What is important here is that we adhere to the Boddunan guideline on forum discussion. We should always center round the theme of the tread and not deviate, express views freely and frankly and also read others' views and arguments. Diversity of thoughts is the essence of discussion.

Perfection or imperfection is relative to the quality awareness as well as strict adherence to the rules of the game! Many discussions suffer a poor fate mainly because the participants get too emotionally attached to their points of view. They fail to show the kind of openness to accept new train of thoughts. A discussion becomes productive when it is laced with humor,knowledge and liveliness!

Many participants tend to go with the view of the group as a whole and hesitate in stating their points and ideas. One should avoid being wallflower in a group and contribute intellectually without breaking the group harmony and rules.

Many participants tend to go with the view of the group as a whole and hesitate in stating their points and ideas. One should avoid being wallflower in a group and contribute intellectually without breaking the group harmony and rules.

Going with majority view against your own conviction defeats the purpose of discussion. Everyone should present his views with arguments boldly even if nobody else agrees to him.

I do not think if some one convinces others with his/her points is eligible to be called a winner. We are here to discuss not to pass a resolution of any kind. If some one has any thing to say should come forward. Others may or not may like those views but then what is the use of a discussion site if we find some one pressurizing to subscribe to his or her version of the views.

I do not think if some one convinces others with his/her points is eligible to be called a winner. We are here to discuss not to pass a resolution of any kind. If some one has any thing to say should come forward. Others may or not may like those views but then what is the use of a discussion site if we find some one pressurizing to subscribe to his or her version of the views.

Forum discussions differ from parliamentary and corporate discussions. The forum discussions are only for sharing views and not for any action. There is no question of pressure. Each one should freely express views independently even if others disagree. It cannot be said that the minority view is inferior any way.

I do not think if some one convinces others with his/her points is eligible to be called a winner. We are here to discuss not to pass a resolution of any kind. If some one has any thing to say should come forward. Others may or not may like those views but then what is the use of a discussion site if we find some one pressurizing to subscribe to his or her version of the views.

Forum discussions differ from parliamentary and corporate discussions. The forum discussions are only for sharing views and not for any action. There is no question of pressure. Each one should freely express views independently even if others disagree. It cannot be said that the minority view is inferior any way.

That exactly is the point sir, I am here for my bit of ideas if I find any thing to add. There is no need to take me seriously if you do not find it to your choice. I have done my job, now that is up to you to accept it or reject it. That is not my choice nor intention.