Survival of the fittest. Coincidentally, my neighbor's kid just asked me why the fox said Grapes are sour ? Then I showed this to the kid.
rambabu wrote:suni51 wrote:That is why I said the "Points not match properly". Suppose, you said 5 points a day that means you will READ 35 articles and if the number of posts and points are mismatch the action begins. I hope that is fair enough :)
I agree with you. Restriction on reading articles may not be possible now. But, whatever is possible within your jurisdiction after consulting Maverick may please be done. Other members do like and read articles. But such members maintain a balance. Their whole activity is well balanced. But these members in question are building up the points only by reading articles. Such members should be reined in.
I was expecting something positive from you as a seasoned campaigner and leader in all departments on this site. What do you suggest please?
Survival of the cheatest not the fittest. Why bring kids into the argument?
Kids could understand, where jealous member miserably failed and fallen flat.
will have to delete personal allegation please. Stay at the topic and write if you have anything to solve the problem.
Personal allegations came from which side ? Please have a look at the earlier responses. Still better If the thread is locked.
Thread will stay open for the entire duration of the current week but everything irrelevant will go immediately.
@ Rambabu, What is there to be jealous about? 25/-
@Sunil, No points for reading articles, but could be for comments and moderators have right to edit useless comments. Payment upon reaching some predetermined threshold.
All posts to remain open for only 100 hours.
Moderators have enough power to make things right. And that is how I managed to keep you at 4th place otherwise you had slipped at 7th slot.
Thank you. I support a system where participation will be out of interest rather than merely for earning. I too had began the move to restrict the weekender and it recd. support.
Page 2 of 9