Open Means Open Means
- Boddunan.com Updates - - Announcements - - Contests & Rewards - - Group Discussions - Discussions - - General Discussions - - Improving English Writing Skills - - Q n A - Find answers to your questions - - Daily Dose - - Topics of Interest - - - Current Affairs & Latest News - - - Education & Learning - - - Humor & Jokes - - - Movies & Entertainment - Your Vote Counts - - Feedback - - Suggestion Box - Shoutbox - - Introduce Yourself - - The Lounge - - Help - - Testimonials
What is value of life?
in Topics of Interest
The insurance companies allow you to evaluate your life as high as you like, if you can pay premium. When you are paid compensation for accidental death of some family member, deceased income and extent of dependence is considered.

Should there be different valuation when cause of death is same. In case of natural death, this is no issue as life insurance is a family matter and investment decision only. But when somebody is trampled over by a vehicle, why should compensation be different and based on financial status of decease? why should compensation not be uniform and fixed by law.

For drug trial deaths, the compensation is merely Rs. 2.2 lakh. How far this is reasonable.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/drug-trial-deaths-value-of-life-only-rs-2-2-lakh-in-india/articleshow/16297696.cms

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

  • 0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    • Add Favorite Report
    Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
    When some lives are compensated either by government or insurances by some lakhs, I often think 'is human life worth some lakhs only'.
    Meera sandhu
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    It is just the policy of the insurance company and the govt.They all looks for the benefit of the company.It does not matter to them whether one's life value is just one lakh rupees.
    Sharmistha Banerjee
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    Whatever the value, this should be same for all when cause of death is same. If a car crushes somebody to death, the compensation must be same irrespective of financial status of the victim. If financial status is considered, this should be of the offender and not the victim.

    G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
    http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    I like the main theme of the post. Government and private insurance companies should definately do something regarding this matter. If we have equality before law, we should also have equality of compensation to be paid for the deceased.
    Thank you said by: Gulshan Kumar Ajmani
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    Life is very important.Life is full of achievement.Lie is not so simple to go on with it.We have to fight to reach our target.
    Sharmistha Banerjee
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    The evaluation is very useful for our family members when they lost us. The money given by insurance companies is very useful for surviving their lifes.
    http://rebacca-vethathiri.blogspot.in/
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    It is not rational to link these two kinds of deaths in deciding the quantum of compensation. For persons dying of natural causes, the value of their lives would naturally depend on how much worth they placed upon their lives in terms of insurance policies irrespective of their social or financial status. In the case of unnatural ones, I would rather advocate a method which fairly ensures a quantum which enables the surviving members to live and lead as perfectly a normal life in the absence of the deceased. To illustrate my point, the need of a victim who was a bachelor and leaving none would be vastly different from the person who left two unemployed and one marriageable daughter!!
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    Life is very precious.And just when any accident occur Govt give a compensation of 3 lakhs or 4 lakhs to the people who died.So this the amount for the life.
    Sharmistha Banerjee
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    Whatever the value, this should be same for all when cause of death is same. If a car crushes somebody to death, the compensation must be same irrespective of financial status of the victim. If financial status is considered, this should be of the offender and not the victim.


    I disagree when someone dies of a natural death his/her family members are mentally prepared and may arrange something financially to survive in future but when someone dies of a sudden death his/her family members may not be in a good condition so they may need some financial support in the starting. :blink:
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    Friends one more factor lies behind the evaluation of value of a person's life. If the person is the only source of income of the family and whole family is dependent on him, no government or insurance company can estimate the value of his life. It is the family members who knows the value. It is more than the compensation paid to them. Reason behind death comes after this.
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.
    Related Topics
    Title Category Replies
    What are the impacts of modern technology on family communication? Discussions 0
    Women should get to wear whatever they want! General Discussions 0
    Understanding What Education Is? Discussions 0
    Whose birthdate is a lucky ? General Discussions 0
    importance of skill Topics of Interest 0

    Forum Categories

    Trending Topics

    World needs expression!!
    Do you think 14 year olds should be allowed to have a job?
    Devil worship
    Best ayurvedic medicines
    DEAL WITH IT