Sachin was named at his number four spot in the team announced to mark 150 years of the Cricketers’ Almanack


More here

image courtesy Reuters

http://mohanmekap.com/

Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
No wonder.In any cricketing event Sachin will be featured, national or international.A befitting tribute indeed.
Thank you said by: mohan manohar
No wonder.In any cricketing event Sachin will be featured, national or international.A befitting tribute indeed.
The only Indian, and from contemporary, Lara and Ponting ignored. Washim Akram is the only representation from Sachin's era.

http://mohanmekap.com/

No wonder.In any cricketing event Sachin will be featured, national or international.A befitting tribute indeed.
The only Indian, and from contemporary, Lara and Ponting ignored. Washim Akram is the only representation from Sachin's era.


Yes Wasim Akram and Brian Lara are two great luminaries.
I am not surprised at all. This man figures everywhere, be it the record books or the teams like the one announced as this one. I would have been surprised had he not figured in that list... ;)
I agree with sachin's selection but four from England are too many. They should have added Lara or Waugh in place of Grace.

I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work

https://o0.nz/

This is indeed a matter of glory not only to Sachin but entire nation.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

No wonder.In any cricketing event Sachin will be featured, national or international.A befitting tribute indeed.
The only Indian, and from contemporary, Lara and Ponting ignored. Washim Akram is the only representation from Sachin's era.


Yes Wasim Akram and Brian Lara are two great luminaries.
Brian Lara not in this list, so does Ponting is not in the list, Only Sachin and Akram form modern cricket greats in the list.

http://mohanmekap.com/

I agree with sachin's selection but four from England are too many. They should have added Lara or Waugh in place of Grace.


I agree with you . Lara should have been included.
I agree with sachin's selection but four from England are too many. They should have added Lara or Waugh in place of Grace.


I agree with you . Lara should have been included.
Brian Charles Lara should have been in the list, the problem is they are choosing from the players from 150 years of cricket, and Lara is no.3 batter means first down batsman, they have to choose between Sir Bradman, Sir Lara, and Ponting, all three are first down batter, and I think for this spot no one is comparable to Sir Don Bradman.

http://mohanmekap.com/

I agree with sachin's selection but four from England are too many. They should have added Lara or Waugh in place of Grace.


I agree with you . Lara should have been included.
Brian Charles Lara should have been in the list, the problem is they are choosing from the players from 150 years of cricket, and Lara is no.3 batter means first down batsman, they have to choose between Sir Bradman, Sir Lara, and Ponting, all three are first down batter, and I think for this spot no one is comparable to Sir Don Bradman.


Ponting should not be considered as he is unruly both on and off the ground. Cricket is not Just throwing the ball and hitting the ball. Its well known as a Gentleman's game. Ponting is not a gentleman.
You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.