Its feels very bad when some article rejected after many day of being approval.
It is because we feel happy and relax when the article is approved and when we are waiting for the money for that article to get credited, we see that the article is rejected. It feels very bad it happened to my 9 article's.

I will suggest for the benefits of we all that the decision should be taken once that the article should be accepted or not.


what do you say lovely members.

please comment!!!!!!!! :(

www.Balloob.com
I am a Coder and Blogger.
Currently pursuing my engineering degree and will be a software engineer in 2013..
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
I agree with you PANKAJ KUMAR... The decision should be taken only once that the article should be accepted or not.
Pankaj, there are many reasons for disapproval after it is approved.

1. The content may found copied
2. The content was modified and not appropriate for approval
3. The administrator feels it is not worth publishing after an editor approve it.
4. The content is not formatted properly for publishing.

And so on. So admin will reserve right to unpublish any article even if it is approved.

When opportunity is in front of you, don't hesitate to catch it. It will never come to you again. - Maverick

I agree with Maverick. But the articles should be considered approved only after finally accepted by Admin. First approval, then disapproval is odd. Hence after editor's approval only, the articles hould not be marked 'approved'. This should be after final acceptance by administration.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

The articles must be approved only after the administration is reviewed.
I agree with Pradeep. It approved only after the admin reviewed. I also feel very bad of my 2 articles.

Be positive
A writer feels disappointed when his article get rejected after a long wait.But there may be some reason as Maverick pointed out.

Visit my blogs:

http://abidareacode.blogspot.com
I think the two stage approval can be converted into single stage.
Just to clarify the things :

Editor only writes the comment as approved as you see in all your articles comments.

The status will shows as pending till the admin approves and gives cash credits.

So literally the article is not approved completely, it only accepted by editor.

Since the editor might miss out copied contents because of any reason and found by admin or for that matter any other reason admin believes the article is not eligible, he will disapprove it (ofcourse changes comment).

Disapproving already published article is something serious matter as it is done only if the article is doing harm to community (like violates terms, illegal content, copyright violation etc.)

When opportunity is in front of you, don't hesitate to catch it. It will never come to you again. - Maverick

Thanks for clarification Maverick. I suggest that in order to remove confusion, when editor approves an article, the remark should be 'Recommended' instead of 'approved'. 'Approved' should mean final acceptance.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

I think current system is good no need to change anything. Everyone know when article approve finally. When it got cash credit then its final approval. Anyway Sorry this cause may be due to my mistake .

Now i will take more care on article approval.

Santosh Kumar Singh


http://experienceofknowledge.blogspot.com/

 

You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.