Who can be best PM among Mr. Narendra Modi ,LK Advani and Rajnath?

Actually people seeing in Modi as a good leader so they can not accept other leader this time.

I also see Modi as best leader who can reduce corruption, bring national pride back and direct country towards progress and prosperity. He is best among available. They may charge him on different grounds but then who is pure and without sin? Let the first stone thrown by one who has never committed a sin.

People don’t have a choice before them. They have to choose between a squint eye and a blind eye.

True, at least a ray of hope (sight) is there to start with :)

Narendra Modi in the present scenario is the only choice before the people. We have given worthless fools an opportunity earlier. At least seeing the way he has been working as the CM of Gujarat, which is far better than congress ruled states, we should opt for Narendra Midi.

In view of ground reality of coalition politics and almost impossibility of BJP getting single party majority, MODi is out of question. BJP is absent in many states. At best, BJP may be in a position to make government with allies. Allies are not likely to accept Modi. Nitish Kumar, the only secular ally left NDA. This reality must not be forgotten while projecting Modi. This is clearly unrealistic and fantasy only.

Here is what veteran leader sharad Pawar has to say. According to him, there can be only Congress led or congress supported government.

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/bjp-wont-get-allies-if-it-names-modi-as-pm-candidate-sharad-pawar/411463-37-64.html

In view of ground reality of coalition politics and almost impossibility of BJP getting single party majority, MODi is out of question. BJP is absent in many states. At best, BJP may be in a position to make government with allies. Allies are not likely to accept Modi. Nitish Kumar, the only secular ally left NDA. This reality must not be forgotten while projecting Modi. This is clearly unrealistic and fantasy only.

Here is what veteran leader sharad Pawar has to say. According to him, there can be only Congress led or congress supported government.

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/bjp-wont-get-allies-if-it-names-modi-as-pm-candidate-sharad-pawar/411463-37-64.html

I don't think everything would move according to Sharad Pawar this time. I am not sure if BJP will rule this country but it is not going to be Congress either.

In view of ground reality of coalition politics and almost impossibility of BJP getting single party majority, MODi is out of question. BJP is absent in many states. At best, BJP may be in a position to make government with allies. Allies are not likely to accept Modi. Nitish Kumar, the only secular ally left NDA. This reality must not be forgotten while projecting Modi. This is clearly unrealistic and fantasy only.

Here is what veteran leader sharad Pawar has to say. According to him, there can be only Congress led or congress supported government.

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/bjp-wont-get-allies-if-it-names-modi-as-pm-candidate-sharad-pawar/411463-37-64.html

I don't think everything would move according to Sharad Pawar this time. I am not sure if BJP will rule this country but it is not going to be Congress either.

I agree. Sharad Pawar also has only an assessment. Nobody can make exact forecast. But sharad Pawar is reasonable enough. He says that he will not contest election. Also his own part MPs would not be enough to justify his leadership of cabinet. But he is right to say that the government will be either congress led or congress supported. Congress may not get enough seats. But then Congress can support another party accepting junior position.

Actually people seeing in Modi as a good leader so they can not accept other leader this time.

I also see Modi as best leader who can reduce corruption, bring national pride back and direct country towards progress and prosperity. He is best among available. They may charge him on different grounds but then who is pure and without sin? Let the first stone thrown by one who has never committed a sin.

People don’t have a choice before them. They have to choose between a squint eye and a blind eye.

True, at least a ray of hope (sight) is there to start with :)

A squint king is better among blinds.

Actually people seeing in Modi as a good leader so they can not accept other leader this time.

I also see Modi as best leader who can reduce corruption, bring national pride back and direct country towards progress and prosperity. He is best among available. They may charge him on different grounds but then who is pure and without sin? Let the first stone thrown by one who has never committed a sin.

People don’t have a choice before them. They have to choose between a squint eye and a blind eye.

True, at least a ray of hope (sight) is there to start with :)

A squint king is better among blinds.

If you feel that way the man in question is known as 'man with vision' and the proverb says "a one-eyed-man is king of blinds' kingdom"

Now BJP leader Jawant Singh has also opined that Prime ministerial candidate can be decided only after election results depending on number of seats. He has rightly remarked that ours is not a presidential system where head of state/ government is directly elected. Here people elect only MPs and it is for elected MPs to select the Prime minister.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/PM-nominee-should-be-announced-after-polls-BJP-s-Jaswant-Singh/Article1-1102911.aspx

Its good way but that way LK advani may win the PM seat due to internal politics because most of politician want to stop Modi in front.

Its good way but that way LK advani may win the PM seat due to internal politics because most of politician want to stop Modi in front.

BJP MPs will like Modi but the allies would not. Hence some one else- may be Sushma Swaraj be elected as leader of ruling alliance.

Yes you are right but due to lot of senior leader in front its very difficult to select best PM.

Yes you are right but due to lot of senior leader in front its very difficult to select best PM.

Really the question of electing P.M. will arise only after parliamentary election results. Now this is premature speculation.

True the question will arise only after the elections are over but to answer the original question asked by thread starter
Modi seems to be the best choice.

Yes you are right but due to lot of senior leader in front its very difficult to select best PM.

Really the question of electing P.M. will arise only after parliamentary election results. Now this is premature speculation.

Even after parliamentary elections, none can predict the suitability of a PM candidate in the present quick changing scenario. A state leader may be successful. Success in a small region doesn't mean success in a vast region.

A worker who begins his journey from grass root level makes a perfect leader. Someone who drops down from sky never knows ground realities. Someone doing good in a state is likely to do good if handed a bigger responsibility.

Suitability is decided by the track record. Again its a guideline. Not a perfect measuring rod. Above all, the prospective candidate should be free from controversies. Lal Bahadur Shastri s an example.

In the parliamentary system, suitability is nothing but enjoying support of majority in parliament.

In the parliamentary system, suitability is nothing but enjoying support of majority in parliament.

True. But mere numbers can prove a person's capabilities ?

In the parliamentary system, suitability is nothing but enjoying support of majority in parliament.

True. But mere numbers can prove a person's capabilities ?

There is no other criteria. somebody whom you consider capable cannot be PM if he has no majority.

In the parliamentary system, suitability is nothing but enjoying support of majority in parliament.

True. But mere numbers can prove a person's capabilities ?

There is no other criteria. somebody whom you consider capable cannot be PM if he has no majority.

True, I don't see any scope for BJP in coming election so no Modi, he does not deserve since they are no going to reach anywhere near majority.

In the parliamentary system, suitability is nothing but enjoying support of majority in parliament.

True. But mere numbers can prove a person's capabilities ?

There is no other criteria. somebody whom you consider capable cannot be PM if he has no majority.

Unfortunately that's the fact. I'm not denying your statement. What I wanted to say is numbers can be boosted with a price, but not the capabilities.