He does not speak anything about corrupt practices of AAP leaders two AAP leaders and latest cash for tickets scams in their party. He is still silent on it.

He does not speak anything about corrupt practices of AAP leaders two AAP leaders and latest cash for tickets scams in their party. He is still silent on it.

He is convinced that compared to these AAP's corruption is too small a fry. And he also thought that AAP's corruption as exaggerated by the Big Masters is a figment of their imagination.

He does not speak anything about corrupt practices of AAP leaders two AAP leaders and latest cash for tickets scams in their party. He is still silent on it.

He need not speak about every party. There are many parties and AAP is not so significant. AAP is rather an amusement item for people. Just see :

http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/media-is-sold-out-on-narendra-modi-will-jail-them-arvind-kejriwal_917916.html

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140313/jsp/opinion/story_18072391.jsp#.UyKQ_D-Sxe4

Politics has been made into a dirty power play by the oldest party and now all are folloing in iys footsteps trying to overtake Congress and its misdeeds..All parties are the same hen it comes to being greedy for power..

He does not speak anything about corrupt practices of AAP leaders two AAP leaders and latest cash for tickets scams in their party. He is still silent on it.

He need not speak about every party. There are many parties and AAP is not so significant. AAP is rather an amusement item for people. Just see :

http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/media-is-sold-out-on-narendra-modi-will-jail-them-arvind-kejriwal_917916.html

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1140313/jsp/opinion/story_18072391.jsp#.UyKQ_D-Sxe4

Generally speaking we start with the Biggest corruptors first. . Regarding the press not only in India everywhere else act like pimps. It parrots the words of those who pay it most. This is a well known fact

The question is why the tainted politicians get tickets. This only goes to show 'corruption' is not really issue with people. The 'tainted' and 'corrupt' have more chances to win. Is not so, no party would give them tickets. Ao where does the fault lies? It is no use blaming politicians. Instead blame voters.

Actually people want work and they know that the 'clean and honest' are really rootless, spineless, useless and good for nothing. They have recently seen this in Delhi where the first ever goverment by 'clean and honest' Kejriwal led AAP failed to perform and quit. This is so everywhere. You may tolerate a dishonest servant who performs but will sack ther honest one who is useless and performs nothing. It is necessary to ponder why the 'corrupt and trainted' win election inspite of all adverse publicity.

The question is why the tainted politicians get tickets. This only goes to show 'corruption' is not really issue with people. The 'tainted' and 'corrupt' have more chances to win. Is not so, no party would give them tickets. Ao where does the fault lies? It is no use blaming politicians. Instead blame voters.

Actually people want work and they know that the 'clean and honest' are really rootless, spineless, useless and good for nothing. They have recently seen this in Delhi where the first ever goverment by 'clean and honest' Kejriwal led AAP failed to perform and quit. This is so everywhere. You may tolerate a dishonest servant who performs but will sack ther honest one who is useless and performs nothing. It is necessary to ponder why the 'corrupt and trainted' win election inspite of all adverse publicity.

People are aware about the "Performance" factor of the congress. That's why it has been shown the gate. The party which did nothing but harmed the people for 12 long years is not an exact definition of Performance.

The question is why the tainted politicians get tickets. This only goes to show 'corruption' is not really issue with people. The 'tainted' and 'corrupt' have more chances to win. Is not so, no party would give them tickets. Ao where does the fault lies? It is no use blaming politicians. Instead blame voters.

Actually people want work and they know that the 'clean and honest' are really rootless, spineless, useless and good for nothing. They have recently seen this in Delhi where the first ever goverment by 'clean and honest' Kejriwal led AAP failed to perform and quit. This is so everywhere. You may tolerate a dishonest servant who performs but will sack ther honest one who is useless and performs nothing. It is necessary to ponder why the 'corrupt and trainted' win election inspite of all adverse publicity.

People are aware about the "Performance" factor of the congress. That's why it has been shown the gate. The party which did nothing but harmed the people for 12 long years is not an exact definition of Performance.

For people, 'performance' is not same as 'corruption'. Congress and BJP both have given tickets to 'tainted'. There is no doubt that the said corrupt will win on tickets of Congress, BJP, DMK and AIADMK all. This is really not a party issue.

The question is why the tainted politicians get tickets. This only goes to show 'corruption' is not really issue with people. The 'tainted' and 'corrupt' have more chances to win. Is not so, no party would give them tickets. Ao where does the fault lies? It is no use blaming politicians. Instead blame voters.

Actually people want work and they know that the 'clean and honest' are really rootless, spineless, useless and good for nothing. They have recently seen this in Delhi where the first ever goverment by 'clean and honest' Kejriwal led AAP failed to perform and quit. This is so everywhere. You may tolerate a dishonest servant who performs but will sack ther honest one who is useless and performs nothing. It is necessary to ponder why the 'corrupt and trainted' win election inspite of all adverse publicity.

People are aware about the "Performance" factor of the congress. That's why it has been shown the gate. The party which did nothing but harmed the people for 12 long years is not an exact definition of Performance.

For people, 'performance' is not same as 'corruption'. Congress and BJP both have given tickets to 'tainted'. There is no doubt that the said corrupt will win on tickets of Congress, BJP, DMK and AIADMK all. This is really not a party issue.

Agreed. Corruption is not a party issue. Irrespective of the parties it's omnipresent.. But fielding a candidate by a party who's facing serious corruption charges definitely shows that party in a poor light.

The question is why the tainted politicians get tickets. This only goes to show 'corruption' is not really issue with people. The 'tainted' and 'corrupt' have more chances to win. Is not so, no party would give them tickets. Ao where does the fault lies? It is no use blaming politicians. Instead blame voters.

Actually people want work and they know that the 'clean and honest' are really rootless, spineless, useless and good for nothing. They have recently seen this in Delhi where the first ever goverment by 'clean and honest' Kejriwal led AAP failed to perform and quit. This is so everywhere. You may tolerate a dishonest servant who performs but will sack ther honest one who is useless and performs nothing. It is necessary to ponder why the 'corrupt and trainted' win election inspite of all adverse publicity.

People are aware about the "Performance" factor of the congress. That's why it has been shown the gate. The party which did nothing but harmed the people for 12 long years is not an exact definition of Performance.

For people, 'performance' is not same as 'corruption'. Congress and BJP both have given tickets to 'tainted'. There is no doubt that the said corrupt will win on tickets of Congress, BJP, DMK and AIADMK all. This is really not a party issue.

Agreed. Corruption is not a party issue. Irrespective of the parties it's omnipresent.. But fielding a candidate by a party who's facing serious corruption charges definitely shows that party in a poor light.

This shows not only the party but also voters in poor light. Why the party gives ticket to the 'corrupt'? This is because he will get votes and the 'honest' will not. Again, I may stress that the 'corrupt' really perform. The 'honest' may not even spend the local area development fund and do nothing. He will not help anyone generally. But the dishonest or corrupt will spend the local area funds and satisfy people even though he may also make some money for himself. The dishonest/ corrupt will help people to get govt. job and people will be satisfied with him and evcen pay him for his such service. In short voters are happy with candidate who helps them and unhappy with one who does nothing. corruption does not matter. In villages, liquer and other items are gifted and voters happily accept these and vote for the 'corrupt'. The corrupt voters will elect only corrupt leader.