But what has she done as Governor of Mizoram, where she is posted now. A governor has a role independent of the state government and mer disagreement or refusal by governor to sign some papers cannot be dubbed as misconduct. Then, she should have been sacked as governor of Gujarat and not transferred to the new state.

The Mozoram Govrnor has bn sacked. Union governmnt says that there is no political motive. But unless they can give some convincing reasons for hr removal, there is no way we may belive tat reason is not political. Moreover, the governor's term was even otherwise to end shortly.

http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/govt-says-no-politics-behind-kamla-beniwal-sacking-congress-demands-answer_953074.html

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/beniwal-sacked-in-accordance-with-constitution-naidu/article6291108.ece

But what has she done as Governor of Mizoram, where she is posted now. A governor has a role independent of the state government and mer disagreement or refusal by governor to sign some papers cannot be dubbed as misconduct. Then, she should have been sacked as governor of Gujarat and not transferred to the new state.

Well, we will have to wait and see the new developments.....Since Pranab Mukherji himself has given the orders there must be more than one valid reason for her removal, just because she holds a high position does not mean that she gets away with what she has done in the past !

But what has she done as Governor of Mizoram, where she is posted now. A governor has a role independent of the state government and mer disagreement or refusal by governor to sign some papers cannot be dubbed as misconduct. Then, she should have been sacked as governor of Gujarat and not transferred to the new state.

Well, we will have to wait and see the new developments.....Since Pranab Mukherji himself has given the orders there must be more than one valid reason for her removal, just because she holds a high position does not mean that she gets away with what she has done in the past !

The President acts only on advice of union cabinet. So what ever is done by President or in his name, only union cabinet and not the Presdient personally is answerable.

But what has she done as Governor of Mizoram, where she is posted now. A governor has a role independent of the state government and mer disagreement or refusal by governor to sign some papers cannot be dubbed as misconduct. Then, she should have been sacked as governor of Gujarat and not transferred to the new state.

Well, we will have to wait and see the new developments.....Since Pranab Mukherji himself has given the orders there must be more than one valid reason for her removal, just because she holds a high position does not mean that she gets away with what she has done in the past !

The President acts only on advice of union cabinet. So what ever is done by President or in his name, only union cabinet and not the Presdient personally is answerable.

It goes without saying that the president acted on the advice of the union cabinet. That's why the opposition parties are blaming that the union government is resorting to vendetta.

But what has she done as Governor of Mizoram, where she is posted now. A governor has a role independent of the state government and mer disagreement or refusal by governor to sign some papers cannot be dubbed as misconduct. Then, she should have been sacked as governor of Gujarat and not transferred to the new state.

Well, we will have to wait and see the new developments.....Since Pranab Mukherji himself has given the orders there must be more than one valid reason for her removal, just because she holds a high position does not mean that she gets away with what she has done in the past !

The President acts only on advice of union cabinet. So what ever is done by President or in his name, only union cabinet and not the Presdient personally is answerable.

It goes without saying that the president acted on the advice of the union cabinet. That's why the opposition parties are blaming that the union government is resorting to vendetta.

No doubt, It is well known that Presdient acts on advice of Union Cabinet but a member remarked that President himself had given orders. That is why I had to post that President is not answerable but only the union cabinet is responsible.

But what has she done as Governor of Mizoram, where she is posted now. A governor has a role independent of the state government and mer disagreement or refusal by governor to sign some papers cannot be dubbed as misconduct. Then, she should have been sacked as governor of Gujarat and not transferred to the new state.

Well, we will have to wait and see the new developments.....Since Pranab Mukherji himself has given the orders there must be more than one valid reason for her removal, just because she holds a high position does not mean that she gets away with what she has done in the past !

The President acts only on advice of union cabinet. So what ever is done by President or in his name, only union cabinet and not the Presdient personally is answerable.

It goes without saying that the president acted on the advice of the union cabinet. That's why the opposition parties are blaming that the union government is resorting to vendetta.

No doubt, It is well known that Presdient acts on advice of Union Cabinet but a member remarked that President himself had given orders. That is why I had to post that President is not answerable but only the union cabinet is responsible.