Jump to Forum..
- Boddunan.com Updates
- - Announcements
- - Contests & Rewards
- - Group Discussions
- Discussions
- - General Discussions
- - Improving English Writing Skills
- - Q n A - Find answers to your questions
- - Daily Dose
- - Topics of Interest
- - - Current Affairs & Latest News
- - - Education & Learning
- - - Humor & Jokes
- - - Movies & Entertainment
- Your Vote Counts
- - Feedback
- - Suggestion Box
- Shoutbox
- - Introduce Yourself
- - The Lounge
- - Help
- - Testimonials
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
12 years ago
It's amazing how such people get elected by general people. Uneducated people inside the parliament is one of the major reasons why we are still underdeveloped. Anyone who is an India must respect the national song mentally and physically. I mean if "Vande Materam" is playing then an Indian should stand up in respect to the song. This is what we have learnt in schools.
Thanks
Rakhi
You are right be he is belongs with religion which not allowed to worship mother land and mother. But nation is exalted.
12 years ago
This is a matter of shame, whatever the MP's religion may be, the moment he enters those hallowed portals of democracy,. he or she is expected to honour and respect all that stands for what is our country, including the National song. But this attitude of disrespecting the song just because it contains word mataram is a sign that as a country and that too, a democratic one, we still have not evolved and have a long way to go. Exactly the kind of attitude that shows the chinks in our integrity and unity and is the very achilles' heel that the other countries know of and take advantage of us! :blink: Truly shameful!
I totally agree with that , whe you decide to be part of your country's governance nothing else should come in the way. Like in Religion you have certail regulations so does national feeling .If one is unable or unwilling to show respect then one should not be a part of the process, since they take a oath after being elected ...
Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!
12 years ago
a member of parliament walked out when national song 'Vande Mataram' was being played. The member is not repentant. WEhatever be individual views, one must go by rules. The member should either have respected the song or left before and not during the playing of song. One may not respect but he has no business to disrespect.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/i-do-not-respect-the-national-song--bsp-mp-105152094.html.
He must have received a call on his mobile or gone out for some urgent business. Anyway, you are right, his action was an insult to the National Anthem.
Mala Jaiswar
12 years ago
This is a matter of shame, whatever the MP's religion may be, the moment he enters those hallowed portals of democracy,. he or she is expected to honour and respect all that stands for what is our country, including the National song. But this attitude of disrespecting the song just because it contains word mataram is a sign that as a country and that too, a democratic one, we still have not evolved and have a long way to go. Exactly the kind of attitude that shows the chinks in our integrity and unity and is the very achilles' heel that the other countries know of and take advantage of us! :blink: Truly shameful!
I totally agree with that , whe you decide to be part of your country's governance nothing else should come in the way. Like in Religion you have certail regulations so does national feeling .If one is unable or unwilling to show respect then one should not be a part of the process, since they take a oath after being elected ...
Oath is joke for them. They don't that if nation save than society save and religion save. If all citizens of India accept that first we are citizen of this country than all problems solved.
Thank you said by: usha manohar
12 years ago
a member of parliament walked out when national song 'Vande Mataram' was being played. The member is not repentant. WEhatever be individual views, one must go by rules. The member should either have respected the song or left before and not during the playing of song. One may not respect but he has no business to disrespect.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/i-do-not-respect-the-national-song--bsp-mp-105152094.html.
He must have received a call on his mobile or gone out for some urgent business. Anyway, you are right, his action was an insult to the National Anthem.
He did not do it during National Anthem but song, Vande Mataram as he did not want to participate in it. This is not an acceptable action from a senior member of the house, he should be sacked immediately.
12 years ago
This is a matter of shame, whatever the MP's religion may be, the moment he enters those hallowed portals of democracy,. he or she is expected to honour and respect all that stands for what is our country, including the National song. But this attitude of disrespecting the song just because it contains word mataram is a sign that as a country and that too, a democratic one, we still have not evolved and have a long way to go. Exactly the kind of attitude that shows the chinks in our integrity and unity and is the very achilles' heel that the other countries know of and take advantage of us! :blink: Truly shameful!
We have to understand the viewpoint of dissidents too. All that we expect is that nobody should cause disrespect. If somebody wishes not to participate, he should move away well in time. Leaving while the song is played is obviously unacceptable.
I agree with this view that we should respect the views of the dissidents too and majorly they are being respected. But they should also understand the simple thing that since India is originally a Hindu country with its roots deeply ingrained in those doctrines dating back to thousands of years, it is but natural that the national song be such that such salutes and ordains our country as mother and a goddess. So they should accept it gracefully and with dignity that is due in the same manner that we grant to their religion and their prophets.
"I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally."
- W. C. Fields :)
12 years ago
This is a matter of shame, whatever the MP's religion may be, the moment he enters those hallowed portals of democracy,. he or she is expected to honour and respect all that stands for what is our country, including the National song. But this attitude of disrespecting the song just because it contains word mataram is a sign that as a country and that too, a democratic one, we still have not evolved and have a long way to go. Exactly the kind of attitude that shows the chinks in our integrity and unity and is the very achilles' heel that the other countries know of and take advantage of us! :blink: Truly shameful!
I totally agree with that , whe you decide to be part of your country's governance nothing else should come in the way. Like in Religion you have certail regulations so does national feeling .If one is unable or unwilling to show respect then one should not be a part of the process, since they take a oath after being elected ...
