All civilized countries are governed by rule of law as against rule of whim. In ancient days, word of king was law. It goes to Britis that they introduced ule of law in India. happily now Chinese also intend to go by rule of law.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/Communist-Party-of-China-begins-annual-plenum-with-rule-of-law/articleshow/44893829.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

All civilized countries are governed by rule of law as against rule of whim. In ancient days, word of king was law. It goes to Britis that they introduced ule of law in India. happily now Chinese also intend to go by rule of law.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/Communist-Party-of-China-begins-annual-plenum-with-rule-of-law/articleshow/44893829.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

There is no way out. They will have to come to terms sooner than later.

All civilized countries are governed by rule of law as against rule of whim. In ancient days, word of king was law. It goes to Britis that they introduced ule of law in India. happily now Chinese also intend to go by rule of law.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/Communist-Party-of-China-begins-annual-plenum-with-rule-of-law/articleshow/44893829.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

There is no way out. They will have to come to terms sooner than later.

yo
How long will a billion plus people be kept under non democratic  rule

All civilized countries are governed by rule of law as against rule of whim. In ancient days, word of king was law. It goes to Britis that they introduced ule of law in India. happily now Chinese also intend to go by rule of law.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/Communist-Party-of-China-begins-annual-plenum-with-rule-of-law/articleshow/44893829.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

There is no way out. They will have to come to terms sooner than later.

yo
How long will a billion plus people be kept under non democratic  rule

Dmocracy is best. But rue of law3 is not necessarily dmocracy. Rule of law means absence of arbitrariness. British introduced rule of law in India. Rule of law means that as ong as you go by rules. you need not fear.

All civilized countries are governed by rule of law as against rule of whim. In ancient days, word of king was law. It goes to Britis that they introduced ule of law in India. happily now Chinese also intend to go by rule of law.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/Communist-Party-of-China-begins-annual-plenum-with-rule-of-law/articleshow/44893829.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

There is no way out. They will have to come to terms sooner than later.

yo
How long will a billion plus people be kept under non democratic  rule

Dmocracy is best. But rue of law3 is not necessarily dmocracy. Rule of law means absence of arbitrariness. British introduced rule of law in India. Rule of law means that as ong as you go by rules. you need not fear.

But in China rules are made by a few for everyone and in democracy rules are made by everyone for everyone. China has to give way to democracy sooner or later. It is generating fantastic economy which needs to be shared by every Chinese and not only the very limited handful of Communist Party members.

All civilized countries are governed by rule of law as against rule of whim. In ancient days, word of king was law. It goes to Britis that they introduced ule of law in India. happily now Chinese also intend to go by rule of law.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/Communist-Party-of-China-begins-annual-plenum-with-rule-of-law/articleshow/44893829.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

There is no way out. They will have to come to terms sooner than later.

yo
How long will a billion plus people be kept under non democratic  rule

Dmocracy is best. But rue of law3 is not necessarily dmocracy. Rule of law means absence of arbitrariness. British introduced rule of law in India. Rule of law means that as ong as you go by rules. you need not fear.

But in China rules are made by a few for everyone and in democracy rules are made by everyone for everyone. China has to give way to democracy sooner or later. It is generating fantastic economy which needs to be shared by every Chinese and not only the very limited handful of Communist Party members.

Or the result will be same as it happened in erstwhile USSR The Russia

All civilized countries are governed by rule of law as against rule of whim. In ancient days, word of king was law. It goes to Britis that they introduced ule of law in India. happily now Chinese also intend to go by rule of law.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/Communist-Party-of-China-begins-annual-plenum-with-rule-of-law/articleshow/44893829.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

There is no way out. They will have to come to terms sooner than later.

yo
How long will a billion plus people be kept under non democratic  rule

Dmocracy is best. But rue of law3 is not necessarily dmocracy. Rule of law means absence of arbitrariness. British introduced rule of law in India. Rule of law means that as ong as you go by rules. you need not fear.

But in China rules are made by a few for everyone and in democracy rules are made by everyone for everyone. China has to give way to democracy sooner or later. It is generating fantastic economy which needs to be shared by every Chinese and not only the very limited handful of Communist Party members.

Or the result will be same as it happened in erstwhile USSR The Russia

I was thinking the same thing - the very definition of Marxism makes communism a losing proposition since change is inevitable and no situation can be permanent. No system is perfect either since all systems come with loopholes including democracy which is probably the best option we have as of now...China is already leaning towards socialism which is one step forward and sooner than later Democracy is bound to become a way of life there as well...

All civilized countries are governed by rule of law as against rule of whim. In ancient days, word of king was law. It goes to Britis that they introduced ule of law in India. happily now Chinese also intend to go by rule of law.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/Communist-Party-of-China-begins-annual-plenum-with-rule-of-law/articleshow/44893829.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

There is no way out. They will have to come to terms sooner than later.

yo
How long will a billion plus people be kept under non democratic  rule

Dmocracy is best. But rue of law3 is not necessarily dmocracy. Rule of law means absence of arbitrariness. British introduced rule of law in India. Rule of law means that as ong as you go by rules. you need not fear.

