The D & L method of adjusting the parts required for a limited number now prohibits the ability of the team winning second significant advantage or disadvantage. Previously, we have cases where the hair reducing crew in a few seconds, the number of games needed to score runs is directly equal to the rate of return required by the team with a eyelash Yugoslavia. This gave the team a second eyelashes, a significant advantage because he knew he manages to earn points.

Thus, if the group with the eyelashes first accelerated in the late rounds, they lose the advantage. Now, D & L method is to adjust the legs, which are based on historical data, which is., Data collected from previous games. However, we focus on the development of the game, which is already in progress.

For example, the method of D & L, Pakistan has won an ODI against India, where the 339th game

Probably should be implemented before the mark-339 once every team has always driven more than 339, to win a match (against South Australia) in.

Moreover, the results of D & L method changed significantly in favor of groups with an eyelash Yugoslavia. This is mainly due to the sharp adjustment required an even rate a game cut or reduced. If a team is an eyelash for the second best way to win, you may suddenly face a huge task.

The D & L method is not good to use when games are abandoned due to unexpected factors such rebellious people, etc. Bat golf in the rain affected match, the team with the second eyelashes can expect to have so far to A & L is equivalent. But what happens if the game has been canceled due to unforeseen reasons. The second group is unable to predict that there will be such incidents go.

Consider also, if a team has lost, probably. For example, a group of IS200 for 8 to 32 overs, it seems pointless to allow the team to 280 runs in 50 overs, as it followed a path that has won 2, but now it rains and the game is canceled. The second group is declared the winner because it is equivalent to D & L after 32 overs. Thus, the outcome of the game has changed.

Take another example, if the method is a team that had lost in all likelihood, and is declared the winner of D & L. For example, a group of 200 for 4 in 32 overs, it seems pointless to allow the team to 280 runs in 50 overs must be because they are the drummer to follow. Even some bowlers bowling the opposition suddenly meetings well. Now it's raining and the game abandoned. The second group is declared the winner because it is equivalent to D & L after 32 overs. Thus, the outcome of the game has changed.

For example, if there is a sudden interruption or waiver by any party. The group is an eyelash first 130-overs are not lost after the 22nd game should be abandoned. The D & L is equivalent to 131 after 22 overs. But probably not 130 loss for the team with the second cap win the game disappeared, but has been reported lost.

In short, D & L method does not maintain any significant effect on the result for a team. Secondly, we must consider both the strengths of-form players. Especially given the adjustments based on historical data is not enough. It is necessary to clarify sensitive current game and current form of players and above all, should not be changed, an easily predictable early results.