Sanjay Leela Bhansali beaten for distorting history!

Just as Sanjay Leela Bansali has no right to distort history like that, Karni sena members too don't have the rights to physically assault other person or resort to vandalism. If they are not happy with the way he has tried to distort history and dramatise the plot, they could take up other legal means.

jabeen wrote:

Just as Sanjay Leela Bansali has no right to distort history like that, Karni sena members too don't have the rights to physically assault other person or resort to vandalism. If they are not happy with the way he has tried to distort history and dramatise the plot, they could take up other legal means.

Now that Sanjay Leela Bhansali did not distort the History has been proved. Now, about Karni Sena physically assaulting Sanjay and resorting to vandalism is an unlawful act. The said Karni Sena, instead of taking up the issue to the right agency, the Sena took the law in to its hands. Such acts should be condemned.

Why single out Rajput and Jat? Anyone can react in the same way if portrayed in a wrong way.  

jabeen wrote:

Just as Sanjay Leela Bansali has no right to distort history like that, Karni sena members too don't have the rights to physically assault other person or resort to vandalism. If they are not happy with the way he has tried to distort history and dramatise the plot, they could take up other legal means.

I too feel that no matter what the provocation is , one should not resort to physical abuse of any kind. However, Sanjay Leela Bhansali has always distorted history to suit his perception and box office requirements and he was planning to do so here as well..Now hopefully he would be careful realising how enraged people become when undue liberties are taken with their culture and traditions!

If censor board clears why should still there be oppositio. then fringe groups only should decide.

vijay wrote:

If censor board clears why should still there be oppositio. then fringe groups only should decide.

It happened when the movie was in production stage.

suni51 wrote:

Why single out Rajput and Jat? Anyone can react in the same way if portrayed in a wrong way.  

Because they seem to have relatively  maximum misgivings about every other issue.

rambabu wrote:

Now, Karni Sena is slammed by Sanjay's colleagues, Bollywood Sena..

http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/01/27/padmavati-attack-bollywood-stars-slam-karni-sena-for-assaulti/?utm_hp_ref=in-homepage

After all Sanjay is big film maker, every bollowood stars like to please him. It is only spoonism.

rambabu wrote:

vijay wrote:

Avalanche killings are natural while Bhansali episode is man made. Former is not controlable while latter is. Therefore this hue and cry. All the time comparing applescand pears is not fair. 

Sanjay Leela Bhansali's issue was man made. especially by destructive elements. Time has come to erase the bad name created by the destructive elements. and  expose them.

Who is destructive elements? Karni Sena or sanjay's brigade.

anil wrote:

rambabu wrote:

Now, Karni Sena is slammed by Sanjay's colleagues, Bollywood Sena..

http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/01/27/padmavati-attack-bollywood-stars-slam-karni-sena-for-assaulti/?utm_hp_ref=in-homepage

After all Sanjay is big film maker, every bollowood stars like to please him. It is only spoonism.

Why every Bollywood star  likes to please Sanjay ? Because he is a Director of renown. But Here what all the Bollywood Stars shown is consolidation  against the beating of Sanjay and vandalize his sets that led to loss of property.

As per the article in TOI today nothing like Padmini's story as is famous has really happened. It is supposed to be a work of imagination written by a Sufi writer nearly 200 years after Padmini and Khilji lived. If true then why this furore. Why can not the government tell the true story. 

The Rajputs must look inward. They were the ones who were defeated by the Muslims and to keep their thrones they gave their daughters and princesses to Muslim harems. It was appeasement through that 3 letter word.This is documented by Jesuit priests who wrote during that period. This is the stark truth. I have written extensively on this subject and one can access them through google.

rambabu wrote:

anil wrote:

Sanjay bhansali is not right one. What is he telling absolutly rubbish. I read one full book on Padamavati. She is most beautiful and intelligent woman. She loved to much to her husband Rawal Ratan Singh. It is not fair practice that for a film some one telling rubbish thing. It may be possible that director like Sanjay say that Sita loves Rawana,

Yes Rani Padmavati was one of the greatest warrior of India. She single handedly fought against the Mughals and defeated ALlauddin Khilji

Pal, get your facts right. Read history  by Duff and Mongomerys " history of warfare"

MG Singh wrote:

rambabu wrote:

anil wrote:

Sanjay bhansali is not right one. What is he telling absolutly rubbish. I read one full book on Padamavati. She is most beautiful and intelligent woman. She loved to much to her husband Rawal Ratan Singh. It is not fair practice that for a film some one telling rubbish thing. It may be possible that director like Sanjay say that Sita loves Rawana,

Yes Rani Padmavati was one of the greatest warrior of India. She single handedly fought against the Mughals and defeated ALlauddin Khilji

Pal, get your facts right. Read history  by Duff and Mongomerys " history of warfare"

 In fact, I do not believe  Indian History Books written by any foreign  Historians. I believe in What Anil said about Padmavati who is from Rajasthan

Some friends are saying that Karni Sena has done wrong, the way it protest was wrong, they should have go to court and fought in a legal way. Now the question is has anyone in the past won any case against celebrity, we have seen Salman Khan's case, he got relief in each case, see Lalu Yadav and others.

A blog written by a so called historian on times of India at the appropriate time is hardly credible. The unfortunate part is the way intellectual Hindus are ready to lap up anything that shows their own community in a poor light even when there is credible fact otherwise ! Having said that , has this historian done any research on the truth of his own religion, for example the validity of Quran ? Does anyone have any proof all those things mentioned in Quran actually happened? When it is a matter of history there is written proof so why do these people tamper like they did with a rogue like Tipu Sultan simply to show him as a great soul and now Allauddin Kilgi who was one of the most violent rulers ever. The protest was right but the means tney adapted was wrong ..

Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:

Some friends are saying that Karni Sena has done wrong, the way it protest was wrong, they should have go to court and fought in a legal way. Now the question is has anyone in the past won any case against celebrity, we have seen Salman Khan's case, he got relief in each case, see Lalu Yadav and others.

Now Salman says that the Black Buck died of natural causes

http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/01/27/salman-khan-claims-blackbuck-died-of-natural-causes-and-twitter/?utm_hp_ref=in-homepage

 

Since questions are being raised by members on the authenticity of Rani Padmini very existence let us read some more blogs that throw more light on the issue. ..Very interesting and informative as well !

http://postcard.news/must-read-open-letter-padmavati-director-mr-sanjay-leela-bhansali/

Thanks for the Link. The fact that Khilji neversaw Rani Padmavati with his own eyes ever astonished me.. So, it is understood that, Sanjay Leela Bhansal distorted the History .

rambabu wrote:

Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:

Some friends are saying that Karni Sena has done wrong, the way it protest was wrong, they should have go to court and fought in a legal way. Now the question is has anyone in the past won any case against celebrity, we have seen Salman Khan's case, he got relief in each case, see Lalu Yadav and others.

Now Salman says that the Black Buck died of natural causes

http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/01/27/salman-khan-claims-blackbuck-died-of-natural-causes-and-twitter/?utm_hp_ref=in-homepage

Isn't this news at least a week old and read by everyone here ?