AP should have a new capital and a beautiful one at that. No one can dispute this. A quid pro quid is when the Singapore party will allegedly get the creamy portion of the capital projects as happens in projects of this scale usually. A favor will have been returned multiple times.
It may be or not. Let's see this gesture of Singapore as it is right now.. OK taking for granted what you said is right, what's wrong in Quid Pro Quid if the returns are more satisfactory than expectations ?
After all what are Sushma and Vasundara accused of. Quid pro quid by giving favor for favor at public expense and bending or bypassing laws. It is wrong.
Sushma said in the parliament that she has not derived any personal or monetary benefits. It's nobility Helping a person without expecting returns . If it is otherwise it is immoral. It applies to all Sushmas and ChandraBabus.
