Open Means Open Means
- Boddunan.com Updates - - Announcements - - Contests & Rewards - - Group Discussions - Discussions - - General Discussions - - Improving English Writing Skills - - Q n A - Find answers to your questions - - Daily Dose - - Topics of Interest - - - Current Affairs & Latest News - - - Education & Learning - - - Humor & Jokes - - - Movies & Entertainment - Your Vote Counts - - Feedback - - Suggestion Box - Shoutbox - - Introduce Yourself - - The Lounge - - Help - - Testimonials
Judicial accountability or judicial freedom
in General Discussions
The chief Justice has cautioned against over zeal in Judicial Accounting Bill that seeks to curb corruption in judiciary. The chief Justice opines that judicial accountability should not be takes so far as to destroy judicial freedom or autonomy.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/judicial-bill-must-not-curb-freedom-chief-justice-of-india/articleshow/15509627.cms

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

  • 0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    • Add Favorite Report
    Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
    Every one is ineterested to safeguard there own rights so if th CJ is doing so there is nothing wrong in that.

    I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work

    https://o0.nz/

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    The Chief Justice has rightly uttered a word of caution in this regard. Be it in the name of accountability or any other phraseology, any attempt to curb judicial freedom would be a mortal blow to effective functioning of democracy in India. The political class wants to see changes in everybody excepting itself. In this scenario when the judiciary in India has been gloriously successful in exposing the seamy side of our national life,I would support and advise extreme caution in this regard.
    Thank you said by: Gulshan Kumar Ajmani
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    The Chief Justice has rightly uttered a word of caution in this regard. Be it in the name of accountability or any other phraseology, any attempt to curb judicial freedom would be a mortal blow to effective functioning of democracy in India. The political class wants to see changes in everybody excepting itself. In this scenario when the judiciary in India has been gloriously successful in exposing the seamy side of our national life,I would support and advise extreme caution in this regard.


    There was a lively debate yesterday on the television about the role of judiciary , this was in context with Mamata Bannerji's comments on the justice system and some of the view points were interesting in that although what Mamata said was not wrong since she was generalising that justice can be bought for money, which I guess even the common citizens would sometimes say...However,how right is it for a CM to make such an observation of the very system that she is a part of ...

    Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    The Chief Justice has rightly uttered a word of caution in this regard. Be it in the name of accountability or any other phraseology, any attempt to curb judicial freedom would be a mortal blow to effective functioning of democracy in India. The political class wants to see changes in everybody excepting itself. In this scenario when the judiciary in India has been gloriously successful in exposing the seamy side of our national life,I would support and advise extreme caution in this regard.


    There was a lively debate yesterday on the television about the role of judiciary , this was in context with Mamata Bannerji's comments on the justice system and some of the view points were interesting in that although what Mamata said was not wrong since she was generalising that justice can be bought for money, which I guess even the common citizens would sometimes say...However,how right is it for a CM to make such an observation of the very system that she is a part of ...


    If Mamata Banerjee has not named any particular Judge or court but simply pointed out drawback and corruption in judiciary, there is nothing wrong.

    G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
    http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    The Chief Justice has rightly uttered a word of caution in this regard. Be it in the name of accountability or any other phraseology, any attempt to curb judicial freedom would be a mortal blow to effective functioning of democracy in India. The political class wants to see changes in everybody excepting itself. In this scenario when the judiciary in India has been gloriously successful in exposing the seamy side of our national life,I would support and advise extreme caution in this regard.


    There was a lively debate yesterday on the television about the role of judiciary , this was in context with Mamata Bannerji's comments on the justice system and some of the view points were interesting in that although what Mamata said was not wrong since she was generalising that justice can be bought for money, which I guess even the common citizens would sometimes say...However,how right is it for a CM to make such an observation of the very system that she is a part of ...


    If Mamata Banerjee has not named any particular Judge or court but simply pointed out drawback and corruption in judiciary, there is nothing wrong.


    I firmly believe that she has a point but in this instance she might have overstepped the line. Even if you don't name any particular judge,you defame the system of which judges are a part!
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    The Chief Justice has rightly uttered a word of caution in this regard. Be it in the name of accountability or any other phraseology, any attempt to curb judicial freedom would be a mortal blow to effective functioning of democracy in India. The political class wants to see changes in everybody excepting itself. In this scenario when the judiciary in India has been gloriously successful in exposing the seamy side of our national life,I would support and advise extreme caution in this regard.


    There was a lively debate yesterday on the television about the role of judiciary , this was in context with Mamata Bannerji's comments on the justice system and some of the view points were interesting in that although what Mamata said was not wrong since she was generalising that justice can be bought for money, which I guess even the common citizens would sometimes say...However,how right is it for a CM to make such an observation of the very system that she is a part of ...


    If Mamata Banerjee has not named any particular Judge or court but simply pointed out drawback and corruption in judiciary, there is nothing wrong.


    I firmly believe that she has a point but in this instance she might have overstepped the line. Even if you don't name any particular judge,you defame the system of which judges are a part!


