Many people without thinking condemn the English rule over India, but one shudders to think what would have happened if the English had NOT COME to India. Hindus would continue to be ruled by Muslims and pay taxes like Jizziya etc and be second class citizens. Where would India be then in 21st century, a Muslim state ? One shudders at the possibilities in case the English had not come
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
Charter Act of 1813, says to educate one lac Indians then, though all these tend to inclined to propagate some hidden agenda but there are positives to British rule on social and economic impacts of different walks of life of Indians.
Yes. Whatever may be the. Motives behind British rule, we are benefited Without an iota of doubt especially in the introduction of English. In the IT Industry an English knowing Indian are preferred all over the world.
Yes, not only in the IT industry but touch anything it is a gift of the British from the legal system, the army, and saving of monuments like Khajuraho and much more benefitted Indians.
An important point that cannot be denied is that during Muslim rule there was no uniform legal system for all, no seats of learning, practically just the destructions of temples. It is the English who gave all that we have today.
Yes, not only in the IT industry but touch anything it is a gift of the British from the legal system, the army, and saving of monuments like Khajuraho and much more benefitted Indians.
True.Knowledge of English imparts an edge over others.
Sardar Patel the then Home minister felt the need of having United India. That's why he has merged all the Princely states in to Indian Union including Hyderabad.
An important point that cannot be denied is that during Muslim rule there was no uniform legal system for all, no seats of learning, practically just the destructions of temples. It is the English who gave all that we have today.
Here I may mention that Hindu law manusmriti is worst. Even Muslim law Sharia would be better. sharia applied equally to all but Manusmriti prescribed different punishments according to caste of offender and victim. a dalit man raping an upper caste woman would get very harsh punishment whereas rape of lower caste woman by an upper caste man would be treated leniently. The British introduced very fair legal practices. all are equal before law- milkmaid to queen. Our constitution is based on this principle of equality before law. .
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
