Rajani,
some of the points i find interesting are:
-pete sampras was certainly the most destructive and a joy to watch in the court
-his serve and volley is the best i have ever seen of any player
-i dont think he developed his rallying skills too much, thats why the french open blot
-federer in contrast has a more complete game to win all the titles
-however federer doesnt have the kind of competition sampras had in his time
-and his serve and volley isnt really of the highest standard(the standard set by sampras)
-the most interesting part: sampras' second service was one of the most lethal weapon in his armoury
