foreign origin. Similarly something of Indian origin if discarded is no more Indian. Sonia gandhi is a very much Indian leader in spite of her foreign origin. Another example: Hockey is our national game even though this is not of Indian origin. also while mentioning Sonia, I was not serious and this was in lighter vein.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:usha manohar wrote:Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:rambabu wrote:Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:Hindi and Englisg bothcater to the need of link language. Hindi is spokenor understood in most parts of the country. English is also ised in entire country. May be invery remote area, English and Hindi both are not known. But mostly people don't go to such places. To elucidate, a North Indian may go to Shillong (Meghalaya) and can communicate in Hindi or English. Possibly, there would be many in adjoining villages knowing only local language. But an outsider is not likely to go there.
True sir. I stayed in many places and successfully able to interact with the people using either Hindi or English or both at times.
Then why we needto declare any language as national. Despite foreign origin, English is our national language just as Sonia Gandhi is our national leader. Although not declared national, anything used everywhere in nation is national.
There is no need to bring Sonia Gandhi into this since there are still quite a few question marks about her ? and to compare her to our national issue is not right since she has nothing to do with Indian languages ...
Sonia Gandhi is just an example. In fact, what we adopt become ours or Indian in spite of foreign origin. Similarly something of Indian origin if discarded is no more Indian. Sonia gandhi is a very much Indian leader in spite of her foreign origin. Another example: Hockey is our national game even though this is not of Indian origin. also while mentioning Sonia, I was not serious and this was in lighter vein.
Point taken..
Topic Author
usha manohar
@kiran8
