After Telangana they are now getting another chance to argue. Politicians always wants to make a simple issue into a big one and enjoy the results. This is a complete political issue. They can spend the time in improving the states welfare.

The most amusing thing here is Chandrashekar r'aos flipflop regrading Telengana...He had earlier said that true Telangana citizens are those who have forefathers living in the region since 1956 and in Sania's case this is not so, since her father migrated in the eighties from Maharashtra...He has himself started the controversy giving material to BJP with his double forked tongue ! Now his party spokespersson points fingers at Amitabh and others just to justify their stand !

There are definitely quite a few more deserving sportsperson from Andhra who have no controversy attached to them - V V S Lakshman ( cricket), Chetan Anand 9 Badminton) , Pullela Gopichand ( Shuttle Badminton) to name a few ...

Cricket is really not included in Olympics. Chetan Anand and Gopi Chand are also reputed names. But it appears that Sania Mirza has greater achievement and is more in lime light. Now there is no controversy on her. The local leaders had raised controversy but Central leaders all are praising Sania as Pride of India.

Gopichand was the the winner of The coveted award All England badminton championship. There are only two Indians who won the championship. The other was Prakash Padukone, father of Deepika Padukone. When achievements in sports are concerned Sania is nowhere near Gopichand.

But do Gopicand and Prakash Padukone belong to Telangana or Andhra? Please clarify.

Only Gopichand belongs to AP, who migrated to Hyderabad to run his Badminton Academy. Prakash is from Karnataka.

Then Sania Mirza s the only choice. Now the issue is over.

No. Gopichand lives in Hyderabad. Another Tennis player, is Mahesh Bhupathy who achieved more tan Sania.
On one side you say those who live in Hyderabad are the sons of the soils and on the other side you are saying Sania is the only choice. Yes the issue is over long ago because all know that it's the dirty trick to woo the Muslim voters.

By this logic if a Hindu is appointed as brand ambassador then it is a dirty trick to woo the Hindu votes. Let us find a nameless person for the post.

It's not the question of Hindu or Muslim. It's the question of selecting the right candidate. Had KCR selected Gopichand, how he can get Muslim votes which is now unhappy with KCR? And how he can show his hatred towards Telugus who settled in Hyderabad?

The most amusing thing here is Chandrashekar r'aos flipflop regrading Telengana...He had earlier said that true Telangana citizens are those who have forefathers living in the region since 1956 and in Sania's case this is not so, since her father migrated in the eighties from Maharashtra...He has himself started the controversy giving material to BJP with his double forked tongue ! Now his party spokespersson points fingers at Amitabh and others just to justify their stand !

true..This is all becoming too childish and silly actually. Amitabh Bachchan is orginally from Allahabad, he made his career and settled in Maharashtra and is a brand ambassador for the Gujarat state. No one is objecting to that! And there is nothing, in my opinion, that should be objected. While appointing a celebrity as a brand ambassador for any state in India should not take in question the celebrity's state of origin. They should be viewed as Indians and Indians alone. Where the question of Sania Mirza is concerned, there may be people who object to it because she is a Muslim, but more than that, the most concerning doubt people have is that she is married to a Pakistani and does not live in India any more, even though she may have an Indian passport.

There are definitely quite a few more deserving sportsperson from Andhra who have no controversy attached to them - V V S Lakshman ( cricket), Chetan Anand 9 Badminton) , Pullela Gopichand ( Shuttle Badminton) to name a few ...

Cricket is really not included in Olympics. Chetan Anand and Gopi Chand are also reputed names. But it appears that Sania Mirza has greater achievement and is more in lime light. Now there is no controversy on her. The local leaders had raised controversy but Central leaders all are praising Sania as Pride of India.

Gopichand was the the winner of The coveted award All England badminton championship. There are only two Indians who won the championship. The other was Prakash Padukone, father of Deepika Padukone. When achievements in sports are concerned Sania is nowhere near Gopichand.

But do Gopicand and Prakash Padukone belong to Telangana or Andhra? Please clarify.

Only Gopichand belongs to AP, who migrated to Hyderabad to run his Badminton Academy. Prakash is from Karnataka.

Then Sania Mirza s the only choice. Now the issue is over.

No. Gopichand lives in Hyderabad. Another Tennis player, is Mahesh Bhupathy who achieved more tan Sania.
On one side you say those who live in Hyderabad are the sons of the soils and on the other side you are saying Sania is the only choice. Yes the issue is over long ago because all know that it's the dirty trick to woo the Muslim voters.

By this logic if a Hindu is appointed as brand ambassador then it is a dirty trick to woo the Hindu votes. Let us find a nameless person for the post.

It's not the question of Hindu or Muslim. It's the question of selecting the right candidate. Had KCR selected Gopichand, how he can get Muslim votes which is now unhappy with KCR? And how he can show his hatred towards Telugus who settled in Hyderabad?

I just need one clarification. If KCR hates Telugus who settled in Hyderabad, what is the language of those who are original Hyderabad residents. I believe they are also Telugu. This appears confusing.

This is justice .....


{CJATTACHMENT ["id": 11097]}