I don't know if a Caesar is more powerful than an emperor giving rise to a question if Boddunan's titles are framed by giving attention to their underlying meanings? Similarly there is feminine form of 'Emperor' which is "Empress' but here female members are accorded 'Emperor' titles which can validly be objected to by them. What do you think?

Without meaning to be disrespectful to the Emperors,Ceasars and Empresses - to me the whole idea seems ridiculous and a bit childish in a forum.A little like our political system where titles are given without gauging the performance ,just going by the numbers - you can take it anyway you like it...

I don't know if a Caesar is more powerful than an emperor giving rise to a question if Boddunan's titles are framed by giving attention to their underlying meanings? Similarly there is feminine form of 'Emperor' which is "Empress' but here female members are accorded 'Emperor' titles which can validly be objected to by them. What do you think?

Without meaning to be disrespectful to the Emperors,Ceasars and Empresses - to me the whole idea seems ridiculous and a bit childish in a forum.A little like our political system where titles are given without gauging the performance ,just going by the numbers - you can take it anyway you like it...

I am not going into the nitty gritty of criteria which are applied but looking at the meanings of them. If an emperor has qualified to be promoted to the next grade then we must find and frame an appropriate title which conveys that. Calling an empress as an emperor is just ridiculous!

I don't know if a Caesar is more powerful than an emperor giving rise to a question if Boddunan's titles are framed by giving attention to their underlying meanings? Similarly there is feminine form of 'Emperor' which is "Empress' but here female members are accorded 'Emperor' titles which can validly be objected to by them. What do you think?

Without meaning to be disrespectful to the Emperors,Ceasars and Empresses - to me the whole idea seems ridiculous and a bit childish in a forum.A little like our political system where titles are given without gauging the performance ,just going by the numbers - you can take it anyway you like it...

I agree with Chinmoy! It is also a bit ridiculous, to be honest, but then there are many members who need to have a certain title to feel good about their performances and hence it is okay! But attention must be given to the actual titles with respect to their meaning.

I don't know if a Caesar is more powerful than an emperor giving rise to a question if Boddunan's titles are framed by giving attention to their underlying meanings? Similarly there is feminine form of 'Emperor' which is "Empress' but here female members are accorded 'Emperor' titles which can validly be objected to by them. What do you think?

Without meaning to be disrespectful to the Emperors,Ceasars and Empresses - to me the whole idea seems ridiculous and a bit childish in a forum.A little like our political system where titles are given without gauging the performance ,just going by the numbers - you can take it anyway you like it...

I agree with Chinmoy! It is also a bit ridiculous, to be honest, but then there are many members who need to have a certain title to feel good about their performances and hence it is okay! But attention must be given to the actual titles with respect to their meaning.

That makes sense kalyani , some do need that kind of a push to perform better, but what needs to be looked into is whether that is encouraging a rat race for numbers where quality gets overlooked ...strictly my feelings !

I don't know if a Caesar is more powerful than an emperor giving rise to a question if Boddunan's titles are framed by giving attention to their underlying meanings? Similarly there is feminine form of 'Emperor' which is "Empress' but here female members are accorded 'Emperor' titles which can validly be objected to by them. What do you think?

Without meaning to be disrespectful to the Emperors,Ceasars and Empresses - to me the whole idea seems ridiculous and a bit childish in a forum.A little like our political system where titles are given without gauging the performance ,just going by the numbers - you can take it anyway you like it...

I agree with Chinmoy! It is also a bit ridiculous, to be honest, but then there are many members who need to have a certain title to feel good about their performances and hence it is okay! But attention must be given to the actual titles with respect to their meaning.

That's what I am stressing! To be more precise, does the creator of the title know the background of creation of the word "Caesar" which is In Germany Kaiser, in Russia 'Czar'! Julius Caesar was the Roman emperor! Now the anamoly should be clear. Whatever exotic names come to the mind should not be chosen in naming a title. That's my point!

I don't know if a Caesar is more powerful than an emperor giving rise to a question if Boddunan's titles are framed by giving attention to their underlying meanings? Similarly there is feminine form of 'Emperor' which is "Empress' but here female members are accorded 'Emperor' titles which can validly be objected to by them. What do you think?

Without meaning to be disrespectful to the Emperors,Ceasars and Empresses - to me the whole idea seems ridiculous and a bit childish in a forum.A little like our political system where titles are given without gauging the performance ,just going by the numbers - you can take it anyway you like it...

I agree with Chinmoy! It is also a bit ridiculous, to be honest, but then there are many members who need to have a certain title to feel good about their performances and hence it is okay! But attention must be given to the actual titles with respect to their meaning.

That's what I am stressing! To be more precise, does the creator of the title know the background of creation of the word "Caesar" which is In Germany Kaiser, in Russia 'Czar'! Julius Caesar was the Roman emperor! Now the anamoly should be clear. Whatever exotic names come to the mind should not be chosen in naming a title. That's my point!

I got your point exactly! It should be thought of thoroughly!

I don't know if a Caesar is more powerful than an emperor giving rise to a question if Boddunan's titles are framed by giving attention to their underlying meanings? Similarly there is feminine form of 'Emperor' which is "Empress' but here female members are accorded 'Emperor' titles which can validly be objected to by them. What do you think?

