Sai Baba worship- not acceptable in Hinduism- Shankaracharya

2.4K Views
0 Replies
1 min read
Undoubtedly, Shankaracharya is an authority in Hindu/ Sanatan religion. He says that Sai Baba worship is unhindu.


http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/do-not-worship-shirdi-sai-baba-says-shankaracharya/1/368207.html

Sai Baba is also believed to be of Muslim origin. But some Muslinms have asserted that they worhip only Allah and nobody else. Sai Baba issue concerns only Hindus as they only worship statues.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/allahabad/No-more-victims-Allahabad-girls-fight-their-fears/articleshow/37111312.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

However there are even self styled Gurus who get themselves worshipped. Undoubtedly, the Hindus are exploited and cheated by so many religious trusts in name of various deities and so called saints.

20 Replies

Undoubtedly, Shankaracharya is an authority in Hindu/ Sanatan religion. He says that Sai Baba worship is unhindu.


http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/do-not-worship-shirdi-sai-baba-says-shankaracharya/1/368207.html

Sai Baba is also believed to be of Muslim origin. But some Muslinms have asserted that they worhip only Allah and nobody else. Sai Baba issue concerns only Hindus as they only worship statues.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/allahabad/No-more-victims-Allahabad-girls-fight-their-fears/articleshow/37111312.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

However there are even self styled Gurus who get themselves worshipped. Undoubtedly, the Hindus are exploited and cheated by so many religious trusts in name of various deities and so called saints.


Shankaracharya says that Sai Baba is a human. Hence should not be worshipped. But Ram, one of the 10 incarnations is also Human as described in Puranas.


Religion is a set of beliefs. Ramayaa and Mahabharata are ancient Hindu books and so Rama and Krishna are very much worshipped as Vishnu- incarnate. There are some deities like Ganesh, Laxmi who are also worshipped in Sanatan Hindu tradition. On the other hand nobody knew about Sai Baba a few decades ago. The movie Amar Akbar, Antony got him publicity. Shankaracharya has just caution against worsip of Sai Baba abd other newly discovered 'gods', who are not part of Sanatan Dharama.

In fact, the worship activity is also a roaring business. The Holymenn at religious places make a lot of money by cheating devotees. This was well described in the movie 'Sangarsh'. As worship is a big business, there is a tendency to create new gods and make money therefrom. It is also possibe that traditional Hindu Sanatan Dharma faces stiff competition for new 'worship business houses' like Sai Baba and some other 'maths'.


Religion is a set of beliefs translated into commerce by certain limited sections of followers since time immemorial. Why should only they have the right to do so. As happens in commerce either they should share the earnings with others or some others will invent new gods and earn out of it. Religion ultimately is business of faith. Like all businesses it also finds new investors from time to time.


very apt comments indeed. So there is nothing sacred about religion. This is entirely business. This is more true about Hindu with so many deties or worship shops.
Religion is a lucrative business that's being smartly used by wise men to deceive the gullible.
Ram is born is some other age, and according to religious scripture in the age of Kalli Yuga only Lord Budha is associated with incarnation and this also have contradictions. Shaknaracharya said, do not use workd Ram with Sai, Incarnation is human life of Lord on earth in different forms, Lord Ram born is Dwapara age if iam right, in Kalli Yuga according to Purana whcih Shankaracharya said only Lord Buddha is associated with incarnation.
Sankaracharya said that Saibaba is human and should not be worshipped. Has he forgotten that Ram is also born as human according to Puranas ?
There are many electr4onic medias who have been giving very half news and many people never understand what the original speaker said about.
The basis for our discussions is the news item link given in the thread.
Many people are giving examples of Lord Ram in relation with sai in order to give him the place, never ever understood in his life time sai never advocated this, but now managers are making him Lord it is their business but should not use word Ram with him what Shankaracharya said about.
The name Ram was used by Sankaracharya. Not by the people.
Everybody has its own belief and in country like India which is called the biggest democratic country everyone has the right to worship whomsoever he/she wants.
Everybody has its own belief and in country like India which is called the biggest democratic country everyone has the right to worship whomsoever he/she wants.


