Has BJP done well in these 4 years?

3.8K Views
0 Replies
1 min read

Has BJP done well in 4 years or only now results are coming through Scams, conversion of black money to white money in RBI, etc. Or is it just that it is a normal thing in our economy.

First Vijay Mallya, then Nirav Modi, then Jammu & Kashmir Companies evading taxes, then knowing that conversion of black money to white is still happening till 31-03-2018, then stock markets fluctuation, TDP backing its support & no confidence motion.

What is your opinion. Have these incidents come to light for our good to elect a new Party or BJP can be confided with for another term as in past 3 years everything went fine except job creation. What are your thoughts?

20 Replies

Arunima Singh wrote:

One thing for sure that he has guts to take tough decisions and not go for populist one. He has taken a big risk with GST which was there in discussion for a decade and never implemented. He might loose 2019 like Atalji but that doesn't make him an inefficient PM and neither was Atalji.

This is my personal view and one might differ. But if I am asked to name efficient PM of my country, I will definitely name Modi along with Atalji and Narsimha Rao. 

Yes ! he has guts to compromise the security of India by having the lowest defense budget of the GDP  ever since independence and reducing the requirement of 126 rafale planes to 36. Greatest Indian PM? 

MG Singh wrote:
anil wrote:
Arunima Singh wrote:

In Mahabharta while one wife of Pandu went for Sati, other one called Kunti lived a life of dignity. Mahabharata is a classic book which has all shades and nuances and a whole gamut of human sides..Nothing comes in black and white and there is a shade of grey.

I totally agree with Usha that Hinduism has been one of the most progressive religion and has undergone a lot of reforms.

May be it is only and only example in Mahabhar of Sati. No now that was situation at that time. But in Rajput community women used to be sati because it was their believe that we live life dignity so we also died with it. 

If Sati brought dignity than why was it stopped and equated with murder. Very sad that you are extolling such views which have no place in the civilized world.

I am not in favor of Sati tradition. It is evil. But I write here what I read in some books on Rajputs.

usha manohar wrote:
Arunima Singh wrote:

One thing for sure that he has guts to take tough decisions and not go for populist one. He has taken a big risk with GST which was there in discussion for a decade and never implemented. He might loose 2019 like Atalji but that doesn't make him an inefficient PM and neither was Atalji.

This is my personal view and one might differ. But if I am asked to name efficient PM of my country, I will definitely name Modi along with Atalji and Narsimha Rao. 

While there are many things wrong with BJP and It's leaders including Me Modi , there is no one who matches home in stature and commitment. However, BJP has to let go of certtain issues that don't really help the people or talkless about such issues and diaciibe the various firebrand leaders who shoot away without thinking , bringing down the image of the party.

These firebrand leader are in every party. For leader of parties it is not possible to control on tongue of all leaders. No doubt these are bringing down image of party.

One of the biggest blunder is the introduction of 2000 notes which raises eyebrows. High denomination notes are not good for economy and hence 500 & 1000 Notes were banned, then 2000 Note is brought. I still do not understand what was the purpose then! Introduction of 2000 Notes I believe has taken the belief out of demonitization. RBI data and everything shows nothing that Black money was detected.

epraneeth77 wrote:

One of the biggest blunder is the introduction of 2000 notes which raises eyebrows. High denomination notes are not good for economy and hence 500 & 1000 Notes were banned, then 2000 Note is brought. I still do not understand what was the purpose then! Introduction of 2000 Notes I believe has taken the belief out of demonitization. RBI data and everything shows nothing that Black money was detected.

I think I know the purpose. They will let the black money holders store them and suddenly ban the notes. That will solve the issue once for ever.

epraneeth77 wrote:

One of the biggest blunder is the introduction of 2000 notes which raises eyebrows. High denomination notes are not good for economy and hence 500 & 1000 Notes were banned, then 2000 Note is brought. I still do not understand what was the purpose then! Introduction of 2000 Notes I believe has taken the belief out of demonitization. RBI data and everything shows nothing that Black money was detected.

I am also thinking it that when 500 and 1000 notes were banned what is the purpose of 2000 note. It is news today that government slow down printing of 2000 note. Indeed higher demoniation note make easy to give and take bribe.

anil wrote:
epraneeth77 wrote:

One of the biggest blunder is the introduction of 2000 notes which raises eyebrows. High denomination notes are not good for economy and hence 500 & 1000 Notes were banned, then 2000 Note is brought. I still do not understand what was the purpose then! Introduction of 2000 Notes I believe has taken the belief out of demonitization. RBI data and everything shows nothing that Black money was detected.

