G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
I have seen this earlier, happened in Germany...LOL, neither can use the car , or the TV, a smart phone etc etc... The judge should have come up with some solution so that each of them gets to keep certain items..
Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!
Judge was not wrong but the person who implement courts's decision was a foolish person.
Anyhow, this thread is intended to evoke laughter. There is nothing to be taken seriously. Here in the thread how a person tool the Judgment in a separation case literally by cutting a car etc.
rambabu wrote:Anyhow, this thread is intended to evoke laughter. There is nothing to be taken seriously. Here in the thread how a person tool the Judgment in a separation case literally by cutting a car etc.
Thanks God he have not any per animal
anil wrote:rambabu wrote:Anyhow, this thread is intended to evoke laughter. There is nothing to be taken seriously. Here in the thread how a person tool the Judgment in a separation case literally by cutting a car etc.
Thanks God he have not any per animal
That is a good one anil just imagine if they had pets like cat or dog, wonder how he would have gone about dividing that ? LOL..
Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!
usha manohar wrote:anil wrote:rambabu wrote:Anyhow, this thread is intended to evoke laughter. There is nothing to be taken seriously. Here in the thread how a person tool the Judgment in a separation case literally by cutting a car etc.
Thanks God he have not any per animal
That is a good one anil just imagine if they had pets like cat or dog, wonder how he would have gone about dividing that ? LOL..
Have you any solution of it in your mind, shoot it
He will cut the Pet animal, if he has one. Because, the concerned person carrying the Court order literally. Nothing stops him.
anil wrote:usha manohar wrote:anil wrote:rambabu wrote:Anyhow, this thread is intended to evoke laughter. There is nothing to be taken seriously. Here in the thread how a person tool the Judgment in a separation case literally by cutting a car etc.
Thanks God he have not any per animal
That is a good one anil just imagine if they had pets like cat or dog, wonder how he would have gone about dividing that ? LOL..
Have you any solution of it in your mind, shoot it
My solution would be different to that of the man ..
Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!
this is really funny but one way the husband was doing exactly what the judge said to him
bhuyali saroj
usha manohar wrote:anil wrote:usha manohar wrote:anil wrote:rambabu wrote:Anyhow, this thread is intended to evoke laughter. There is nothing to be taken seriously. Here in the thread how a person tool the Judgment in a separation case literally by cutting a car etc.
Thanks God he have not any per animal
That is a good one anil just imagine if they had pets like cat or dog, wonder how he would have gone about dividing that ? LOL..
Have you any solution of it in your mind, shoot it
My solution would be different to that of the man .. I would share the pets on time basis. If the preference of the pets could be understood, I would go by pet's preference. The pets that are more comfortable with wife would go to her and similarly others who prefer the husband.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
Page 1 of 2