The question is why the tainted politicians get tickets. This only goes to show 'corruption' is not really issue with people. The 'tainted' and 'corrupt' have more chances to win. Is not so, no party would give them tickets. Ao where does the fault lies? It is no use blaming politicians. Instead blame voters.

Actually people want work and they know that the 'clean and honest' are really rootless, spineless, useless and good for nothing. They have recently seen this in Delhi where the first ever goverment by 'clean and honest' Kejriwal led AAP failed to perform and quit. This is so everywhere. You may tolerate a dishonest servant who performs but will sack ther honest one who is useless and performs nothing. It is necessary to ponder why the 'corrupt and trainted' win election inspite of all adverse publicity.

People are aware about the "Performance" factor of the congress. That's why it has been shown the gate. The party which did nothing but harmed the people for 12 long years is not an exact definition of Performance.

For people, 'performance' is not same as 'corruption'. Congress and BJP both have given tickets to 'tainted'. There is no doubt that the said corrupt will win on tickets of Congress, BJP, DMK and AIADMK all. This is really not a party issue.

Agreed. Corruption is not a party issue. Irrespective of the parties it's omnipresent.. But fielding a candidate by a party who's facing serious corruption charges definitely shows that party in a poor light.

This shows not only the party but also voters in poor light. Why the party gives ticket to the 'corrupt'? This is because he will get votes and the 'honest' will not. Again, I may stress that the 'corrupt' really perform. The 'honest' may not even spend the local area development fund and do nothing. He will not help anyone generally. But the dishonest or corrupt will spend the local area funds and satisfy people even though he may also make some money for himself. The dishonest/ corrupt will help people to get govt. job and people will be satisfied with him and evcen pay him for his such service. In short voters are happy with candidate who helps them and unhappy with one who does nothing. corruption does not matter. In villages, liquer and other items are gifted and voters happily accept these and vote for the 'corrupt'. The corrupt voters will elect only corrupt leader.

That's true. Like people like leader. Electorate awareness is yet to come of age in India. But I'm sure there will be a change sooner than later. For the same reason EC has made this time elaborate awareness programmes highlighting the registration of names like never before.

The question is why the tainted politicians get tickets. This only goes to show 'corruption' is not really issue with people. The 'tainted' and 'corrupt' have more chances to win. Is not so, no party would give them tickets. Ao where does the fault lies? It is no use blaming politicians. Instead blame voters.

Actually people want work and they know that the 'clean and honest' are really rootless, spineless, useless and good for nothing. They have recently seen this in Delhi where the first ever goverment by 'clean and honest' Kejriwal led AAP failed to perform and quit. This is so everywhere. You may tolerate a dishonest servant who performs but will sack ther honest one who is useless and performs nothing. It is necessary to ponder why the 'corrupt and trainted' win election inspite of all adverse publicity.

People are aware about the "Performance" factor of the congress. That's why it has been shown the gate. The party which did nothing but harmed the people for 12 long years is not an exact definition of Performance.

For people, 'performance' is not same as 'corruption'. Congress and BJP both have given tickets to 'tainted'. There is no doubt that the said corrupt will win on tickets of Congress, BJP, DMK and AIADMK all. This is really not a party issue.

Agreed. Corruption is not a party issue. Irrespective of the parties it's omnipresent.. But fielding a candidate by a party who's facing serious corruption charges definitely shows that party in a poor light.

This shows not only the party but also voters in poor light. Why the party gives ticket to the 'corrupt'? This is because he will get votes and the 'honest' will not. Again, I may stress that the 'corrupt' really perform. The 'honest' may not even spend the local area development fund and do nothing. He will not help anyone generally. But the dishonest or corrupt will spend the local area funds and satisfy people even though he may also make some money for himself. The dishonest/ corrupt will help people to get govt. job and people will be satisfied with him and evcen pay him for his such service. In short voters are happy with candidate who helps them and unhappy with one who does nothing. corruption does not matter. In villages, liquer and other items are gifted and voters happily accept these and vote for the 'corrupt'. The corrupt voters will elect only corrupt leader.

That's true. Like people like leader. Electorate awareness is yet to come of age in India. But I'm sure there will be a change sooner than later. For the same reason EC has made this time elaborate awareness programmes highlighting the registration of names like never before.

Awareness programme will help voters know that they must vote and vote responsibly. But this will not make them less selfish. why you vote on caste basis? This is bcause your own caste leader is expected to favor you more. why you work for the corrupt? Thjis is because despite corruption, he is helpful to voters. Voters are also corrupt. They will not bother about honesty partcularly if you are not of help to people for their right or wrong jobs. People often go to MPs and MLAs for many favors and are also willing to pay for the favor. This explains why many candidates win even when they are in jail.

The question is why the tainted politicians get tickets. This only goes to show 'corruption' is not really issue with people. The 'tainted' and 'corrupt' have more chances to win. Is not so, no party would give them tickets. Ao where does the fault lies? It is no use blaming politicians. Instead blame voters.

