A party must have 10 per cent of the strength of the House for its leader to be recognised as the leader of opposition.
http://www.rediff.com/news/report/bjp-not-inclined-to-give-lop-status-to-congress/20140611.htm
10 Replies
In my opinion, it serves them right!!! :evil: And during the reign of Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi as prime ministers, same situation arose so I think congress should accept this fact and people's verdict gracefully!
True. People's verdict is the ultimate and the Congress should not only accept it. But it's high time for it to do a bit of self searching.
In my opinion, it serves them right!!! :evil: And during the reign of Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi as prime ministers, same situation arose so I think congress should accept this fact and people's verdict gracefully!
Actually leader of opposition had no significant role to begin with. Presntly, leader of oposition has role in many activities including appointrment of Lok Pal. Congress is not entitled to the position of leadership of opposition owing to smal numerical strength. This is a fact and there is no occasion to accept this gracefully or otherwsie or reject. All depends on rules.
In my opinion, it serves them right!!! :evil: And during the reign of Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi as prime ministers, same situation arose so I think congress should accept this fact and people's verdict gracefully!
Actually leader of opposition had no significant role to begin with. Presntly, leader of oposition has role in many activities including appointrment of Lok Pal. Congress is not entitled to the position of leadership of opposition owing to smal numerical strength. This is a fact and there is no occasion to accept this gracefully or otherwsie or reject. All depends on rules.
The rule says so. Irrespective of the party, rules are to honored in a democratic set up.
In my opinion, it serves them right!!! :evil: And during the reign of Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi as prime ministers, same situation arose so I think congress should accept this fact and people's verdict gracefully!
Actually leader of opposition had no significant role to begin with. Presntly, leader of oposition has role in many activities including appointrment of Lok Pal. Congress is not entitled to the position of leadership of opposition owing to smal numerical strength. This is a fact and there is no occasion to accept this gracefully or otherwsie or reject. All depends on rules.
The rule says so. Irrespective of the party, rules are to honored in a democratic set up.
But today I heard on a TV channel that legal opinion says there is no need of LOP for appointments like Lok Pal. What is the right position? Yes Congress does not qualify for LOP because of a rule, but they are largest single opposition party -- some satisfaction!
In my opinion, it serves them right!!! :evil: And during the reign of Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi as prime ministers, same situation arose so I think congress should accept this fact and people's verdict gracefully!
Actually leader of opposition had no significant role to begin with. Presntly, leader of oposition has role in many activities including appointrment of Lok Pal. Congress is not entitled to the position of leadership of opposition owing to smal numerical strength. This is a fact and there is no occasion to accept this gracefully or otherwsie or reject. All depends on rules.
The rule says so. Irrespective of the party, rules are to honored in a democratic set up.
But today I heard on a TV channel that legal opinion says there is no need of LOP for appointments like Lok Pal. What is the right position? Yes Congress does not qualify for LOP because of a rule, but they are largest single opposition party -- some satisfaction![/quote
About the legalities, i'm not aware. But if there is a rule, it should be adhered to.
In my opinion, it serves them right!!! :evil: And during the reign of Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi as prime ministers, same situation arose so I think congress should accept this fact and people's verdict gracefully!
Actually leader of opposition had no significant role to begin with. Presntly, leader of oposition has role in many activities including appointrment of Lok Pal. Congress is not entitled to the position of leadership of opposition owing to smal numerical strength. This is a fact and there is no occasion to accept this gracefully or otherwsie or reject. All depends on rules.
The rule says so. Irrespective of the party, rules are to honored in a democratic set up.
But today I heard on a TV channel that legal opinion says there is no need of LOP for appointments like Lok Pal. What is the right position? Yes Congress does not qualify for LOP because of a rule, but they are largest single opposition party -- some satisfaction![/quote
About the legalities, i'm not aware. But if there is a rule, it should be adhered to.
Politicians make rules as per their convenience.
In my opinion, it serves them right!!! :evil: And during the reign of Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi as prime ministers, same situation arose so I think congress should accept this fact and people's verdict gracefully!
Actually leader of opposition had no significant role to begin with. Presntly, leader of oposition has role in many activities including appointrment of Lok Pal. Congress is not entitled to the position of leadership of opposition owing to smal numerical strength. This is a fact and there is no occasion to accept this gracefully or otherwsie or reject. All depends on rules.
The rule says so. Irrespective of the party, rules are to honored in a democratic set up.
But today I heard on a TV channel that legal opinion says there is no need of LOP for appointments like Lok Pal. What is the right position? Yes Congress does not qualify for LOP because of a rule, but they are largest single opposition party -- some satisfaction![/quote
About the legalities, i'm not aware. But if there is a rule, it should be adhered to.
Politicians make rules as per their convenience.
Yes, I agree. Politicians play the games in such a way,their win is always assured. They are the umpires. They are the players.
In my opinion, it serves them right!!! :evil: And during the reign of Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi as prime ministers, same situation arose so I think congress should accept this fact and people's verdict gracefully!
Actually leader of opposition had no significant role to begin with. Presntly, leader of oposition has role in many activities including appointrment of Lok Pal. Congress is not entitled to the position of leadership of opposition owing to smal numerical strength. This is a fact and there is no occasion to accept this gracefully or otherwsie or reject. All depends on rules.
The rule says so. Irrespective of the party, rules are to honored in a democratic set up.
But today I heard on a TV channel that legal opinion says there is no need of LOP for appointments like Lok Pal. What is the right position? Yes Congress does not qualify for LOP because of a rule, but they are largest single opposition party -- some satisfaction![/quote
About the legalities, i'm not aware. But if there is a rule, it should be adhered to.
Politicians make rules as per their convenience.
Yes, I agree. Politicians play the games in such a way,their win is always assured. They are the umpires. They are the players.
We are the clappers !!
In my opinion, it serves them right!!! :evil: And during the reign of Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi as prime ministers, same situation arose so I think congress should accept this fact and people's verdict gracefully!
Actually leader of opposition had no significant role to begin with. Presntly, leader of oposition has role in many activities including appointrment of Lok Pal. Congress is not entitled to the position of leadership of opposition owing to smal numerical strength. This is a fact and there is no occasion to accept this gracefully or otherwsie or reject. All depends on rules.
The rule says so. Irrespective of the party, rules are to honored in a democratic set up.
But today I heard on a TV channel that legal opinion says there is no need of LOP for appointments like Lok Pal. What is the right position? Yes Congress does not qualify for LOP because of a rule, but they are largest single opposition party -- some satisfaction![/quote
About the legalities, i'm not aware. But if there is a rule, it should be adhered to.
Politicians make rules as per their convenience.
Yes, I agree. Politicians play the games in such a way,their win is always assured. They are the umpires. They are the players.
We are the clappers !!
Their paid band of sycophants.
Topic Author
R
rambabu
@rambabu
Topic Stats
Created
Thursday, 12 June 2014 00:33
Last Updated
Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies
0
Views
1.3K
Likes
0