Many would be shocked to hear the news that Avatar was defeated by The Hurt Locker, as The Hurt Loccker won 6 BAFTA awards, when compared to that 2 BAFTA awards by Avatar. Check the link below to see the comparison.
BAFTA awards by The Hurt Locker:
Hurt Locker won 6 BAFTA awards in the following categories
1. Best film
2. Best director
3. Best Original screenplay
4. Best editing
5. Best cinematography
6. Best Sound
BAFTA awards by AVATAR:
Avatar won 2 BAFTA awards in the following categories,
2. Best Special Visual Effects
But the battle doesn't stop here because both the films are nominated under 9 categories for Oscar.
Why "The Hurt Locker" is good
i) This film is about the story of the Bomb Squad team in Iraq.
ii) Due to securit issues, this film was short in Jordan.
iii) This film is directed by Kathryn Bigelow, who is the ex - wife of James Cameroon.
Story Line
This film clearly showcases the sufferings of the USA bomb squad team in USA and also expresses their desire to save people, in spite of the danger they face. Thomson, the bomb squad leader, dies in a bomb blast, when he tries to deactivate the bomb.
He is replaced by James, and the rest of the story deals with how he proves that he was efficient in his job to save innocent lives from bomb blast. He nearly faces death, but wins the race all the time. At the end, his schedule was over and he returns to USA.
Later he was very much worried abou the continuouis bomb blast in Iraq, and finally he returns to Iraq and continues to serve for the people. A touching film indeed. You can check the list below to find the actual reason.
to start with this movie is a out and out holocaust movie...it shows all the things the Jews had to go through during the holocaust....but the perspective is very different...the whole holocaust is shown through the eyes of a 8 year old kid,Bruno...who is innocent and is completely unaware of the whole situation in Germany...and to complicate things the father of this kid is a highly placed Nazi officer...
at the start of the movie the characters are introduced in Berlin,they are shown as a happy and self sufficient family..Bruno has friends in the locality and is very happy with his life...he also has a 12 year old sister and a very understanding and compassionate mother..his father is a very dutiful officer but is also an understanding but stern parent...soon afterwards their father breaks to them the news that they must shift to another place...Bruno is naturally very upset..now the family is shown to have shifted to their new house...there is a concentration camp nearly a mile away from their house..the boy develops curiosity regarding the concentration camp and their parents somehow manages to dodge his questions..their parents even keeps a tutor,who teaches the kids history in which Bruno is the least interested in,the only thing he is interested in is adventure...his sister however starts loving the subjects and gets addicted to the Nazi mentality and develops anti jew sentiments...Bruno soon befriends a Jewish boy of the same age who is equally innocent..and they play along the barbed wires of the camp...this friend is a friend which he never had in his life...the confusion in his mind about the teachings of his teacher,ie-all jews are bad,and they are bad for the country... and its vast difference with reality is brilliantly shown and i think is one of the strongest points in the movie....generalization is infact an offence!!
i wont divulge more facts from the plot of the movie..but i must tell u the climax is really hard hitting!!
this movie is really one of its kind..9/10
everything about the movie is perfect...(*this may contain spilers*)
1.the camera work is PERFECT..the movie lacks dialogue and uses the visual and audio mediums to express...when josh brolin first enters the scene where the multiple murder has taken place ...the scene is completely explained using visual shots..and by careful observation it can be deduced what has happened there..characters are developed by showing their actions rather than using dialogues....the visual medium is used to convey messages-when anton chigurh kills josh brolins wife,the murder is not shown..but it is clear that he killed her when he wiped his feet!
2.people say that why didnt the coens use any additional BG music for this movie...my opinion is...just to emphasise on the natural sounds they have excluded flowery BG music...and also to make the situations very very realistical...to create REAL shock in the minds of the viewers using natural sounds ..and its terrifying and shocking!
also the lack of dialogue in the movie makes the dialogues which is present much more interesting and meaningful!
3.the message of fate and chance in this movie is brilliant...everything in life depends on fate..the coin toss is a denotion of fate...listen to the dialogs more carefully u will get the message..
4.anton chigurh is a character which is compared with the best of villains in history-eg hannibal lectre,joker..etc...he is so calm and is so fucking dangerous..and feel no pain at all while killing people...that character really gives me the creeps..and the weopons he uses that vacuum thing and the shotgun with a silencer fixed are so dangerous..even when he injects himself with injections he feels pain but is unable to express it..he is so inhumane...
this movie is a 100/10 from me!!
hats off coen bros!
Director : Orson Welles
Cast : Joseph Cotten, Dolores Costello, Anne Baxter, Tim Holt, Agnes Moorehead
The Official Tagline of the movie is 'From the Man who Made "The Best Picture of 1941" '.Mentioning Not only of that year's , but considered as one of the best movies ever - Citizen Kane. After this classic, Welles made a movie based on the family values and human relationships of that era. 'The Magnificent Ambersons' is not only about the magnificence of the Ambersons but also the deterioration of their values and relationships. The story is very simple but handled with complexity such that sometimes it tends to shy away from the basic story. My problem with the movie is that it tends to be technically brilliant, great camerawork, great editing, great sets, even great acting, but the heart and soul of a movie - The story is given secondary treatment IMO. Orson Welles who is not only the director but also the narrator of the movie lacked in that aspect. Thus, you do not feel for the characters of the movie, you don't get involved in their emotional turbulence, you just are restricted to praising it's sets, camerawork, costumes and acting. Also, it might be boring for some viewers and may be considered as a substitute for sleeping pills.
Acting is a strong aspect of the movie, right from Orson Welles's best friend Joseph Cotten, to a very bright Tim Holt. From a hyper Agnes Moorehead to a restrained and graceful Dolores Costello. I would suggest this movie for viewers who view cinema as an art or who love the different aspects of film-making. But for an average movie-lover, staying away would be the option.
Rating : 6/10
Page 23 of 70