For simple reasons, private sector does it for a fee and does it as expected and money it gets in return. The government sector does not do unless paid under the table and that too not as required (beside their set salaries and perks). Even a government sweeper demands extra money for cleaning in front of houses. And all this while they have job security and pension facilities after retirement, which no private worker gets despite doing far more than government workers. Government takes responsibility to carry out work satisfactorily, so the unfulfilled expectations make them target of criticism.

For simple reasons, private sector does it for a fee and does it as expected and money it gets in return. The government sector does not do unless paid under the table and that too not as required (beside their set salaries and perks). Even a government sweeper demands extra money for cleaning in front of houses. And all this while they have job security and pension facilities after retirement, which no private worker gets despite doing far more than government workers. Government takes responsibility to carry out work satisfactorily, so the unfulfilled expectations make them target of criticism.

It is right Sunil situation in private sectors is not good. In private sector graduate engineer is getting less than peon in government sector.

For simple reasons, private sector does it for a fee and does it as expected and money it gets in return. The government sector does not do unless paid under the table and that too not as required (beside their set salaries and perks). Even a government sweeper demands extra money for cleaning in front of houses. And all this while they have job security and pension facilities after retirement, which no private worker gets despite doing far more than government workers. Government takes responsibility to carry out work satisfactorily, so the unfulfilled expectations make them target of criticism.

Now the private sector and bodies like NGOs, private institutions have a greater role than before. But still the habit of blaming government only prevails.

http://zeenews.india.com/bbv/why-only-blame-government-when-people-too-are-responsible_869190.html

For simple reasons, private sector does it for a fee and does it as expected and money it gets in return. The government sector does not do unless paid under the table and that too not as required (beside their set salaries and perks). Even a government sweeper demands extra money for cleaning in front of houses. And all this while they have job security and pension facilities after retirement, which no private worker gets despite doing far more than government workers. Government takes responsibility to carry out work satisfactorily, so the unfulfilled expectations make them target of criticism.

Govt employees and private sector both indulge in corruption. What is the difference:

Govt employees indulge in corruption for personal benefit.
Private sector employees indulge in corruption for benefit of their employers. They bribe the government employees for sake of their employers.

For simple reasons, private sector does it for a fee and does it as expected and money it gets in return. The government sector does not do unless paid under the table and that too not as required (beside their set salaries and perks). Even a government sweeper demands extra money for cleaning in front of houses. And all this while they have job security and pension facilities after retirement, which no private worker gets despite doing far more than government workers. Government takes responsibility to carry out work satisfactorily, so the unfulfilled expectations make them target of criticism.

Govt employees and private sector both indulge in corruption. What is the difference:

Govt employees indulge in corruption for personal benefit.
Private sector employees indulge in corruption for benefit of their employers. They bribe the government employees for sake of their employers.

But you agree to it that government employees do not work unless they are bribed, so to make things moving private sector has no option but to do that as ast option. But why the government employees make it their right to work only after they are bribed. However the question here is that of criticism of government, BECAUSE it takes the responsibility of smooth working of every function to see maximum facilities to public. Private sectors are no way authorised to do any work on their own discretion unless asked for or engaged for. It's government who is responsible for a good and bad work in a country.

For simple reasons, private sector does it for a fee and does it as expected and money it gets in return. The government sector does not do unless paid under the table and that too not as required (beside their set salaries and perks). Even a government sweeper demands extra money for cleaning in front of houses. And all this while they have job security and pension facilities after retirement, which no private worker gets despite doing far more than government workers. Government takes responsibility to carry out work satisfactorily, so the unfulfilled expectations make them target of criticism.

Govt employees and private sector both indulge in corruption. What is the difference:

Govt employees indulge in corruption for personal benefit.
Private sector employees indulge in corruption for benefit of their employers. They bribe the government employees for sake of their employers.