True, once they take an oath, then they are ideally no longer followers of a Hindu religion or Muslim religion but they are first and foremost citizens of India with only one religion, that is nationalism. But then who understands or even realises the significance of the oath that they take?? The problem is that in spite of occasional claims of Indians being united in spite of vast diversity, at heart they are not, otherwise, such misdemeanors would not happen!
"I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally."
- W. C. Fields :)
Thank you said by: usha manohar, krishna pramod
12 years ago
This is a matter of shame, whatever the MP's religion may be, the moment he enters those hallowed portals of democracy,. he or she is expected to honour and respect all that stands for what is our country, including the National song. But this attitude of disrespecting the song just because it contains word mataram is a sign that as a country and that too, a democratic one, we still have not evolved and have a long way to go. Exactly the kind of attitude that shows the chinks in our integrity and unity and is the very achilles' heel that the other countries know of and take advantage of us! :blink: Truly shameful!
I totally agree with that , whe you decide to be part of your country's governance nothing else should come in the way. Like in Religion you have certail regulations so does national feeling .If one is unable or unwilling to show respect then one should not be a part of the process, since they take a oath after being elected ...
True, once they take an oath, then they are ideally no longer followers of a Hindu religion or Muslim religion but they are first and foremost citizens of India with only one religion, that is nationalism. But then who understands or even realises the significance of the oath that they take?? The problem is that in spite of occasional claims of Indians being united in spite of vast diversity, at heart they are not, otherwise, such misdemeanors would not happen!
The fact remains that most of us are more religious than nationalist or secular. There is no controversy on national anthem and even on other songs like 'Sare jahan se achhha'. Controversy is always on the national song- Vande mataram. Those who are very enthusiastic on this song are so not because of their 'nationalism' but because of religious reason. Those who do not respect this song also do for religious reasons. It is not compulsory to recite or be present in a gathering where this is recited. Those who dislike this song are free to absent themselves but not insult.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
12 years ago
This is a matter of shame, whatever the MP's religion may be, the moment he enters those hallowed portals of democracy,. he or she is expected to honour and respect all that stands for what is our country, including the National song. But this attitude of disrespecting the song just because it contains word mataram is a sign that as a country and that too, a democratic one, we still have not evolved and have a long way to go. Exactly the kind of attitude that shows the chinks in our integrity and unity and is the very achilles' heel that the other countries know of and take advantage of us! :blink: Truly shameful!
I totally agree with that , whe you decide to be part of your country's governance nothing else should come in the way. Like in Religion you have certail regulations so does national feeling .If one is unable or unwilling to show respect then one should not be a part of the process, since they take a oath after being elected ...
True, once they take an oath, then they are ideally no longer followers of a Hindu religion or Muslim religion but they are first and foremost citizens of India with only one religion, that is nationalism. But then who understands or even realises the significance of the oath that they take?? The problem is that in spite of occasional claims of Indians being united in spite of vast diversity, at heart they are not, otherwise, such misdemeanors would not happen!
The fact remains that most of us are more religious than nationalist or secular. There is no controversy on national anthem and even on other songs like 'Sare jahan se achhha'. Controversy is always on the national song- Vande mataram. Those who are very enthusiastic on this song are so not because of their 'nationalism' but because of religious reason. Those who do not respect this song also do for religious reasons. It is not compulsory to recite or be present in a gathering where this is recited. Those who dislike this song are free to absent themselves but not insult.
I agree that those who do not like it should better remain absent, and yet I cannot but feel that if they are still not able to accept this particular song, they have no right to remain in the house as its esteemed members! Like I said earlier, even though the song may have religious significance, it is essential that it be viewed as of being 'national essence' rather than as being religious!
"I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally."
- W. C. Fields :)
12 years ago
This is a matter of shame, whatever the MP's religion may be, the moment he enters those hallowed portals of democracy,. he or she is expected to honour and respect all that stands for what is our country, including the National song. But this attitude of disrespecting the song just because it contains word mataram is a sign that as a country and that too, a democratic one, we still have not evolved and have a long way to go. Exactly the kind of attitude that shows the chinks in our integrity and unity and is the very achilles' heel that the other countries know of and take advantage of us! :blink: Truly shameful!
I totally agree with that , whe you decide to be part of your country's governance nothing else should come in the way. Like in Religion you have certail regulations so does national feeling .If one is unable or unwilling to show respect then one should not be a part of the process, since they take a oath after being elected ...
True, once they take an oath, then they are ideally no longer followers of a Hindu religion or Muslim religion but they are first and foremost citizens of India with only one religion, that is nationalism. But then who understands or even realises the significance of the oath that they take?? The problem is that in spite of occasional claims of Indians being united in spite of vast diversity, at heart they are not, otherwise, such misdemeanors would not happen!
The fact remains that most of us are more religious than nationalist or secular. There is no controversy on national anthem and even on other songs like 'Sare jahan se achhha'. Controversy is always on the national song- Vande mataram. Those who are very enthusiastic on this song are so not because of their 'nationalism' but because of religious reason. Those who do not respect this song also do for religious reasons. It is not compulsory to recite or be present in a gathering where this is recited. Those who dislike this song are free to absent themselves but not insult.
But I do not see any religious angle in Vande Mataram apart from it's simple prayer for mother. I do not think that any religion forbids to sing praise for his/her own mother. Our nation is considered mother in our culture, so it should not be a big problem if one only stands while the song is on even if one does not want to sing it. I don't think Bankim C C ever thought in his wildest of dreams about religion angle when he wrote this song.
Page 2 of 3
You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.
Related Topics