I am also thinking it that when 500 and 1000 notes were banned what is the purpose of 2000 note. It is news today that government slow down printing of 2000 note. Indeed higher demoniation note make easy to give and take bribe.

Bribe is a bribe with any denomination as long as it is unaccounted for ...that was the whole purpose of demonetization.

 

usha manohar wrote:
anil wrote:
epraneeth77 wrote:

One of the biggest blunder is the introduction of 2000 notes which raises eyebrows. High denomination notes are not good for economy and hence 500 & 1000 Notes were banned, then 2000 Note is brought. I still do not understand what was the purpose then! Introduction of 2000 Notes I believe has taken the belief out of demonitization. RBI data and everything shows nothing that Black money was detected.

I am also thinking it that when 500 and 1000 notes were banned what is the purpose of 2000 note. It is news today that government slow down printing of 2000 note. Indeed higher demoniation note make easy to give and take bribe.

Bribe is a bribe with any denomination as long as it is unaccounted for ...that was the whole purpose of demonetization.

Yes but demonetisation did not stop or even lessen bribe giving. Demonetization is one of the reasons for Modi defeat in Hindi heartland. 

I wrote 2 years back that Modi will fail  and everybody was saying no and ridiculing Rahul.  It has happened and we await the route of Modi in north India. 

usha manohar wrote:
anil wrote:
epraneeth77 wrote:

One of the biggest blunder is the introduction of 2000 notes which raises eyebrows. High denomination notes are not good for economy and hence 500 & 1000 Notes were banned, then 2000 Note is brought. I still do not understand what was the purpose then! Introduction of 2000 Notes I believe has taken the belief out of demonitization. RBI data and everything shows nothing that Black money was detected.

I am also thinking it that when 500 and 1000 notes were banned what is the purpose of 2000 note. It is news today that government slow down printing of 2000 note. Indeed higher demoniation note make easy to give and take bribe.

Bribe is a bribe with any denomination as long as it is unaccounted for ...that was the whole purpose of demonetization.

But giving and taking bribe is easy in big denomination. Note of 2000 make it easy.

MG Singh wrote:

I wrote 2 years back that Modi will fail  and everybody was saying no and ridiculing Rahul.  It has happened and we await the route of Modi in north India. 

It is not fail but it is victory of corrupt system of country. Here in Rajasthan only and only Rajey is responsible for defeat of BJP.

anil wrote:
MG Singh wrote:

I wrote 2 years back that Modi will fail  and everybody was saying no and ridiculing Rahul.  It has happened and we await the route of Modi in north India. 

It is not fail but it is victory of corrupt system of country. Here in Rajasthan only and only Rajey is responsible for defeat of BJP.

We always find some reason or person for defeats or wins. Actually public looks for a change in the system or change the system.

suni51 wrote:
anil wrote:
MG Singh wrote:

I wrote 2 years back that Modi will fail  and everybody was saying no and ridiculing Rahul.  It has happened and we await the route of Modi in north India. 

It is not fail but it is victory of corrupt system of country. Here in Rajasthan only and only Rajey is responsible for defeat of BJP.

We always find some reason or person for defeats or wins. Actually public looks for a change in the system or change the system.

Who will change the system?, politicians, never, only and only public can change the system.

suni51 wrote:
anil wrote:
MG Singh wrote:

I wrote 2 years back that Modi will fail  and everybody was saying no and ridiculing Rahul.  It has happened and we await the route of Modi in north India. 

It is not fail but it is victory of corrupt system of country. Here in Rajasthan only and only Rajey is responsible for defeat of BJP.

We always find some reason or person for defeats or wins. Actually public looks for a change in the system or change the system.

Earlier Congress lost because of Ashok Gehlot and the many scams he and his govt was involved in. However , there were no such scams during g Vasundara Rajesh tenure , but she was obviously not popular and so lost and Gehlot is back again to loot some more ...

usha manohar wrote:
suni51 wrote:
anil wrote:
MG Singh wrote:

I wrote 2 years back that Modi will fail  and everybody was saying no and ridiculing Rahul.  It has happened and we await the route of Modi in north India. 

It is not fail but it is victory of corrupt system of country. Here in Rajasthan only and only Rajey is responsible for defeat of BJP.

We always find some reason or person for defeats or wins. Actually public looks for a change in the system or change the system.

Earlier Congress lost because of Ashok Gehlot and the many scams he and his govt was involved in. However , there were no such scams during g Vasundara Rajesh tenure , but she was obviously not popular and so lost and Gehlot is back again to loot some more ...

