Is Destruction necessary to bring peace?

2.5K Views
0 Replies
1 min read

Krishna tells arjun to destroy the evil and wrong people with a brave heart. This also bring destruction to thousands of innocent people. To demolish few bad things, was that right to destroy the whole mankind. If God can do any thing, could not he find a better and peaceful way to demolish bad people and bad things.

1 Likes

18 Replies

@Ramkrishnan

You got the point SIR, why god didnt try to prevent that war as he is supposed to do anything? Lord Krishna was not God but a God incarnate and he had limitations to take decisions. This means every thing happens by its own karma and God has no role in our lives.

God or otherwise, how and why it's justified to remain as a silent spectator when evil forces are unleashing the terror and mayhem ? Even a good Samaritan cannot keep himself aloof when something that threatens the normal life.

If God cant prevent destruction even in satyog and has to be a silent spectator at that time and what is the role of God...

 

Why one should wait for the God and intervene, when man himself is capable of sorting out the things ?

 

We expect too much..., we expect God to come and relive us from even headachesunglasses.png 

Neha Sadana wrote:

We expect too much..., we expect God to come and relive us from even headachesunglasses.png

 

Who else if not God...after all he is the root cause of every headache too man_with_turban.png 

 

God created Man. Provided all the resources within him. He wanted man should become strong and self sufficient. Remember God helps those who help themselves. Don't think god comes from the blue and blesses you without putting his own efforts. In fact God will be happy to see his creation emerging as strong and sturdy.

 

God is the creator, we all are his creation. Thats it.. we expect, we blame him, all due to our emotional dependency. We need someone to lean on, someone to blame and someone to rescue us. May be trait of a human being.

What is good and what is evil. Nobody says that he is on side of evil.  The wars are not for ending evil. These are for some self interest- good or evil. The Mahabharat war was also for some personal and self interest of Pandavas and Kauravas.  Good or evil can always be interpreted any way. 

Ultimately, lasting poace requires that disputes be settled amicable and throug conciliation. It is not necessary that truth and virtue always triumphs. Evil can also win. Mythologically,  the asurs (devils) defeated the surs O(gods) several times. The fight between good and evil (interpreted according to vested interests) never ends. 

The incident of Asuras winning over Suras is a temporary triumph. Truth triumphs always. May be in a delayed manner.

 

rambabu wrote:

The incident of Asuras winning over Suras is a temporary triumph. Truth triumphs always. May be in a delayed manner.

 

Time is never ending. So there is nothing like ulktimate triumph. To elucidate, you are winner today. You may say this is ultiamate. Two years later another may win and he will say that his victory is ultimate. This goes on. In final analysis, nothing is ultimate. Moreover, good and evil are undefined. everyone would interpret according to self interest.  

 

 

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
rambabu wrote:

The incident of Asuras winning over Suras is a temporary triumph. Truth triumphs always. May be in a delayed manner.

 

Time is never ending. So there is nothing like ulktimate triumph. To elucidate, you are winner today. You may say this is ultiamate. Two years later another may win and he will say that his victory is ultimate. This goes on. In final analysis, nothing is ultimate. Moreover, good and evil are undefined. everyone would interpret according to self interest.  

We evaluate everything in accordance with the existing norms. The incident of Asuras being defeated by Suras took place in Puranic age. Even today it is relevant, driving home the point that Truth triumphs ultimately. At least until today, this saying is applicable.

 

 

 

rambabu wrote:

The incident of Asuras winning over Suras is a temporary triumph. Truth triumphs always. May be in a delayed manner.

 

But then who is sure about existence of Asuras and Devas, so I would prefer to judge what is good or bad for myself.

 

 

suni51 wrote:
rambabu wrote:

The incident of Asuras winning over Suras is a temporary triumph. Truth triumphs always. May be in a delayed manner.

 

But then who is sure about existence of Asuras and Devas, so I would prefer to judge what is good or bad for myself.

that is still good. Your own discrimination stands by you.

 

 

 

As darkness cannot be completely removed, bad things also cannot be removed completely from the earth till life exists on it. If good ones exist then bad one will also exist on earth. It is true that there should be balance between good and bad. If bad things exceed over good ones, then destruction is necessary to keep balance.

Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:

As darkness cannot be completely removed, bad things also cannot be removed completely from the earth till life exists on it. If good ones exist then bad one will also exist on earth. It is true that there should be balance between good and bad. If bad things exceed over good ones, then destruction is necessary to keep balance.

Agreed.  when a situation occurs wherein bad outnumber the Good, it is necessary to curb the bad. And in this process destruction is imminent.

 

rambabu wrote:
Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:

As darkness cannot be completely removed, bad things also cannot be removed completely from the earth till life exists on it. If good ones exist then bad one will also exist on earth. It is true that there should be balance between good and bad. If bad things exceed over good ones, then destruction is necessary to keep balance.

Agreed.  when a situation occurs wherein bad outnumber the Good, it is necessary to curb the bad. And in this process destruction is imminent.

And this process will continue till there is life exist on earth. Sometime bad will overcome, and destruction will occur to balance bad with good. 

 

Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:

As darkness cannot be completely removed, bad things also cannot be removed completely from the earth till life exists on it. If good ones exist then bad one will also exist on earth. It is true that there should be balance between good and bad. If bad things exceed over good ones, then destruction is necessary to keep balance.

Agreed.  when a situation occurs wherein bad outnumber the Good, it is necessary to curb the bad. And in this process destruction is imminent.

And this process will continue till there is life exist on earth. Sometime bad will overcome, and destruction will occur to balance bad with good. 

Yes. Whenever such situation arises, it leads to conflict and conflict leads to employing destructive methods.

 

 

Topic Author

N

Neha Sadana

@NehaSadana

Topic Stats

Created Tuesday, 08 September 2015 06:51
Last Updated Tuesday, 08 September 2015 06:52
Replies 0
Views 2.5K
Likes 1

Share This Topic