Actually people want work and they know that the 'clean and honest' are really rootless, spineless, useless and good for nothing. They have recently seen this in Delhi where the first ever goverment by 'clean and honest' Kejriwal led AAP failed to perform and quit. This is so everywhere. You may tolerate a dishonest servant who performs but will sack ther honest one who is useless and performs nothing. It is necessary to ponder why the 'corrupt and trainted' win election inspite of all adverse publicity.

People are aware about the "Performance" factor of the congress. That's why it has been shown the gate. The party which did nothing but harmed the people for 12 long years is not an exact definition of Performance.

For people, 'performance' is not same as 'corruption'. Congress and BJP both have given tickets to 'tainted'. There is no doubt that the said corrupt will win on tickets of Congress, BJP, DMK and AIADMK all. This is really not a party issue.

Agreed. Corruption is not a party issue. Irrespective of the parties it's omnipresent.. But fielding a candidate by a party who's facing serious corruption charges definitely shows that party in a poor light.

This shows not only the party but also voters in poor light. Why the party gives ticket to the 'corrupt'? This is because he will get votes and the 'honest' will not. Again, I may stress that the 'corrupt' really perform. The 'honest' may not even spend the local area development fund and do nothing. He will not help anyone generally. But the dishonest or corrupt will spend the local area funds and satisfy people even though he may also make some money for himself. The dishonest/ corrupt will help people to get govt. job and people will be satisfied with him and evcen pay him for his such service. In short voters are happy with candidate who helps them and unhappy with one who does nothing. corruption does not matter. In villages, liquer and other items are gifted and voters happily accept these and vote for the 'corrupt'. The corrupt voters will elect only corrupt leader.

That's true. Like people like leader. Electorate awareness is yet to come of age in India. But I'm sure there will be a change sooner than later. For the same reason EC has made this time elaborate awareness programmes highlighting the registration of names like never before.

Awareness programme will help voters know that they must vote and vote responsibly. But this will not make them less selfish. why you vote on caste basis? This is bcause your own caste leader is expected to favor you more. why you work for the corrupt? Thjis is because despite corruption, he is helpful to voters. Voters are also corrupt. They will not bother about honesty partcularly if you are not of help to people for their right or wrong jobs. People often go to MPs and MLAs for many favors and are also willing to pay for the favor. This explains why many candidates win even when they are in jail.

If the people are unwilling to learn they deserve A Ravan's Rule. None can save them

The question is why the tainted politicians get tickets. This only goes to show 'corruption' is not really issue with people. The 'tainted' and 'corrupt' have more chances to win. Is not so, no party would give them tickets. Ao where does the fault lies? It is no use blaming politicians. Instead blame voters.

Actually people want work and they know that the 'clean and honest' are really rootless, spineless, useless and good for nothing. They have recently seen this in Delhi where the first ever goverment by 'clean and honest' Kejriwal led AAP failed to perform and quit. This is so everywhere. You may tolerate a dishonest servant who performs but will sack ther honest one who is useless and performs nothing. It is necessary to ponder why the 'corrupt and trainted' win election inspite of all adverse publicity.

People are aware about the "Performance" factor of the congress. That's why it has been shown the gate. The party which did nothing but harmed the people for 12 long years is not an exact definition of Performance.

For people, 'performance' is not same as 'corruption'. Congress and BJP both have given tickets to 'tainted'. There is no doubt that the said corrupt will win on tickets of Congress, BJP, DMK and AIADMK all. This is really not a party issue.

Agreed. Corruption is not a party issue. Irrespective of the parties it's omnipresent.. But fielding a candidate by a party who's facing serious corruption charges definitely shows that party in a poor light.

This shows not only the party but also voters in poor light. Why the party gives ticket to the 'corrupt'? This is because he will get votes and the 'honest' will not. Again, I may stress that the 'corrupt' really perform. The 'honest' may not even spend the local area development fund and do nothing. He will not help anyone generally. But the dishonest or corrupt will spend the local area funds and satisfy people even though he may also make some money for himself. The dishonest/ corrupt will help people to get govt. job and people will be satisfied with him and evcen pay him for his such service. In short voters are happy with candidate who helps them and unhappy with one who does nothing. corruption does not matter. In villages, liquer and other items are gifted and voters happily accept these and vote for the 'corrupt'. The corrupt voters will elect only corrupt leader.

That's true. Like people like leader. Electorate awareness is yet to come of age in India. But I'm sure there will be a change sooner than later. For the same reason EC has made this time elaborate awareness programmes highlighting the registration of names like never before.

Awareness programme will help voters know that they must vote and vote responsibly. But this will not make them less selfish. why you vote on caste basis? This is bcause your own caste leader is expected to favor you more. why you work for the corrupt? Thjis is because despite corruption, he is helpful to voters. Voters are also corrupt. They will not bother about honesty partcularly if you are not of help to people for their right or wrong jobs. People often go to MPs and MLAs for many favors and are also willing to pay for the favor. This explains why many candidates win even when they are in jail.

