Woman can't be asked to choose between career and child

In fact it is the joint duty of father and mother to keep her child.But gents had put it forcefully on ladies.

Anbul- This was a case for custody of child after divorce. The custody was given by court to mother. father would also be given chance to meet the child. Mean while, the mother got an opportunity of job in a foreign country. The father of the child asked that the mother be asked either to leave the child or the job abroad. At this the supreme court ruled that a woman can not be asked to choose between career and child.

I think its depend upon women she feel force or love . If she feel that she love that child then it will convert to love then no problem other wise it will difficult for both. I think way should be nice for both child and women. If women able to make career with child then no problem.

Actually father had revenged by making such a petition.So the court's order is very good I think.

Abid Areacode wrote:
[quote]Actually father had revenged by making such a petition.So the court's order is very good I think.[/quote]

I also think so.

ANBUl says In fact it is the joint duty of father and mother to keep her child.But gents had put it forcefully on ladies.




I am totally agree with anbul

if u are not able to continue your committed life, you should not give birth to children. I prefer guys should have kids after 3 or 4 years after their marriage. So if there is unrest in the family they can settle it out with out hurting kids feelings.

Although courts are often approached to find solutions to marital problems in most of the cases the court rulings hardly provide satisfatory ones.In this case the understanding and maturity on the part of the litigating couples can greatly help in finding an amicable solution.Sadly their decisions to involve courts are guided by ego and crude emotion.A woman can both pursue her career ends as well as discharge her motherly duties as so many thousand of women are doing it successfully.

there is a point mr mukharji. courts looks only the law not the facts. the society looks the fact and nor the law. thats it

I agree and you are absolutely correct.I was just trying to highlight this.There are some problems in our life which can not be easily solved by taking a legalistic view of things.

In matter of family disputes, courts try to bring out an amicable settlement by acting as counselor rather than law court. Only when the relations are irreparable, that court reluctantly allows divorce. The care of children is very delicate issue. Mother is considered more appropriate for small child custody.

i think they have not such broad way of thinking their toughts in most of the women

i see that anbul has answered correctly for this so i support him

the society looks the fact and nor the law. thats it