Why rama & sita went to forest for 14 years?

even i am surprised to knw this . i knew just that it was kaikayi who force dashradh to compel ram to go to forest for 14 yrs.

i want to share something regarding this that ram knew ravana would come and take sita so he sent sita to agnidev one day before . and the sita who was with ravana was the image of sita.so its was the hindu epics for the purpose to destroy the demons from the earth.so everything was preplanned .

Nice meean,

Thanks for recalling

See Rama is the first wife son of dhsarathan.
Barath is the 3rd wife son of dhsarathan.
3rd wife name is Kaikeyi. In earlier she got 3 boon from her husband(dhsarathan). she want to make her son as king . So she used one boon that sita and rama has to spend 14yrs of life in forest.

no pratiban . no 3 boon only 2 boon was that .
1. make bharat the king of the aayodhya.
2. send ram to the forest for 14 yr .

thanks meean must say good thread for share information . :) :) :) :) :) :)

When i was kid i watched like that rohit. Am sorry .Even i asked my mom she also told 3 boon.If possible some one please surf net and tell me clearly . Am lazy guy.

let me search.

Catch you later guys . Time for Gym.

hey pratiban serach here two boon u get answer
("http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaikeyi")

and another thing parthiban kaikeyi is the second wife of dhasarathan.. sumitra only third wife of dhasarathan

It was the curse given to dashrtha by shravan kumar parents that he will die in in sons absense, and that led to ram to go for 14 years vanvas, and kaikai was only the mediator.

Oh my god . Due to dhasarathan performance. Am cant able to remember. Thanks for correction.

ya.. rushikesh is correct.. i already read that story also.. mostly in epics for a incidenct , there may be many reason will come for an incident

I do not know the right answer but I got from one lets see what other members are posting here what they know?

Ramayana is an epic and not real history. The story was written by Valmiki. So what is written in Ramayana is the actual story. Any amendment will distort the story. However, you are free to further refine and rewrite. Then this will be Mean's and not balmiki's Ramayana.

you are right Gulshan when I was in varanasi i read 3 different Ramayana and all have different stories and I got shocked and everybody saying that they have the proof

Soubhagya- Ramayana has been written and re-written many times. There are Tulsidas' RamChrit Manas, Kadamb's Ramayana and some versions in Urdu and other languages. Raja Gopalachari also wrote in English. There are some other versions in other Asian countries. These differ. However,the epic is inspiring and entertaining. This has religious value to many.

By reading this baseless question my feelings, being a Hindu, have been hurt...

"I got a different answer from my friend ... ... ... ... ...went to forest and because of kaikayi's wish."

Harish Jharia- There was only some curiosity and so Mean's put the question. apparently, nobody intends any disrespect. We all respect or even worship Rama and Ramayana.

We Hindus are so tolerant that we do not hesitate in arguing over our deities and sometimes commenting in funny ways...

No one can dare to do this with Islamic religious figures for the fear of "Fatwas"... a world class Muslim intellectual is taking covers for saving himself from fatwa against him...

I have even been criticized by members for raising objections against an avoidable comment on the most worshiped deity of my religion... This is the reason why Hindus are not taken seriously... We are a divided lot...