Exactly. Why a religious Guru should dictate the beliefs and likes of others?
Everybody has its own belief and in country like India which is called the biggest democratic country everyone has the right to worship whomsoever he/she wants.
Right to religion guarantees every one to worship and respect each others but not guarantee to offend others, every religions should have some proper identity not borrowed from others.
Like marketing companies launch new products from time to time, godmen also do so from time to time. Sometimes marketing companies go to marketing wars to protect their customer base,so do godmen. See it hat way and the things will become clear. Do not take sides . Enjoy the war.
Many people are giving examples of Lord Ram in relation with sai in order to give him the place, never ever understood in his life time sai never advocated this, but now managers are making him Lord it is their business but should not use word Ram with him what Shankaracharya said about.


Shankaracharya has just enlightened us that Sai Baba worship is not part of Hindu Sanatan Dharama. He has this much of authority being shankaracharya. He has addressed those who believe in Hindu Sanatana Dharama. Others may ignore him. Personally, I worship none.
Many people are giving examples of Lord Ram in relation with sai in order to give him the place, never ever understood in his life time sai never advocated this, but now managers are making him Lord it is their business but should not use word Ram with him what Shankaracharya said about.


Shankaracharya has just enlightened us that Sai Baba worship is not part of Hindu Sanatan Dharama. He has this much of authority being shankaracharya. He has addressed those who believe in Hindu Sanatana Dharama. Others may ignore him. Personally, I worship none.


Exactly why should we get involved in their marketing wars. We can chose the product we like.
Many people are giving examples of Lord Ram in relation with sai in order to give him the place, never ever understood in his life time sai never advocated this, but now managers are making him Lord it is their business but should not use word Ram with him what Shankaracharya said about.


Shankaracharya has just enlightened us that Sai Baba worship is not part of Hindu Sanatan Dharama. He has this much of authority being shankaracharya. He has addressed those who believe in Hindu Sanatana Dharama. Others may ignore him. Personally, I worship none.[/quote

Hindu Sanatana Dharma is the most tolerant. It never said worship this god and don't worship that god.
Hinduism is a religion of absolute freedom, by which you are free to choose your path, in your own way of approaching the divine. It does not force anybody to accept particular dogmas or forms of worship. It is highly flexible and tolerant. That is why Hinduism has survived adverse situations of centuries and remains as Sanatana Dharma, the eternal religion.
Hinduism is a religion of absolute freedom, by which you are free to choose your path, in your own way of approaching the divine. It does not force anybody to accept particular dogmas or forms of worship. It is highly flexible and tolerant. That is why Hinduism has survived adverse situations of centuries and remains as Sanatana Dharma, the eternal religion.


I agree with you. It's the self styled Gurus who are playing the Spoil Sport.
I am speechless learning so many things about the uselessness of a religion. I have nothing to say but thank all of you.
Shankaracharya is a seer, with all due respect. I would say who has entrusted him with the authority of asking people whom should they believe or worship. I agree that building temples for Sai Baba or for that matter any Gods/Goddesses should be minimal. Building a place of worship doesnot prove one to be religious or doesn't guarantee blessing of various Gods. Because God is omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient.

However, the great seer should not hurt the religious sentiments of so many people. Shankaracharya says that since Sai baba is a human being and not a God, he shouldn't be worshiped. So, does he claim that he has actually witnessed a Hindu God?
Shankaracharya is not a self styled guru and not lord as sai baba follower thinks. Shankaracharya authorized to speak when laws about sanatan dharma broken. Recently puri Shankaracharya spoke devotees can not touch lord jagannatha during car festival. High court said what he speaks final on sanatan dharma.

Topic Author

Topic Stats

Created Wednesday, 25 June 2014 09:36
Last Updated Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies 0
Views 2.4K
Likes 0

Share This Topic