This waht Prakash Jha the film maker had to say...his new film Satyagrah is apparently based on political situation in the country and his own feeling is that we need to take democracy seriously...

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Prakash-Jhas-appeal-to-media/articleshow/22160422.cms?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral

Will our netas be happy with it - from rulers to sevaks ? :dry: :huh:

Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!

Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
This waht Prakash Jha the film maker had to say...his new film Satyagrah is apparently based on political situation in the country and his own feeling is that we need to take democracy seriously...

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Prakash-Jhas-appeal-to-media/articleshow/22160422.cms?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral

Will our netas be happy with it - from rulers to sevaks ? :dry: :huh:


Who said they are rulers. They are representative of public, they are trusty. But they are declared them self lord of public. I think no one will join politics to work as sevaks. People joined politics to remit service, not to serve.
This waht Prakash Jha the film maker had to say...his new film Satyagrah is apparently based on political situation in the country and his own feeling is that we need to take democracy seriously...

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Prakash-Jhas-appeal-to-media/articleshow/22160422.cms?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral

Will our netas be happy with it - from rulers to sevaks ? :dry: :huh:


Who said they are rulers. They are representative of public, they are trusty. But they are declared them self lord of public. I think no one will join politics to work as sevaks. People joined politics to remit service, not to serve.


Yes that is the case now..there is no patriotism at all, more goondaism, one can see to what level it goes during the election times.Only money and muscle power rules.Thats why Prakash Jha feels that the political class must be made aware of their duties to the nation..

Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!

This waht Prakash Jha the film maker had to say...his new film Satyagrah is apparently based on political situation in the country and his own feeling is that we need to take democracy seriously...

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Prakash-Jhas-appeal-to-media/articleshow/22160422.cms?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral

Will our netas be happy with it - from rulers to sevaks ? :dry: :huh:


Who said they are rulers. They are representative of public, they are trusty. But they are declared them self lord of public. I think no one will join politics to work as sevaks. People joined politics to remit service, not to serve.


Yes that is the case now..there is no patriotism at all, more goondaism, one can see to what level it goes during the election times.Only money and muscle power rules.Thats why Prakash Jha feels that the political class must be made aware of their duties to the nation..


Where we reached now, it is very hard to made aware about duties to politicians. Politicians are addict of power. Without power they will be mad. Here is Rajasthan one former minister is behind bars in famous Bhanwari scandle and his family members are playing important role in deciding future of public.
Of course how they are addressed does not really matter as long as they are able adminstrator and are taking the nation forwards which they are not....So, they need to be put in their place so they know what their duties are and what rights the citizens have..

Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!

In a Democracy, politicians and government employees are public servants, who get salaries and perks from public's contribution, therefore it would be appropriate to call them with fitting post names. That will perhaps help bring them to terms and discharge their duties as expected from them. Public is ultimate owner of this country.

I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work

https://o0.nz/

Thank you said by: Gulshan Kumar Ajmani
Already the politicians and bureaucrats are 'sevaks' (servants). They are public servants. The body selecting the officers for govt. is called 'Uniopn Public service commission'. Even now there is no word that would describe PM or any one else as 'master'. We the public appoint them as 'servants' through election.

What is there in name. They are what they are and will be what they are by any name. Gandhiji changed name of 'Achhuta' to 'Harijan' but this change helped nobody. Only constitutional and administrative measures could.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

This waht Prakash Jha the film maker had to say...his new film Satyagrah is apparently based on political situation in the country and his own feeling is that we need to take democracy seriously...

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Prakash-Jhas-appeal-to-media/articleshow/22160422.cms?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral

Will our netas be happy with it - from rulers to sevaks ? :dry: :huh:


Who said they are rulers. They are representative of public, they are trusty. But they are declared them self lord of public. I think no one will join politics to work as sevaks. People joined politics to remit service, not to serve.


Yes that is the case now..there is no patriotism at all, more goondaism, one can see to what level it goes during the election times.Only money and muscle power rules.Thats why Prakash Jha feels that the political class must be made aware of their duties to the nation..


Where we reached now, it is very hard to made aware about duties to politicians. Politicians are addict of power. Without power they will be mad. Here is Rajasthan one former minister is behind bars in famous Bhanwari scandle and his family members are playing important role in deciding future of public.


First of all, movie is pathetic... He just showed Anna movement but he was not able to potray anything at all. And like other people the movie don't come up with solution either.. Although that point of being as our sevak is correct but as mentioned in movie also, there has to be a way in which u get the work done from sevaks also..

Life is a box of Chocolate, You never know what you gonna get.... :)
www.InstantKhichri.blogspot.in
Already the politicians and bureaucrats are 'sevaks' (servants). They are public servants. The body selecting the officers for govt. is called 'Uniopn Public service commission'. Even now there is no word that would describe PM or any one else as 'master'. We the public appoint them as 'servants' through election.

What is there in name. They are what they are and will be what they are by any name. Gandhiji changed name of 'Achhuta' to 'Harijan' but this change helped nobody. Only constitutional and administrative measures could.


True- but the fact is, we select them as 'servants' but they become 'officers' with all the powers in the world on their disposal and they behave like kings.
We elect them as our 'representatives' to look after our interests but they become 'Mahamahims' to look after their own interests with public nowhere in scene.

I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work

https://o0.nz/

Already the politicians and bureaucrats are 'sevaks' (servants). They are public servants. The body selecting the officers for govt. is called 'Uniopn Public service commission'. Even now there is no word that would describe PM or any one else as 'master'. We the public appoint them as 'servants' through election.

What is there in name. They are what they are and will be what they are by any name. Gandhiji changed name of 'Achhuta' to 'Harijan' but this change helped nobody. Only constitutional and administrative measures could.


True- but the fact is, we select them as 'servants' but they become 'officers' with all the powers in the world on their disposal and they behave like kings.
We elect them as our 'representatives' to look after our interests but they become 'Mahamahims' to look after their own interests with public nowhere in scene.


Sir, 'mahamahim' (His excellency) are only President/ Governor. However President of India has stopped this practice for himself at functions. Not only leaders but public is also to blame for treating them as masters instead of representative or servant. There is lot of personality cult for which our psyche is responsible.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

It hardly matters. Even if they are addressed as Sevaks, red lights on their official cars, gleaming bungalows surrounded by lush green lawns, Black cat security guards, and the ever following officers and sychophants at their beck and call will be there. If a Sevak's status is this high, no Pradhan Sevak or Sevaks will mind if they are addressed as "Sevaks."
Thank you said by: Gulshan Kumar Ajmani
You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.