G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
No I am not agree with it. This site is not FB or any other social network site. How many members we are active here? Maximum 20. The only one thing which we all members have to follow that never write any thing which pinch any member personally. Religion is senstive issue, be care full when write about it.
It would not be in the wider interest of the site however we can refrain from using strong words for believers of different groups. I agree with Anil Boddunan is not a platform like FB where we can avoid each other.
I would also like the forum to remain common for all. But some members have got carried away wiith their beliefs and when they run out of defense they start shooting the messenger which is highly objectionable. Let views be exchanged not personal attacks.
I would also like the forum to remain common for all. But some members have got carried away wiith their beliefs and when they run out of defense they start shooting the messenger which is highly objectionable. Let views be exchanged not personal attacks.
@vijay Some members?
There is no necessity for dividing the Forums. What all is needed is to Just stick to expressing your opinions. No forcing. No taking the issues to personal level and above all avoiding cryptic responses, without any relevance to the discussion. Member is supposed to express his or her opinion in a clear and straight way.
bhuyali saroj
It sounds so unstatesman-like of Gulshanji!! We can as well think of forming mutually back- patting groups and sub-groups and so on to what end? Why are we shy of squaring up to the truth that some of us are terribly dogmatic.A few labor under the infallibility of their own knowledge,superiority. Partition,division, compartmentalization as means of solutions are indicative of desperation of a weak mind.We must learn to live with dissent even if that calls for use of firmness.
chinmoymukherjee wrote:It sounds so unstatesman-like of Gulshanji!! We can as well think of forming mutually back- patting groups and sub-groups and so on to what end? Why are we shy of squaring up to the truth that some of us are terribly dogmatic.A few labor under the infallibility of their own knowledge,superiority. Partition,division, compartmentalization as means of solutions are indicative of desperation of a weak mind.We must learn to live with dissent even if that calls for use of firmness.
I agree we must live with dissent. So your advice is badly needed by the person who crated controversial thread.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
If we had say 50 or 60 active members I guess one could think of having groups with the freedom to choose and also interact in any group following the rules laid down by that particular group.But as of now it is not viable to have groups here ..
Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!
Page 1 of 2