Thanks for the comments. This post is reserved for the pro fascists and communal elements. Surprising that swadeshi is linked with Hindu as if all non Hindu were foreign. No more comments necessary. The readers would be intelligent enough to understand the true nature of this thread even without writing anything.  

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Thanks for the comments. This post is reserved for the pro fascists and communal elements. Surprising that swadeshi is linked with Hindu as if all non Hindu were foreign. No more comments necessary. The readers would be intelligent enough to understand the true nature of this thread even without writing anything.  

If you understand that there was no need to make this comment. AS it is, I have previously made it very clear that I no longer find your brand of 'nationalism' palatable and it has become completely annoying. If you have noticed, I have stopped responding to your threads and posts and the least you can do is do the same. I did not want exactly this kind of comments from you. I expect that henceforth you will keep away from this thread.

The kin of intolerance some of our members have towards anything Indian and Hindu is indeed amazing ! I guess they will happily lap up anything Mughalai and Italian !

Thanks a lot Kalyani for the link...It is a great article with lots of relevant information !

It dos not matter whether any member responds to any other member or not. But making sarcastic comments on any member or class of members is clearly undesirable and even  against norms of this site. Personally, I have not so far commented in such manner about any. I don't feel that the site and particular discussions can work this way for long.  If allowed to run this way, the site will be reduced to mouthpiece of a particular ideology. No doubt sane members will have no option but to discard the forum completely. 

Before pointing  fingers towards others it would do well to look towards self first. BEfore accusing others of trying promote a particular ideology, do not forget that it is you who has been promoting the pseudo-socialists and secular ideology and it is only after that you openly started resorting to terms such as saffron terrorists and Hindu fascists, that I have opposed strongly against use of such terms. Your views are dear to you so are ours to us. And since you do realise that forums cannot work this way, try and tone down your own opinions and language before you dish out advise to others.

Kalyani Nandurkar wrote:

Before pointing  fingers towards others it would do well to look towards self first. BEfore accusing others of trying promote a particular ideology, do not forget that it is you who has been promoting the pseudo-socialists and secular ideology and it is only after that you openly started resorting to terms such as saffron terrorists and Hindu fascists, that I have opposed strongly against use of such terms. Your views are dear to you so are ours to us. And since you do realise that forums cannot work this way, try and tone down your own opinions and language before you dish out advise to others.

It is not possible to guide any member as to what he should express and in what style. I never tell others to tone up or down their style.  I feel that any member may say what he thinks correct and also oppose others' views with proper logic and reason. But there need not be any personal comment against any one. I have always refrained from attacking any one personally. In fact, in response to some other member, I told him that all have their opinion and we have to tolerate. 

We cannot treat forum as personal domain and reserve any thread for particular brand of thought.  We are all educated and should be in a position to tolerate opposite views. Otherwise, the site will be like a crowded place where it is better to be silent than express your free views. It is against norms of any forum that certain thread is for participation by a particular school of thought only. This is what is most objectionable content of the opening post in this thread.

I have said what I needed to say. I will not further respond in this thread.   

 

It is ideas that should be shot at not the person's expressing them. There is freedom of expression which permits expression of different viewpoints. It can not be my way or highway on both sides. It is sad that individuals are being targeted in a forum which is meant for exchange of ideas. If only one school of thought has to be propagated then it is not a forum. It is pathetic to see moderator's fighting. Time administration should step in.

vijay wrote:

It is ideas that should be shot at not the person's expressing them. There is freedom of expression which permits expression of different viewpoints. It can not be my way or highway on both sides. It is sad that individuals are being targeted in a forum which is meant for exchange of ideas. If only one school of thought has to be propagated then it is not a forum. It is pathetic to see moderator's fighting. Time administration should step in.

Vijai, I had decided not to write further in this thread. But I chose to respond to you. I agree that there are bound to be different view points and these need be expressed freely without fear or prejudice. There is no fight among moderators. Just as there is intolerance in the country, so is on this forum. Just as some are interpreting nation as Hindu Rashtra' instead of its composite nature, there are such elements here also- moderator or somebody else. I have no fight with any. I also seldom see the name of member making a post. I am impersonal. I just see contents and respond without bothering even about the identity of person making the post.  I don't think adm. should interfere. As I am not fighting with any moderator, there is no fight among moderators.

Vijai, I request please go through the link and make your honest comment- palatable or not. If some view or style is unpalatable to somebody, he or she is simply immature.   

A contrbuting member cannot decide who should respond or comment. It shows lack of confidence to face alternative views. The country belongs to everyone and not to any particular school of thought. Similarly the forum belongs to everyone and no one can be barred from expressing reactions. The reason I want Admin to step in is to make policy statement regarding member's rights especially because a moderator is asking members not to respond and contesting with another moderator. Gulshanji you should not stop responding because that is what they want so that only their viewpoint sirvives .

Kalyani Nandurkar wrote:

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Thanks for the comments. This post is reserved for the pro fascists and communal elements. Surprising that swadeshi is linked with Hindu as if all non Hindu were foreign. No more comments necessary. The readers would be intelligent enough to understand the true nature of this thread even without writing anything.  

If you understand that there was no need to make this comment. AS it is, I have previously made it very clear that I no longer find your brand of 'nationalism' palatable and it has become completely annoying. If you have noticed, I have stopped responding to your threads and posts and the least you can do is do the same. I did not want exactly this kind of comments from you. I expect that henceforth you will keep away from this thread.

Gulshan ji, first thing don't associated Hindu with religion. Second thing we followers santan dharma treated all peoples as Hindu who is living in this country.

@ Kalyani it is not possible that every one is agree with our views. You also have right of disagreement. For healthy discussion always believe in it that, I may be not agree with your views but I will respect your right of speaking.