    She has been overstepping the limit far too often these days with utter disregard for people... No doubt that she is a mass leader who does deliver when it is a matter of common and poorer sections of the society....Surprisingly, yesterday in a poll that was conducted by a news channel, her popularity has actually gone up now that it was before,this inspite of all the controversies surrounding her :huh:

    Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    The Chief Justice has rightly uttered a word of caution in this regard. Be it in the name of accountability or any other phraseology, any attempt to curb judicial freedom would be a mortal blow to effective functioning of democracy in India. The political class wants to see changes in everybody excepting itself. In this scenario when the judiciary in India has been gloriously successful in exposing the seamy side of our national life,I would support and advise extreme caution in this regard.


    There was a lively debate yesterday on the television about the role of judiciary , this was in context with Mamata Bannerji's comments on the justice system and some of the view points were interesting in that although what Mamata said was not wrong since she was generalising that justice can be bought for money, which I guess even the common citizens would sometimes say...However,how right is it for a CM to make such an observation of the very system that she is a part of ...


    If Mamata Banerjee has not named any particular Judge or court but simply pointed out drawback and corruption in judiciary, there is nothing wrong.


    I firmly believe that she has a point but in this instance she might have overstepped the line. Even if you don't name any particular judge,you defame the system of which judges are a part!


    She has been overstepping the limit far too often these days with utter disregard for people... No doubt that she is a mass leader who does deliver when it is a matter of common and poorer sections of the society....Surprisingly, yesterday in a poll that was conducted by a news channel, her popularity has actually gone up now that it was before,this inspite of all the controversies surrounding her :huh:


    Whatever I have observed about her over the years, it's her honesty and plain-speak which are very very rare traits in today's politicians in India- have endeared her to the masses. As far as gaining popularity on this issue - the experience of the common people while dealing with judiciary at the lowest rung is not a happy one and this section has overwhelmingly approved her statement.
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    The matter of defaming judiciary by Mamata Banerjee is now subjudice. mamata banerjee has accused media of misrepresenting her statement. The court will decide taking in view actual facts.

    http://zeenews.india.com/news/west-bengal/hc-moved-against-mamatas-corrupt-judiciary-remark_793900.html

    http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/calcutta-high-court-to-review-mamata-banerjee-s-statement-against-judiciary-255336

    http://ibnlive.in.com/generalnewsfeed/news/judicial-freedom-wont-be-undermined-by-proposed-law-khurshid/1044641.html

    http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_didi-blames-media-for-bribe-slur-on-judges_1728965

    G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
    http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    The matter of defaming judiciary by Mamata Banerjee is now subjudice. mamata banerjee has accused media of misrepresenting her statement. The court will decide taking in view actual facts.

    http://zeenews.india.com/news/west-bengal/hc-moved-against-mamatas-corrupt-judiciary-remark_793900.html

    http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/calcutta-high-court-to-review-mamata-banerjee-s-statement-against-judiciary-255336

    http://ibnlive.in.com/generalnewsfeed/news/judicial-freedom-wont-be-undermined-by-proposed-law-khurshid/1044641.html

    http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_didi-blames-media-for-bribe-slur-on-judges_1728965


    I saw the entire debate yesterday as to the legal implications, which was very interesting...Everyone seemed to agree on one point that she was not wrong in pointing out the wrongs committed by the justice department ...

    http://www.timesnow.tv/Debate-Mamata-Banerjee-reverses-justice-3/videoshow/4400087.cms

    Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    The Chief Justice has rightly uttered a word of caution in this regard. Be it in the name of accountability or any other phraseology, any attempt to curb judicial freedom would be a mortal blow to effective functioning of democracy in India. The political class wants to see changes in everybody excepting itself. In this scenario when the judiciary in India has been gloriously successful in exposing the seamy side of our national life,I would support and advise extreme caution in this regard.


    There was a lively debate yesterday on the television about the role of judiciary , this was in context with Mamata Bannerji's comments on the justice system and some of the view points were interesting in that although what Mamata said was not wrong since she was generalising that justice can be bought for money, which I guess even the common citizens would sometimes say...However,how right is it for a CM to make such an observation of the very system that she is a part of ...


    If Mamata Banerjee has not named any particular Judge or court but simply pointed out drawback and corruption in judiciary, there is nothing wrong.


    I firmly believe that she has a point but in this instance she might have overstepped the line. Even if you don't name any particular judge,you defame the system of which judges are a part!



    Either you may not say anything about administration and judiciary or you have to give your views honestly.. There is nothing wrong in pointing out the lapses and corruption in any organization or system. The only check is that any particular person or office should not be directly pointed out. everyone has his own language or style. I don't think that the West Bengal c.M. used any abusive or insulting language.

    G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
    http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.
    Related Topics
    Title Category Replies
    What are the impacts of modern technology on family communication? Discussions 0
    Women should get to wear whatever they want! General Discussions 0
    Understanding What Education Is? Discussions 0
    Whose birthdate is a lucky ? General Discussions 0
    importance of skill Topics of Interest 0

    Forum Categories

    Trending Topics