She is not innocent as you are thinking. I am giving here one example of corruption. In this May government lifted bane from transfer, Only and only one rule for transfer is to get desire of BJP workers. What it means, To get desire you have to pay the worker. Here price of transfer of teacher was Rs. 3 lacs.

I don't know how some persons keep on chirping that Congress is corrupt while BJP is clean. My inlaws are from MP and I regularly go there. Let me tell readers that Vijay Vergia now a top man in the BJP hierarchy was an ordinary trader with a small income and now he is a1000 crore man. Examine the life of Amit Shah and it will be an eye-opener. The only man personally not corrupt is Narendra Modi( But MMSingh was also personally clean). But both these have soiled their hands. Modi wanted funds for the party for coming elections hence his deal to hand over 35000crorese to Anil Ambani. Just like MM Singh. Till date, people like me have raised so many questions on the Rafale deal and there are no answers, only rhetoric. Not worth wasting my time in repeating them again. People have seen BJP rule for 4 years. How has the life of the common man changed?. In MP the strong hold of the BJP( now defeated) ruled for 15 years and over 18000 farmers committed suicide. Nothing to be proud of. I am a nationalist and my sight is clear. The BJP is worse than Congress.https://www.hindustantimes.com/bhopal/over-18-000-farmers-committed-suicide-in-mp-in-the-past-15-years/story-Y4cxfY8jwhOeeYeroRmMKK.html

MG Singh wrote:

I don't know how some persons keep on chirping that Congress is corrupt while BJP is clean. My inlaws are from MP and I regularly go there. Let me tell readers that Vijay Vergia now a top man in the BJP hierarchy was an ordinary trader with a small income and now he is a1000 crore man. Examine the life of Amit Shah and it will be an eye-opener. The only man personally not corrupt is Narendra Modi( But MMSingh was also personally clean). But both these have soiled their hands. Modi wanted funds for the party for coming elections hence his deal to hand over 35000crorese to Anil Ambani. Just like MM Singh. Till date, people like me have raised so many questions on the Rafale deal and there are no answers, only rhetoric. Not worth wasting my time in repeating them again. People have seen BJP rule for 4 years. How has the life of the common man changed?. In MP the strong hold of the BJP( now defeated) ruled for 15 years and over 18000 farmers committed suicide. Nothing to be proud of. I am a nationalist and my sight is clear. The BJP is worse than Congress.https://www.hindustantimes.com/bhopal/over-18-000-farmers-committed-suicide-in-mp-in-the-past-15-years/story-Y4cxfY8jwhOeeYeroRmMKK.html

Corrupt politicians are in every party, one few are clean. It is worthless to say that politicians are for the welfare of public. In India politics is not service it is business. Politician spend big amount to win election. It is their investment and they wants return on it like a business. Corruption is DNA of Indian politics.

6 decades of Congress rule has made sure that corruption has become a way of life in India. Corruption is a way of life with all parties. The major difference is that in almost all other parties the leaders are leading in corrupt practice s but Mr Modi, all through his political career has never been involved in corruption. So , now Congress is desperately trying to pin Rafael on him .

I totally agree with Usha. Modi and likes of him are rare now not only in Indian politics but in all other fields. Nepotism or favoring kin and kith is so much prevalent. Even a tall leader like Atalji was often criticized for crony capitalism and favoring his son in law. But Modi has been clean. He has none so far in his long political career. His relatives and close family members are still so poor. He can be counted with likes of Abdul Kalam and can be a good example for future.We have seen enough of Lau, Mulayam and Mayawati and how their relatives flourished. Not to forget the rise of Robert Vadra. 

usha manohar wrote:
suni51 wrote:
anil wrote:
MG Singh wrote:

I wrote 2 years back that Modi will fail  and everybody was saying no and ridiculing Rahul.  It has happened and we await the route of Modi in north India. 

It is not fail but it is victory of corrupt system of country. Here in Rajasthan only and only Rajey is responsible for defeat of BJP.

We always find some reason or person for defeats or wins. Actually public looks for a change in the system or change the system.

Earlier Congress lost because of Ashok Gehlot and the many scams he and his govt was involved in. However , there were no such scams during g Vasundara Rajesh tenure , but she was obviously not popular and so lost and Gehlot is back again to loot some more ...

Yes Rajey had no scams like Congress tenure at least none has come so far and in fact she did some good for education of girls and other policies. But definitely her way of ruling became unpopular and having a cow minister was taking it a way too far. She had to pay for it.

Topic Author

E

epraneeth77

@epraneeth

Topic Stats

Created Thursday, 22 March 2018 12:35
Last Updated Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies 0
Views 3.8K
Likes 0

Category

Discussions

433 Topics

Share This Topic