Thanks for sharing this article. It is universal truth that If patel was First PM of India than map of India will be another.

anil wrote:

Thanks for sharing this article. It is universal truth that If patel was First PM of India than map of India will be another.

so you think that Patel was better than Nehru.

Sticking topower by   or by crook istheinnate trait of Congress. This habit willbethere.Old habits die hard.

Babu saroj wrote:

anil wrote:

Thanks for sharing this article. It is universal truth that If patel was First PM of India than map of India will be another.

so you think that Patel was better than Nehru.

 

Can't say exactly. But Nehru was more popular. Again Patel lived very short. Whatever decision were taken, Nehru would be ultimately P.M. for good many years even if Patel were first P.M.  It cannot be said that Patel would longer if he were first P.M. 

Secondly, most of the article does not contain anything new. Most of the content is rumor based. 

 

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Babu saroj wrote:

anil wrote:

Thanks for sharing this article. It is universal truth that If patel was First PM of India than map of India will be another.

so you think that Patel was better than Nehru.

 

Can't say exactly. But Nehru was more popular. Again Patel lived very short. Whatever decision were taken, Nehru would be ultimately P.M. for good many years even if Patel were first P.M.  It cannot be said that Patel would longer if he were first P.M. 

Secondly, most of the article does not contain anything new. Most of the content is rumor based. 

 

Merger of Princely States is a Rumor ?

Old wine in new bottle being pedalled by usual apologists again and again. 

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Babu saroj wrote:

anil wrote:

Thanks for sharing this article. It is universal truth that If patel was First PM of India than map of India will be another.

so you think that Patel was better than Nehru.

 

Can't say exactly. But Nehru was more popular. Again Patel lived very short. Whatever decision were taken, Nehru would be ultimately P.M. for good many years even if Patel were first P.M.  It cannot be said that Patel would longer if he were first P.M. 

Secondly, most of the article does not contain anything new. Most of the content is rumor based. 

 

 

There is a saying there is no smoke without fire similarly , so called rumors have some truth on which the rumors are based. The manner in which the Nehru family has been cultivated through the years shows a single minded dedication towards making India a family ruled proposition which seemed to have succeeded to a large extent , probably due to the ignorance of the masses and clever manipulation of the concerned political leaders ..

usha manohar wrote:

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Babu saroj wrote:

anil wrote:

Thanks for sharing this article. It is universal truth that If patel was First PM of India than map of India will be another.

so you think that Patel was better than Nehru.

 

Can't say exactly. But Nehru was more popular. Again Patel lived very short. Whatever decision were taken, Nehru would be ultimately P.M. for good many years even if Patel were first P.M.  It cannot be said that Patel would longer if he were first P.M. 

Secondly, most of the article does not contain anything new. Most of the content is rumor based. 

 

 

There is a saying there is no smoke without fire similarly , so called rumors have some truth on which the rumors are based. The manner in which the Nehru family has been cultivated through the years shows a single minded dedication towards making India a family ruled proposition which seemed to have succeeded to a large extent , probably due to the ignorance of the masses and clever manipulation of the concerned political leaders ..

There are elements who would make vicious propaganda continuously and make others that there must be some truth as there is no smoke without fire. This is just technique of the rumor makers. Undoubtedly there has been continuous propaganda by fascist and saffron elements to malign the secular forces. They have spread canards against Nehru and Indira Gandhi dubbing them as 'Muslim'.  Such vicious propaganda is available on U Tube. One such  piece of propaganda is that Moti Lal Nehru's parents were Muslim and Firoz Gandhi, Indira Gandhi's husband was a Muslim even though he was Parsi. There is not only false propaganda against Nehru but this has also communal and fascist angle.  

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

usha manohar wrote:

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Babu saroj wrote:

anil wrote:

Thanks for sharing this article. It is universal truth that If patel was First PM of India than map of India will be another.

so you think that Patel was better than Nehru.

 

Can't say exactly. But Nehru was more popular. Again Patel lived very short. Whatever decision were taken, Nehru would be ultimately P.M. for good many years even if Patel were first P.M.  It cannot be said that Patel would longer if he were first P.M. 

Secondly, most of the article does not contain anything new. Most of the content is rumor based. 

 

 

There is a saying there is no smoke without fire similarly , so called rumors have some truth on which the rumors are based. The manner in which the Nehru family has been cultivated through the years shows a single minded dedication towards making India a family ruled proposition which seemed to have succeeded to a large extent , probably due to the ignorance of the masses and clever manipulation of the concerned political leaders ..

There are elements who would make vicious propaganda continuously and make others that there must be some truth as there is no smoke without fire. This is just technique of the rumor makers. Undoubtedly there has been continuous propaganda by fascist and saffron elements to malign the secular forces. They have spread canards against Nehru and Indira Gandhi dubbing them as 'Muslim'.  Such vicious propaganda is available on U Tube. One such  piece of propaganda is that Moti Lal Nehru's parents were Muslim and Firoz Gandhi, Indira Gandhi's husband was a Muslim even though he was Parsi. There is not only false propaganda against Nehru but this has also communal and fascist angle.  the

It's a Historic fact, that Patel, through Police Action,merged all the Princely States with India.There was both Smoke and Fire.

 

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

usha manohar wrote:

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Babu saroj wrote:

anil wrote:

Thanks for sharing this article. It is universal truth that If patel was First PM of India than map of India will be another.

so you think that Patel was better than Nehru.

 

Can't say exactly. But Nehru was more popular. Again Patel lived very short. Whatever decision were taken, Nehru would be ultimately P.M. for good many years even if Patel were first P.M.  It cannot be said that Patel would longer if he were first P.M. 

Secondly, most of the article does not contain anything new. Most of the content is rumor based. 

 

 

There is a saying there is no smoke without fire similarly , so called rumors have some truth on which the rumors are based. The manner in which the Nehru family has been cultivated through the years shows a single minded dedication towards making India a family ruled proposition which seemed to have succeeded to a large extent , probably due to the ignorance of the masses and clever manipulation of the concerned political leaders ..

There are elements who would make vicious propaganda continuously and make others that there must be some truth as there is no smoke without fire. This is just technique of the rumor makers. Undoubtedly there has been continuous propaganda by fascist and saffron elements to malign the secular forces. They have spread canards against Nehru and Indira Gandhi dubbing them as 'Muslim'.  Such vicious propaganda is available on U Tube. One such  piece of propaganda is that Moti Lal Nehru's parents were Muslim and Firoz Gandhi, Indira Gandhi's husband was a Muslim even though he was Parsi. There is not only false propaganda against Nehru but this has also communal and fascist angle.  

 

There is nothing vicious about Gandhis having Islamic background, how does it matter ? In fact I remember reading about this long back - that Feroze Gandhi's mother was a Parsee and  father a muslim. I doubt if it changes things since what damage the family owned business has done has already been done to this country and where does one even start to list out the misdeeds ?