But in China rules are made by a few for everyone and in democracy rules are made by everyone for everyone. China has to give way to democracy sooner or later. It is generating fantastic economy which needs to be shared by every Chinese and not only the very limited handful of Communist Party members.

Or the result will be same as it happened in erstwhile USSR The Russia

I was thinking the same thing - the very definition of Marxism makes communism a losing proposition since change is inevitable and no situation can be permanent. No system is perfect either since all systems come with loopholes including democracy which is probably the best option we have as of now...China is already leaning towards socialism which is one step forward and sooner than later Democracy is bound to become a way of life there as well...

The Soviet Union came to existence after uprooting the Tzarist dictatorship. so far, nowhere Communists have replaced demorcracy. Pt Nehru our first Prime minister aimed at democracy and socialism both. Democracy and dictatorship are forms whereas communism, socialism or capitalism are content. Basically, communism is democratic as this means economic welfare of workers or masses. Capitalism is undemocratic as this means rule of the few big capitalists even though the form may be democratic. It goes to credit of Pt Nehru that he aimed at democracy in content and form both. He hence came with unique view of 'democratic socialism' or 'socialistic pattern of society'.

All civilized countries are governed by rule of law as against rule of whim. In ancient days, word of king was law. It goes to Britis that they introduced ule of law in India. happily now Chinese also intend to go by rule of law.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/Communist-Party-of-China-begins-annual-plenum-with-rule-of-law/articleshow/44893829.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

There is no way out. They will have to come to terms sooner than later.

yo
How long will a billion plus people be kept under non democratic  rule

Dmocracy is best. But rue of law3 is not necessarily dmocracy. Rule of law means absence of arbitrariness. British introduced rule of law in India. Rule of law means that as ong as you go by rules. you need not fear.

But in China rules are made by a few for everyone and in democracy rules are made by everyone for everyone. China has to give way to democracy sooner or later. It is generating fantastic economy which needs to be shared by every Chinese and not only the very limited handful of Communist Party members.

Or the result will be same as it happened in erstwhile USSR The Russia

I was thinking the same thing - the very definition of Marxism makes communism a losing proposition since change is inevitable and no situation can be permanent. No system is perfect either since all systems come with loopholes including democracy which is probably the best option we have as of now...China is already leaning towards socialism which is one step forward and sooner than later Democracy is bound to become a way of life there as well...

The Soviet Union came to existence after uprooting the Tzarist dictatorship. so far, nowhere Communists have replaced demorcracy. Pt Nehru our first Prime minister aimed at democracy and socialism both. Democracy and dictatorship are forms whereas communism, socialism or capitalism are content. Basically, communism is democratic as this means economic welfare of workers or masses. Capitalism is undemocratic as this means rule of the few big capitalists even though the form may be democratic. It goes to credit of Pt Nehru that he aimed at democracy in content and form both. He hence came with unique view of 'democratic socialism' or 'socialistic pattern of society'.

All civilized countries are governed by rule of law as against rule of whim. In ancient days, word of king was law. It goes to Britis that they introduced ule of law in India. happily now Chinese also intend to go by rule of law.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/Communist-Party-of-China-begins-annual-plenum-with-rule-of-law/articleshow/44893829.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

There is no way out. They will have to come to terms sooner than later.

yo
How long will a billion plus people be kept under non democratic  rule

Dmocracy is best. But rue of law3 is not necessarily dmocracy. Rule of law means absence of arbitrariness. British introduced rule of law in India. Rule of law means that as ong as you go by rules. you need not fear.

But in China rules are made by a few for everyone and in democracy rules are made by everyone for everyone. China has to give way to democracy sooner or later. It is generating fantastic economy which needs to be shared by every Chinese and not only the very limited handful of Communist Party members.

Or the result will be same as it happened in erstwhile USSR The Russia

I was thinking the same thing - the very definition of Marxism makes communism a losing proposition since change is inevitable and no situation can be permanent. No system is perfect either since all systems come with loopholes including democracy which is probably the best option we have as of now...China is already leaning towards socialism which is one step forward and sooner than later Democracy is bound to become a way of life there as well...

The Soviet Union came to existence after uprooting the Tzarist dictatorship. so far, nowhere Communists have replaced demorcracy. Pt Nehru our first Prime minister aimed at democracy and socialism both. Democracy and dictatorship are forms whereas communism, socialism or capitalism are content. Basically, communism is democratic as this means economic welfare of workers or masses. Capitalism is undemocratic as this means rule of the few big capitalists even though the form may be democratic. It goes to credit of Pt Nehru that he aimed at democracy in content and form both. He hence came with unique view of 'democratic socialism' or 'socialistic pattern of society'.

It is a well known and well established fact that Nehrus so called experiment with Socio Democracy was a total failure and his daughter took it further since she was an autocrat who was not ready to heed to advise even from experts on the field and institutionalising corruption - together they made a mess of things slowing down the growth for which we all have been paying the price !!1

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/edit-page/The-god-that-failed-Nehru-Indira-socialist-model-placed-India-in-precipitous-decline-relative-to-the-world/articleshow/26112532.cms