In most months revenue share list some one sees to be crossed the minimum point limit twice.Why don't they give one more share of revenue or some percentage additionally according to the points earned?
Visit my blogs:
http://abidareacode.blogspot.com
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
Did you mean, share the money according to the points earned? Idea is good but I am not sure how the members will respond to such things as only few people can go beyond such levels and they will get the maximum
When opportunity is in front of you, don't hesitate to catch it. It will never come to you again. - Maverick
well it is a point of thinking but they most of the members who are above that level are already getting shortlisted in daily voting and comments list more often so I think single share is a good option.
It is just a suggestion, think about it.
If the share of revenue is linked to the actual points scored by the members it might lead to a decline in the share of members who figure down the list but the measure would be perfectly logical and introduce an element of healthy competition.More and more members would stay active.
Maverick,
I meant just this - those who had 5000 or more points just give 2 shares of the revenue.If it crosses 10000 points he is a hard earner and give him 10% of his share of that month extra.
There is a parallel discussion going on this topic?
http://www.boddunan.com/forums/11-general-discussions/22006-are-we-going-to-have-big-revenue-share-per-user.html?limit=15&start=45#22772
When opportunity is in front of you, don't hesitate to catch it. It will never come to you again. - Maverick
well it is a point of thinking but they most of the members who are above that level are already getting shortlisted in daily voting and comments list more often so I think single share is a good option.
It is just a suggestion, think about it.
