Anna's fast will come to an end on tomorrow and he wants to make a new party.Should Anna come into politics?Will he be able to change the political structure of India?

I was a little confused with the title apolitical which means exactly the opposite, probably typing mistake, may be better to correct it...

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/apolitical

Anna's fast will come to an end on tomorrow and he wants to make a new party.Should Anna come into politics?Will he be able to change the political structure of India?

I was a little confused with the title apolitical which means exactly the opposite, probably typing mistake, may be better to correct it...

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/apolitical

yes, it's a typing mistake. She missed one space bar :S :S

Anna's fast will come to an end on tomorrow and he wants to make a new party.Should Anna come into politics?Will he be able to change the political structure of India?

I was a little confused with the title apolitical which means exactly the opposite, probably typing mistake, may be better to correct it...

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/apolitical

Apolitical means 'not political'. Obviously, there is typing mistake in the thread. Anna has definitely right to enter politics. But politics cannot be only on one point. If he forms political party, this must be equipped with full fledged party policy and program consisting of all aspects of state craft. This cannot be on just Lok Pal.

This thread reminds m of Gandhi- He too was trying to make the same efforts initially by doing through His satyagrah etc, while he saw nothing was working he had to form a party- with a promise that they shall be active as long as the nation is not liberated. He could not keep his promise and the result is here to see. We have a dynasty rule in our country, which selects its crown prince-prices with the help of yes-men.
Let's see another party who promises to keep the politics clean and responsible.

Mahatma Gandhi never formed a party. He belonged to Indian National congress. The party was formed long before by Lord Hume. Tilak, Narauji, Lala Lajpat Rai were members of this party. Gandhi just joined this party. Gandhi was never against politics and politicians. anna and his team is just a crude caricature of Gandhi.

I know Gandhi was only 15 when INC was formed by a Brit but Gandhi, RajendraG, Bal Gangadhar Tilak and all the big names joined it later. Gandhi wanted congress not to take over government and to disperse it but they never heard him.
For me Patel was the right choice for this country, even today for me a man who has experience to run an agitation is better than new generation of recruits whose sole qualification is that they come from political leaders' families.
Foe instance, first Akhiles Yadav now his wife. Ridiculous.

This thread reminds m of Gandhi- He too was trying to make the same efforts initially by doing through His satyagrah etc, while he saw nothing was working he had to form a party- with a promise that they shall be active as long as the nation is not liberated. He could not keep his promise and the result is here to see. We have a dynasty rule in our country, which selects its crown prince-prices with the help of yes-men.
Let's see another party who promises to keep the politics clean and responsible.

Mahatma Gandhi never formed a party. He belonged to Indian National congress. The party was formed long before by Lord Hume. Tilak, Narauji, Lala Lajpat Rai were members of this party. Gandhi just joined this party. Gandhi was never against politics and politicians. anna and his team is just a crude caricature of Gandhi.

I know Gandhi was only 15 when INC was formed by a Brit but Gandhi, RajendraG, Bal Gangadhar Tilak and all the big names joined it later. Gandhi wanted congress not to take over government and to disperse it but they never heard him.
For me Patel was the right choice for this country, even today for me a man who has experience to run an agitation is better than new generation of recruits whose sole qualification is that they come from political leaders' families.
Foe instance, first Akhiles Yadav now his wife. Ridiculous.

The politicians are acting funny by their dynastic functioning. But this is because very few people enter politics so that the field is open only to existing players. So, they may run dynastic politics. Dynastic functioning is also in business, films and other places.
Let us restrict our discussion only to Anna team entering politics. They can enter politics but they have to broaden their outlook and policies and they cannot work only single point of Lok Pal.

This thread reminds m of Gandhi- He too was trying to make the same efforts initially by doing through His satyagrah etc, while he saw nothing was working he had to form a party- with a promise that they shall be active as long as the nation is not liberated. He could not keep his promise and the result is here to see. We have a dynasty rule in our country, which selects its crown prince-prices with the help of yes-men.
Let's see another party who promises to keep the politics clean and responsible.

Mahatma Gandhi never formed a party. He belonged to Indian National congress. The party was formed long before by Lord Hume. Tilak, Narauji, Lala Lajpat Rai were members of this party. Gandhi just joined this party. Gandhi was never against politics and politicians. anna and his team is just a crude caricature of Gandhi.

I know Gandhi was only 15 when INC was formed by a Brit but Gandhi, RajendraG, Bal Gangadhar Tilak and all the big names joined it later. Gandhi wanted congress not to take over government and to disperse it but they never heard him.
For me Patel was the right choice for this country, even today for me a man who has experience to run an agitation is better than new generation of recruits whose sole qualification is that they come from political leaders' families.
Foe instance, first Akhiles Yadav now his wife. Ridiculous.

The politicians are acting funny by their dynastic functioning. But this is because very few people enter politics so that the field is open only to existing players. So, they may run dynastic politics. Dynastic functioning is also in business, films and other places.
Let us restrict our discussion only to Anna team entering politics. They can enter politics but they have to broaden their outlook and policies and they cannot work only single point of Lok Pal.

[/b]

That's where I am walking to >>>> if people like these can take over and lead a country, why not team Anna who has a point to prove. There is a saying, "we shall cross the bridge while we reach it". cheers.

There is no difficulty for Team anna to enter politics. But the problem with them is that they are too impatient. They changed track when their movement failed. Now they are thinking of forming a political party and fighting 2014 parliamentary elections. They are not clear about how to run country. They cannot do with just a single point program. There is every likelihood that they will contest election and may just bag about ten seats maximum in parliament. so less number of seats will cripple them and disappoint. Then they will again change track.

It is understood by many that team anna is simply talking about political alternative as a face saving device in view of dismal failure and loss of public support.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/team-anna-going-political-as-its-movement-failed-digvijay/984149/

http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/anna-s-political-move-face-saver-or-inevitable_791868.html

Baba Ram Dev is particular about professionalization of his volunteers. He needs volunteers for fighting corruption. They will get three years training.

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/live-ramdev-invites-trainees-to-join-campaign/280771-37-64.html

Every one is entering in to politics by using corruption as main theme. We all must wait and see who will be a great leader.

Every one is entering in to politics by using corruption as main theme. We all must wait and see who will be a great leader.

Whosoever is capable of entering and leading this country to a right direction is welcome. Ho long shall we be able to carry such corrupt politicians on our back????