Jump to Forum..
- Boddunan.com Updates
- - Announcements
- - Contests & Rewards
- - Group Discussions
- Discussions
- - General Discussions
- - Improving English Writing Skills
- - Q n A - Find answers to your questions
- - Daily Dose
- - Topics of Interest
- - - Current Affairs & Latest News
- - - Education & Learning
- - - Humor & Jokes
- - - Movies & Entertainment
- Your Vote Counts
- - Feedback
- - Suggestion Box
- Shoutbox
- - Introduce Yourself
- - The Lounge
- - Help
- - Testimonials
The topic is locked.
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
12 years ago
There are people who think there was no Ram or Sita, these were all imaginations of so called Tulsidas or other writers who created them. In that case there is no dispute left whatsoever. I shall not be surprised if Ram Jethmalani changes his name to get rid of this disputed name itself.
Ram Jethmalani also believes this. He has state that Ramayana is an Epic and not history. Rama is a mythological and not historic figure. The role of Rama is that of a bad husband. I agree with ram Jethmalani. But such discussions are of no use. We need not touch the matter that may arouse sentiments.
Actually some subjects and topics are attached with sentiments of people of a particular sect, those have no meaning beyond their wordy meaning but if these touch any one deep inside should better be left to his own choice. Surfacing of such matters may always bring lots of pain and to make it a little more clear, this is possible with Hindu believes only. If any one tries with any other sect, see the reaction.
Normally Hindus play with Hindu sentiments. Others seldom do this. As Hindu, we need not play with beliefs of others. It is best not to touch religious sentiments of any in public but concentrate on real issues. It is okay to work for gender equality but it is no use to gender inequality in ancient time.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
12 years ago
He should not say such word about God.After all Rama is a God.
Sharmistha Banerjee
12 years ago
Rama was a bad husband according to Ram Jethmalani. This has led to severe criticism. But Jethmalani sticks to his opinion.
http://www.firstpost.com/politics/ram-comment-no-mistake-i-dont-owe-any-apology-jethmalani-520857.html
That Rama was a bad husband has been criticized in Ramayana itself by a washer man.
The washer man believed that 'Seeta' was unchaste woman and Rama was wrong in accepting her. So, he banished her. This would have pleased washer man. But Jethmalani is not pleased. This is other way.
Let Jethmalani enjoy the freedom of opinion that he's entitled to
12 years ago
He should not say such word about God.After all Rama is a God.
But Puranas say unlike other Avatars, Ram is a human.
12 years ago
Rama was a bad husband according to Ram Jethmalani. This has led to severe criticism. But Jethmalani sticks to his opinion.
http://www.firstpost.com/politics/ram-comment-no-mistake-i-dont-owe-any-apology-jethmalani-520857.html
That Rama was a bad husband has been criticized in Ramayana itself by a washer man.
The washer man believed that 'Seeta' was unchaste woman and Rama was wrong in accepting her. So, he banished her. This would have pleased washer man. But Jethmalani is not pleased. This is other way.
Let Jethmalani enjoy the freedom of opinion that he's entitled to
Everyone has freedom to hold any opinion but expression of opinion is not unrestricted. Further i Believe that any view may be expressed in private gathering or in a specialist or professional gathering but that must not be published and broadcast. Nobody should speak anything inflammatory in public meeting.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
12 years ago
Rama was a bad husband according to Ram Jethmalani. This has led to severe criticism. But Jethmalani sticks to his opinion.
http://www.firstpost.com/politics/ram-comment-no-mistake-i-dont-owe-any-apology-jethmalani-520857.html
That Rama was a bad husband has been criticized in Ramayana itself by a washer man.
The washer man believed that 'Seeta' was unchaste woman and Rama was wrong in accepting her. So, he banished her. This would have pleased washer man. But Jethmalani is not pleased. This is other way.
Let Jethmalani enjoy the freedom of opinion that he's entitled to
Everyone has freedom to hold any opinion but expression of opinion is not unrestricted. Further i Believe that any view may be expressed in private gathering or in a specialist or professional gathering but that must not be published and broadcast. Nobody should speak anything inflammatory in public meeting.
That should be left to his wisdom
12 years ago
Ram was a good husband. He was faithful and honest husband. He escorted his wife, Sita from demon king, Ravan. This is true that he has exiled Sita to live in the jungle. However, he himself became sad ot live without his wife, Sita. He has heart and soul loved his wife. He felt the torture and pain to live away from her and their children.
Jethmalani has no holy mind.
Jethmalani has no holy mind.
12 years ago
Ram was a good husband. He was faithful and honest husband. He escorted his wife, Sita from demon king, Ravan. This is true that he has exiled Sita to live in the jungle. However, he himself became sad ot live without his wife, Sita. He has heart and soul loved his wife. He felt the torture and pain to live away from her and their children.
Jethmalani has no holy mind.
What people will not do to hog the limelight.
12 years ago
Ram was a good husband. He was faithful and honest husband. He escorted his wife, Sita from demon king, Ravan. This is true that he has exiled Sita to live in the jungle. However, he himself became sad ot live without his wife, Sita. He has heart and soul loved his wife. He felt the torture and pain to live away from her and their children.
Jethmalani has no holy mind.
What people will not do to hog the limelight.
Actually many people don't understand the characters of mythology and god. That's why they do negative activities more in life.
12 years ago
Posts like- Let him have his opinion- Let him use his own judgment- etc. are purposeless. A member should only give an opinion with reason. If he has nothing to add in favor or against, it is useless to write. This is similar to earlier practice of some simply writing- I agree. This is a kind of spam and such posts can be deleted.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
Page 2 of 3
You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.
Related Topics