Apart from the issue of freedom of expression and citizens' right to see what they like in privacy, enforcing bans and making too much law is needless burden on judiciary and administrative system. Law should interfere only when there is victimization of any citizen. Watching porn or any thing in privacy does not affect any one and so this should not be conern of law.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
The more things are suppressed or banned , human nature is to bounce back with more force. Be it child Porn or adult porn, if one watches in privacy is the most welcome thing as the Supreme cart verdict says.
Banning is a politicians way of wishing away a problem and a citizens way of feeling comfortable. But in reality the show goes on at higher costs and those required to enforce take their cuts from suppliers.
Politicians should realize with such foolish actions they are becoming the Butts of laughter.
Political Porn ? Yes it stinks and endangers the ecological system. Beware.
There is a good news for all porn lovers, the government has lifted the ban from all sites except those involving children. They did so after the SC said the government cannot stop people wishing to watch porn in privacy. fair enough.
rambabu wrote:This news was revealed by one member already in these discussions. That out of the initial list.the government took a decision to impose ban on those porn sites in which children are involved.
Sorry sir, I did not see that (I am still unable to see that) but the even better news is that internet provider association has said that banning the porn is an impossible task therefore they will not be able to filter child or adult porn from the internet. So nothing will change.
If not I, Vijay has posted. However its good the Government restricted ban on porn only to those which have Porn related to children.
Page 2 of 3