Open Means Open Means
- Boddunan.com Updates - - Announcements - - Contests & Rewards - - Group Discussions - Discussions - - General Discussions - - Improving English Writing Skills - - Q n A - Find answers to your questions - - Daily Dose - - Topics of Interest - - - Current Affairs & Latest News - - - Education & Learning - - - Humor & Jokes - - - Movies & Entertainment - Your Vote Counts - - Feedback - - Suggestion Box - Shoutbox - - Introduce Yourself - - The Lounge - - Help - - Testimonials
What is sexist remark?
in Current Affairs & Latest News
It may be okay to disagree with a comment. But if some one frankly diwscusses certain aspect of law, is he sexist. The Samajvadi minister simply said that the harsh law on sexual harassment can lead to shrinkage of employment opportrunities. The minister may be wrong but how is his remark sexist? If we are so intolerant to free and frank discussion, this is end of freedom of expression and democracy.

http://in.news.yahoo.com/firms-afraid-to-hire-women--says-sp-leader-124426727.html?vp=1

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

  • 0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    • Add Favorite Report
    Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
    I am confused, whether it is about harshness of law against rapists or sexist remark? Both are wrong in my view. Why a strict law should not be in place for rapist in the first place and why should companies be afraid for offering the job if that is not a detering factor for women?

    I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work

    https://o0.nz/

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    I am confused, whether it is about harshness of law against rapists or sexist remark? Both are wrong in my view. Why a strict law should not be in place for rapist in the first place and why should companies be afraid for offering the job if that is not a detering factor for women?
    He is trying to convey, due to harsher laws, bosses would like to appoint male peers instead of females in order to stay out of controversy. But, he said this on the back drop of Tejpal never ending saga and also his statement, could point out that females are appointed by bosses for ..... one should always be careful while speaking, especially when in public sphere.

    http://mohanmekap.com/

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    I am confused, whether it is about harshness of law against rapists or sexist remark? Both are wrong in my view. Why a strict law should not be in place for rapist in the first place and why should companies be afraid for offering the job if that is not a detering factor for women?


    Rape is a serious matter. But even a small joke may be considered some times as sexual offence. Women can take undue advantage of this. So, it is unsafe for any employee to be any time alone with a woman. Who knows when some allegation may be made. I remember that once a woman employee made some allegation of harassment against her officer. I was also in that office. In fact, the officer had just warned her about her indifference to work and not being punctual. Then there were no strict law. Now the situation can be worse. This is just the S.P. leader talked about. He apprehends that many firms may play safe by eliminating or reducing the employment of women. you may agree or not but cannot say that the leader's remark is sexist.

    G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
    http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

    Thank you said by: mohan manohar
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    It may be okay to disagree with a comment. But if some one frankly diwscusses certain aspect of law, is he sexist. The Samajvadi minister simply said that the harsh law on sexual harassment can lead to shrinkage of employment opportrunities. The minister may be wrong but how is his remark sexist? If we are so intolerant to free and frank discussion, this is end of freedom of expression and democracy.

    http://in.news.yahoo.com/firms-afraid-to-hire-women--says-sp-leader-124426727.html?vp=1


    He said that harsh law on sexual harassment can lead to shrink employment for females. In his views what are happen with females are right one. He is a nonsense person.
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    I am confused, whether it is about harshness of law against rapists or sexist remark? Both are wrong in my view. Why a strict law should not be in place for rapist in the first place and why should companies be afraid for offering the job if that is not a detering factor for women?


    Rape is a serious matter. But even a small joke may be considered some times as sexual offence. Women can take undue advantage of this. So, it is unsafe for any employee to be any time alone with a woman. Who knows when some allegation may be made. I remember that once a woman employee made some allegation of harassment against her officer. I was also in that office. In fact, the officer had just warned her about her indifference to work and not being punctual. Then there were no strict law. Now the situation can be worse. This is just the S.P. leader talked about. He apprehends that many firms may play safe by eliminating or reducing the employment of women. you may agree or not but cannot say that the leader's remark is sexist.


    There is all kind of people in this world and that includes employees. We cannot expect all of them to play 'angels' some think they can achieve newer heights with their innovative ideas then no one an stop them. If companies think this way there is nothing wrong, they are out to run their organisation without having to go into controversies. It's not that all women do this for self gain but you can't overlook the fact both men and women take advantage of their position.

    I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work

    https://o0.nz/

    Thank you said by: Gulshan Kumar Ajmani
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    This also teaches to be alert while working, as in one such discussion, it is always better to be in good manner and also remove all weired thoughts while working with lady colleague and peers.

    http://mohanmekap.com/

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    This also teaches to be alert while working, as in one such discussion, it is always better to be in good manner and also remove all weired thoughts while working with lady colleague and peers.


    My Sutra is, "Mind your business". Be it in office or on the road.
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    It may be okay to disagree with a comment. But if some one frankly diwscusses certain aspect of law, is he sexist. The Samajvadi minister simply said that the harsh law on sexual harassment can lead to shrinkage of employment opportrunities. The minister may be wrong but how is his remark sexist? If we are so intolerant to free and frank discussion, this is end of freedom of expression and democracy.

    http://in.news.yahoo.com/firms-afraid-to-hire-women--says-sp-leader-124426727.html?vp=1


    He said that harsh law on sexual harassment can lead to shrink employment for females. In his views what are happen with females are right one. He is a nonsense person.


    Just think rationally and you will get his point. everyone wants to be safe. many concerns employ hundreds of employees or even more. With very strict law, there could be many cases of sexual harassment even on flimsy grounds. Then management would be more occupied with such cases rather than business. It is natural that this would result in shrinkage of employment for women.

    G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
    http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    It may be okay to disagree with a comment. But if some one frankly diwscusses certain aspect of law, is he sexist. The Samajvadi minister simply said that the harsh law on sexual harassment can lead to shrinkage of employment opportrunities. The minister may be wrong but how is his remark sexist? If we are so intolerant to free and frank discussion, this is end of freedom of expression and democracy.

    http://in.news.yahoo.com/firms-afraid-to-hire-women--says-sp-leader-124426727.html?vp=1


    No it is not sexist remark, Indeed in present sex is not a prohibited word. Meri Tang Bhi Sexy, it is song of Hindi film.
    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    Now Farukh Abdulla Central minister has also remarked that now men fear to talk with their women colleagues. Thus he has endorsed views of the Samajvadi leader Naresh Aggarwal.

    http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/men-are-scared-to-talk-to-women-nowadays-farooq-abdullah/article1-1159652.aspx

    G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
    http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

    0 Dislikes 0 Likes
    Report
    You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.
    Related Topics
    Title Category Replies
    What are the impacts of modern technology on family communication? Discussions 0
    Women should get to wear whatever they want! General Discussions 0
    Understanding What Education Is? Discussions 0
    Whose birthdate is a lucky ? General Discussions 0
    importance of skill Topics of Interest 0

    Forum Categories

    Trending Topics

    What are the impacts of modern technology on family communication?
    Women should get to wear whatever they want!
    India - The Country still Alive
    Understanding What Education Is?
    How Our Education System Kills Our Ability to Question?