Contest Thread - Pros and Cons of Indian Education system

When we speak about Education, in the Indian context all that comes to one's mind is a class room , teachers and the ultimate goal of attaining a degree. This is the drawback that makes our system lacking and incomplete. Unless Education facilitates not only learning and acquiring knowledge but also includes developing one's skills, values and personal development , a student will not be fully equipped to make a mark or become an independent thinker which quality is  equally important.

To go back in history , Indian education started with the concept of Guru Kula where the students , almost all of them coming from Brahmin and Rajput families stayed with the Guru ( Teacher) and his family living a frugal life until their education was complete. Guru was highly respected often giving advice on matters of the state to those of his students coming from Royal families and later taking on the responsibility of ruling the kingdom. There was a lot of prestige attached to the system except the fact that education was not available to all because caste factors dominated life during those periods.

But with time and western influences in the form of the Portuguese and the British education took on a different look altogether. Western education was unbiased and available to all regardless of caste ,creed and class. The spread of western education is one of the greatest gifts that we received from foreign rule. By the time India became independent education was widespread and people had realised the importance of education which gave them status and the power to earn and be independent.

The system of education in India started out with a lot of ambition. Many Indians went abroad to study law and other competetive courses during the British rule. It was through the dedicated effort of ssome progressive minds of that time that education began to evolve here . However, once we got our Independence things began to change. The government schools in the initial years were considered the best option for everyone except a very few who could afford to gain entry and study at the prestigious private schools started and nurtured by the British .

Most of the educated old timers of the forties, fifties and even sixties studied in government schools and colleges and one can see the dedication and the all round knowledge that they received.It could be because of the smaller numbers combined with the initial enthusiasm that is normally there. But over a period of time, all though education became widespread, the value and quality began to take a back seat.The growth became lo sided with politicians realising an opportunity to make education into a business venture. So, now we find a clutter of Professional colleges all over the country filled to 50% capacity.Last year more than 2 lakh seats across the country were lying vacant in Engineering colleges alone.

When I say lop sided , I refer to the total  neglect at the pre school, primary and secondary levels of education which has hardly seen any kind of push except in some private and International schools.

The standard of government schools have steadily deteriorated , inspite of the fact that more than 85% of the students still study at government run schools. I have seen many schools close down because there are no teachers willing to go to remote areas due to lack of facilities. Unless this basic need is taken care of , there will be very little development made in the education system as a  whole. If we hear or come across some achievers coming from remote areas, we have to ppreciate the individual  effort that has gone into it by the student, parents and  the teacher but not by the education department which has failed so far to provide the basic needs.

The major problem with our system of education is a lack of vision and lack of committed personnel at the right places , who are able to bring in the much needed change in the system. We see Education portfolio is more a political circus where just about anybody, depending on their proximity to the top leaders is given the post. Instead if it is given to a minister who is educated and has worked in the educational field for sometime, we may see some far reaching changes. There must be several bodies set up to monitor the system consisting of highly educated and brilliant minds that our nation has produced inspite of many lapses. But do they have the freedom to bring about  any positive changes ?

It is also a fact that our political system is at the root of all the problems that the education system faces today. There is no minimum educational qualifications laid down for contesting an election where caste,  minority issues and sycophancy play a major role. After winning the election one among the candidate who has won will be given a portfolio and if a well educated person is given the ministry of education, we must consider ourselves lucky..When such is the case it is not possible to expect any kind of improvement in the near future although some measures are taken from time to time.

No system is perfect , one can only strive harder to make it better. This is happening world over at a much faster pace than in India. We are still at the basics stage where infra structure itself is not up to the mark. So, we cannot even compare our basic school education system to any of the developed countries. Some halfhearted initiatives are taken by the respective states more to garner votes rather than improve the system. Free food and free education for lower castes and scheduled caste is one such measure. It may help to some extent but also teaches the youngsters to expect doles and freebies which definitely is not contributory.

To conclude, with all the above points where I have highlighted the negative points in our educational system , it is still considered at par with other advanced systems of the western countries. In fact there are many students who have studied in governments schools with very basic amenities but were able to do brilliantly well with regard to their academics and career . The very fact that in the United Kingdom the National Health service has more than 40% Indian doctors who have studied in India  goes to show that Indian students have the potential to compete with any society and its needs  around the world.

I am locking this thread now but will open it later for further discussion.

The tread is open for further discussion 

It is true that the condition of the government schools have drastically deteriorated in most of the parts of India. In Delhi, I have noticed that the government schools, Navodaya schools and so on are in a much better condition than in the other parts. May be because it is the capital of the country so a little more attention is given to it. I won't say that the teaching standard is very good in private schools and it is bad in government schools but yes regarding discipline and cleanliness the private schools are far better. It can be well managed if the concerned authorities put some effort but it's missing. The officials forget that school is that place where future is built up but they love to ignore this fact and students remain the looser.   

The biggest drawback of Indian education system is that this is commercialized like any other field. It is not the national interest, it is not the quality of education, it is not training every one for appropriate filed that concern the education institutes. They look more for their own commercial interests. The fee charged for education is too big for poor but meritorious students. The rich but mediocre get admission in prestigious institutions by donation. 

The remedy is that privatization must end. There should be selection of students on merit only. Entire education should be free and upto secondary level free and compulsory.  

You are right that merit should be the only criterion for getting admission in the educational institution but donation facility is pushing back the meritorious students coming from not so rich section. This is hampering the quality of the achievers also but by saying so we need to oppose against the quota system too. It's also plaguing the educational system. Thus, meritorious children from general class who do not belong to the rich class too are the worst hit which ultimately frustrate them. In India, this particular system needs to be checked as soon as possible or else upcoming teachers, doctors, professors, engineers and so on will be of substandard level.  