If the people are unwilling to learn they deserve A Ravan's Rule. None can save them

'Ravan's rule' is amusing. Really ravan's lanka was very prosperous. That is why this was called 'sone ki lanka'. People definitely do not like an ideal state or Ram Rajya or a corruption free India. Apparently, most people adjust. There are not only few politicians and industrialists who gain by corruption. There is a big army of 'social workers' , 'political agents' , bureaucrats and others who gain from corrupt practices. They are also more powerful. It is true that there are many poor and low income people who suffer from high prices and corruption. But as long as they are not conscious or less educated, they also just bear their misfortune. Moreover, when they get some ducation and learn the way, they also do not try to bring the change. Rather they also try to adjust with the system and join the army of corrupt elements rather than changing. In Ravan's rule also, peole liked his rule and there were few dissenters like Vibheeshan. Howevr, Vibheeshan was agent of foreignor 'Rama'.

The question is why the tainted politicians get tickets. This only goes to show 'corruption' is not really issue with people. The 'tainted' and 'corrupt' have more chances to win. Is not so, no party would give them tickets. Ao where does the fault lies? It is no use blaming politicians. Instead blame voters.

Actually people want work and they know that the 'clean and honest' are really rootless, spineless, useless and good for nothing. They have recently seen this in Delhi where the first ever goverment by 'clean and honest' Kejriwal led AAP failed to perform and quit. This is so everywhere. You may tolerate a dishonest servant who performs but will sack ther honest one who is useless and performs nothing. It is necessary to ponder why the 'corrupt and trainted' win election inspite of all adverse publicity.

People are aware about the "Performance" factor of the congress. That's why it has been shown the gate. The party which did nothing but harmed the people for 12 long years is not an exact definition of Performance.

For people, 'performance' is not same as 'corruption'. Congress and BJP both have given tickets to 'tainted'. There is no doubt that the said corrupt will win on tickets of Congress, BJP, DMK and AIADMK all. This is really not a party issue.

Agreed. Corruption is not a party issue. Irrespective of the parties it's omnipresent.. But fielding a candidate by a party who's facing serious corruption charges definitely shows that party in a poor light.

This shows not only the party but also voters in poor light. Why the party gives ticket to the 'corrupt'? This is because he will get votes and the 'honest' will not. Again, I may stress that the 'corrupt' really perform. The 'honest' may not even spend the local area development fund and do nothing. He will not help anyone generally. But the dishonest or corrupt will spend the local area funds and satisfy people even though he may also make some money for himself. The dishonest/ corrupt will help people to get govt. job and people will be satisfied with him and evcen pay him for his such service. In short voters are happy with candidate who helps them and unhappy with one who does nothing. corruption does not matter. In villages, liquer and other items are gifted and voters happily accept these and vote for the 'corrupt'. The corrupt voters will elect only corrupt leader.

That's true. Like people like leader. Electorate awareness is yet to come of age in India. But I'm sure there will be a change sooner than later. For the same reason EC has made this time elaborate awareness programmes highlighting the registration of names like never before.

Awareness programme will help voters know that they must vote and vote responsibly. But this will not make them less selfish. why you vote on caste basis? This is bcause your own caste leader is expected to favor you more. why you work for the corrupt? Thjis is because despite corruption, he is helpful to voters. Voters are also corrupt. They will not bother about honesty partcularly if you are not of help to people for their right or wrong jobs. People often go to MPs and MLAs for many favors and are also willing to pay for the favor. This explains why many candidates win even when they are in jail.

If the people are unwilling to learn they deserve A Ravan's Rule. None can save them

'Ravan's rule' is amusing. Really ravan's lanka was very prosperous. That is why this was called 'sone ki lanka'. People definitely do not like an ideal state or Ram Rajya or a corruption free India. Apparently, most people adjust. There are not only few politicians and industrialists who gain by corruption. There is a big army of 'social workers' , 'political agents' , bureaucrats and others who gain from corrupt practices. They are also more powerful. It is true that there are many poor and low income people who suffer from high prices and corruption. But as long as they are not conscious or less educated, they also just bear their misfortune. Moreover, when they get some ducation and learn the way, they also do not try to bring the change. Rather they also try to adjust with the system and join the army of corrupt elements rather than changing. In Ravan's rule also, peole liked his rule and there were few dissenters like Vibheeshan. Howevr, Vibheeshan was agent of foreignor 'Rama'.

I agree. The mainstay of democracy is People.If people are indifferent and insensitive nothing will happen.

It is the killer instinct which separates winner from loser, winning is important and the means to achieve goal is not, winner is always been praised by everybody not losers so winning by any means should be the anthem of political parties as well as for all activities.

It is the killer instinct which separates winner from loser, winning is important and the means to achieve goal is not, winner is always been praised by everybody not losers so winning by any means should be the anthem of political parties as well as for all activities.

Winning is OK But winning by walking on the corpses and stooping down lowest levels is both crooked and mean