Ceemji......
I am sure, not only me but everyone here is surprised by 'Ceaser' title :cheer: as till my 14999th post, i also never imagined any title exists after Emperor :S :S
Now I am really curious to know what will be called if someone completes 20k post :cheer: :cheer: :cheer: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Suddenly I searched Wikipedia to know what's this Ceaser title mean
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesar_%28title%29
If I have interpreted it correctly, it's 'Year of the Four Emperors'. So, Caaser is more powerful.
If so, what will be season of 8 Emperors called? Any idea??? :whistle: :whistle: :whistle:

It's just a title. So, Emperor or Empress, I have no problem with the title :cheer: :cheer:
But it's sure, every person dream to see 'Emperor' or 'Ceaser' below his name. So, he will work hard to earn that title. So, giving such titles will only encourage people to participate in forum.

When I joined this site, you had just turned to a Emperor and the same moment I dreamt of becoming a Emperor as I felt, it's really a matter of pride. So, your Emperor title inspired me a lot to hard work for it.

Only thing I disagree is, even if moderators complete 10k or 15k, they can't enjoy its full happiness as that title is never shown below his name. I think, moderators should also be given titles according to the number of posts they have posted here. That's why 3 emperors here don't get this title. Am sure, everyone will agree with it.

Let me tell you one more secret. :cheer: :cheer:
I have always dreamt of seeing 'Emperor' below my profile picture. That's why I never dream of becoming a moderator :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Now, not at all :P :P :P :P
Yet I feel, Emperors and Ceasers and I don't know what's beyond that, :whistle: :whistle: :whistle: , they should always get admiration of moderators and no one should feel bad if they guide new users or point their simple mistakes. they should be given that respect at least. :woohoo: :woohoo:

Also, according to their admiration and influence any person can get Karma here. Karma is enough to show the hard work of persons here. It's sure no one can get it easy. It is beyond every boundary of any designation or post here. Just shows the value of his posts and his influence and interaction and appreciation here.

Let me tell you, I feel very happy and pleasant whenever I get a karma from Gulshanji. It prompts me to contribute many good posts here. It shows true appreciation of a person. :) :) :)

Yes I agree with chinmoy jee. In my opinion the naming must be in performance also so that they will get certain name in this site.

I don't know if a Caesar is more powerful than an emperor giving rise to a question if Boddunan's titles are framed by giving attention to their underlying meanings? Similarly there is feminine form of 'Emperor' which is "Empress' but here female members are accorded 'Emperor' titles which can validly be objected to by them. What do you think?

Ceemji......
I am sure, not only me but everyone here is surprised by 'Ceaser' title :cheer: as till my 14999th post, i also never imagined any title exists after Emperor :S :S
Now I am really curious to know what will be called if someone completes 20k post :cheer: :cheer: :cheer: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Suddenly I searched Wikipedia to know what's this Ceaser title mean
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesar_%28title%29
If I have interpreted it correctly, it's 'Year of the Four Emperors'. So, Caaser is more powerful.
If so, what will be season of 8 Emperors called? Any idea??? :whistle: :whistle: :whistle:

It's just a title. So, Emperor or Empress, I have no problem with the title :cheer: :cheer:
But it's sure, every person dream to see 'Emperor' or 'Ceaser' below his name. So, he will work hard to earn that title. So, giving such titles will only encourage people to participate in forum.

When I joined this site, you had just turned to a Emperor and the same moment I dreamt of becoming a Emperor as I felt, it's really a matter of pride. So, your Emperor title inspired me a lot to hard work for it.

Only thing I disagree is, even if moderators complete 10k or 15k, they can't enjoy its full happiness as that title is never shown below his name. I think, moderators should also be given titles according to the number of posts they have posted here. That's why 3 emperors here don't get this title. Am sure, everyone will agree with it.

Let me tell you one more secret. :cheer: :cheer:
I have always dreamt of seeing 'Emperor' below my profile picture. That's why I never dream of becoming a moderator :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Now, not at all :P :P :P :P
Yet I feel, Emperors and Ceasers and I don't know what's beyond that, :whistle: :whistle: :whistle: , they should always get admiration of moderators and no one should feel bad if they guide new users or point their simple mistakes. they should be given that respect at least. :woohoo: :woohoo:

Also, according to their admiration and influence any person can get Karma here. Karma is enough to show the hard work of persons here. It's sure no one can get it easy. It is beyond every boundary of any designation or post here. Just shows the value of his posts and his influence and interaction and appreciation here.

Let me tell you, I feel very happy and pleasant whenever I get a karma from Gulshanji. It prompts me to contribute many good posts here. It shows true appreciation of a person. :) :) :)

@Sandhya

There is absolutely nothing if someone needs motivation through winning titles but such titles should be created and named keeping all their semantic and grammatical implications. You may be happy with being an emperor,other female members may not!

Designations are not gender specific. So our head of state is Rashtrapati. This will not be rashtrapatni even if the incumbent is a woman . similarly, a woman prime Minister will not be pradhan mantrani. So, emperor on Boddunan remains so even if the member is a woman.

Emperors may be any number. But Caesar can be only one. Even if i get 15,000 or 20,000 posts, I'll not be an emperor or Caesar. will remain a moderator only.

I don't think than any woman on Boddunan will object. How can anybody object upgrading.