But you agree to it that government employees do not work unless they are bribed, so to make things moving private sector has no option but to do that as ast option. But why the government employees make it their right to work only after they are bribed. However the question here is that of criticism of government, BECAUSE it takes the responsibility of smooth working of every function to see maximum facilities to public. Private sectors are no way authorised to do any work on their own discretion unless asked for or engaged for. It's government who is responsible for a good and bad work in a country.

actually corruption is not issue of govt and private. In fact, all are corrupt. People do not bribe for things that are easily available. They bribe for undue favors and getting things done earlier than would be in due course. Really this is a matter of clash of interests between rich and poor. It is rich who are benefited as they are ready to bribe. The poor suffer. This bribery and corruption discriminates in favor of rich and against the poor. Unless this aspect is considered and those really suffering from corruption get organized and fight, corruption cannot be fought. The rich who gain will never fight against corruption irrespective of what they say.

For simple reasons, private sector does it for a fee and does it as expected and money it gets in return. The government sector does not do unless paid under the table and that too not as required (beside their set salaries and perks). Even a government sweeper demands extra money for cleaning in front of houses. And all this while they have job security and pension facilities after retirement, which no private worker gets despite doing far more than government workers. Government takes responsibility to carry out work satisfactorily, so the unfulfilled expectations make them target of criticism.

Govt employees and private sector both indulge in corruption. What is the difference:

Govt employees indulge in corruption for personal benefit.
Private sector employees indulge in corruption for benefit of their employers. They bribe the government employees for sake of their employers.

But you agree to it that government employees do not work unless they are bribed, so to make things moving private sector has no option but to do that as ast option. But why the government employees make it their right to work only after they are bribed. However the question here is that of criticism of government, BECAUSE it takes the responsibility of smooth working of every function to see maximum facilities to public. Private sectors are no way authorised to do any work on their own discretion unless asked for or engaged for. It's government who is responsible for a good and bad work in a country.

actually corruption is not issue of govt and private. In fact, all are corrupt. People do not bribe for things that are easily available. They bribe for undue favors and getting things done earlier than would be in due course. Really this is a matter of clash of interests between rich and poor. It is rich who are benefited as they are ready to bribe. The poor suffer. This bribery and corruption discriminates in favor of rich and against the poor. Unless this aspect is considered and those really suffering from corruption get organized and fight, corruption cannot be fought. The rich who gain will never fight against corruption irrespective of what they say.

Yes Gulshan ji.. We all are to be blamed... If their roots are corrup we are also the one who are offering them bribe to work. If we take stand things might get better a bit..

For simple reasons, private sector does it for a fee and does it as expected and money it gets in return. The government sector does not do unless paid under the table and that too not as required (beside their set salaries and perks). Even a government sweeper demands extra money for cleaning in front of houses. And all this while they have job security and pension facilities after retirement, which no private worker gets despite doing far more than government workers. Government takes responsibility to carry out work satisfactorily, so the unfulfilled expectations make them target of criticism.

Govt employees and private sector both indulge in corruption. What is the difference:

Govt employees indulge in corruption for personal benefit.
Private sector employees indulge in corruption for benefit of their employers. They bribe the government employees for sake of their employers.

But you agree to it that government employees do not work unless they are bribed, so to make things moving private sector has no option but to do that as ast option. But why the government employees make it their right to work only after they are bribed. However the question here is that of criticism of government, BECAUSE it takes the responsibility of smooth working of every function to see maximum facilities to public. Private sectors are no way authorised to do any work on their own discretion unless asked for or engaged for. It's government who is responsible for a good and bad work in a country.

actually corruption is not issue of govt and private. In fact, all are corrupt. People do not bribe for things that are easily available. They bribe for undue favors and getting things done earlier than would be in due course. Really this is a matter of clash of interests between rich and poor. It is rich who are benefited as they are ready to bribe. The poor suffer. This bribery and corruption discriminates in favor of rich and against the poor. Unless this aspect is considered and those really suffering from corruption get organized and fight, corruption cannot be fought. The rich who gain will never fight against corruption irrespective of what they say.

Yes Gulshan ji.. We all are to be blamed... If their roots are corrup we are also the one who are offering them bribe to work. If we take stand things might get better a bit..

Probably the time is round the corner when public will offer something else in place of bribes or teach black marketers a lesson. Now it is up to public when do they plan to wake up and make things straight.