As long a we have caste reservations we will not be able to have merit based education . The reservations in fact extend to minorities, political sufferers and so on where anybody and everybody  becomes a sufferer and manages to get a seat. Unless the whole Indian society gets revamped the Education system will thrive and help some become super rich and the system come up with mediocre performance .

Perhaps India is the only country in the world where the government is promoting caste system right from the time we became independent. Why should they increase the limit for creamy layer to Rs 8 lac from 6 when the income tax exemption limit is much lower. Every government is playing with the rules just to catch the votes in their favor. You can't expect education standard going up with below average students having privilege over brilliant ones just because they belong to a certain caste or group. 

Absolutely, this is a major cause which is extremely harming the education system. I want to cite an instance which speaks a lot about our standard of education. Recently, my son got three out of ten in Mathematics practical paper. One sum which carried seven marks was given wrong. He asked the teacher and made her understand how he solved it. The teacher was not ready to accept it as that method was not given in the blue print of the answers. He constantly went on explaining his method and then the teacher tried to follow it, consulted other Mathematics teacher and then gave him seven more marks. Imagine if my son had not stick to his ground strongly and challenged the evaluation process then he would not have got full marks in that paper. How many students of ninth standard would have this guts to challenge the system? Finally, they will be the looser for no fault of theirs.

Shampa Sadhya wrote:

Absolutely, this is a major cause which is extremely harming the education system. I want to cite an instance which speaks a lot about our standard of education. Recently, my son got three out of ten in Mathematics practical paper. One sum which carried seven marks was given wrong. He asked the teacher and made her understand how he solved it. The teacher was not ready to accept it as that method was not given in the blue print of the answers. He constantly went on explaining his method and then the teacher tried to follow it, consulted other Mathematics teacher and then gave him seven more marks. Imagine if my son had not stick to his ground strongly and challenged the evaluation process then he would not have got full marks in that paper. How many students of ninth standard would have this guts to challenge the system? Finally, they will be the looser for no fault of theirs.

Something similar happened to my son again with Maths. While he was in PUC he had also appeared for CET . He was expecting to score 98-100% in Mathematics. But he got 90 which upset him a lot because it also counts for CET ,where for people like us without reservations ,every mark counts because it either decreases or increases your CET rank. Since he was confident about his own performance we decided to meet the university head at Bangalore. We had to apply for a re-correction process , after which  we were handed over the marks sheet which has be evaluated by the head of the dept of the respective college where he studied and if there is scope for more marks , one can apply for re-correction . They have one where you pay a nominal fee and the time taken may go up to 1 month or longer. We could not afford to take that option because the CET results were be announced in 2 weeks time after the PUC results. So we paid a higher fee which if the student scores more than 6 marks after the re correction would be refunded back  ( 85%).

The whole process of course involved in our making three trips to Bangalore which was an additional expenditure. Anyway, my son did get 9 more marks and got a rank within the first 100 in CET. But on thinking back I feel that since I was in the department it was easy for me to tackle it since it is a complicated and time consuming process, but imagine those who are unaware of it . Why dont they make the system simpler , where one can apply for re-correction at ones own university and have it done  quickly without wasting time. I am told that this is one way of making money since the number of student who apply for re-correction is very high .

usha manohar wrote:

Shampa Sadhya wrote:

Absolutely, this is a major cause which is extremely harming the education system. I want to cite an instance which speaks a lot about our standard of education. Recently, my son got three out of ten in Mathematics practical paper. One sum which carried seven marks was given wrong. He asked the teacher and made her understand how he solved it. The teacher was not ready to accept it as that method was not given in the blue print of the answers. He constantly went on explaining his method and then the teacher tried to follow it, consulted other Mathematics teacher and then gave him seven more marks. Imagine if my son had not stick to his ground strongly and challenged the evaluation process then he would not have got full marks in that paper. How many students of ninth standard would have this guts to challenge the system? Finally, they will be the looser for no fault of theirs.

Something similar happened to my son again with Maths. While he was in PUC he had also appeared for CET . He was expecting to score 98-100% in Mathematics. But he got 90 which upset him a lot because it also counts for CET ,where for people like us without reservations ,every mark counts because it either decreases or increases your CET rank. Since he was confident about his own performance we decided to meet the university head at Bangalore. We had to apply for a re-correction process , after which  we were handed over the marks sheet which has be evaluated by the head of the dept of the respective college where he studied and if there is scope for more marks , one can apply for re-correction . They have one where you pay a nominal fee and the time taken may go up to 1 month or longer. We could not afford to take that option because the CET results were be announced in 2 weeks time after the PUC results. So we paid a higher fee which if the student scores more than 6 marks after the re correction would be refunded back  ( 85%).

The whole process of course involved in our making three trips to Bangalore which was an additional expenditure. Anyway, my son did get 9 more marks and got a rank within the first 100 in CET. But on thinking back I feel that since I was in the department it was easy for me to tackle it since it is a complicated and time consuming process, but imagine those who are unaware of it . Why dont they make the system simpler , where one can apply for re-correction at ones own university and have it done  quickly without wasting time. I am told that this is one way of making money since the number of student who apply for re-correction is very high .

Your son was fortunate and got his answer sheet properly rechecked but sometimes rechecking means only re-totalling and nothing more. In such cases students loose. And, as you said it's a way of making money and this speaks a lot about our system and so how can we expect that our country will progress for the better.