Sai Baba worship- not acceptable in Hinduism- Shankaracharya

2.4K Views
0 Replies
1 min read
Undoubtedly, Shankaracharya is an authority in Hindu/ Sanatan religion. He says that Sai Baba worship is unhindu.


http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/do-not-worship-shirdi-sai-baba-says-shankaracharya/1/368207.html

Sai Baba is also believed to be of Muslim origin. But some Muslinms have asserted that they worhip only Allah and nobody else. Sai Baba issue concerns only Hindus as they only worship statues.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/allahabad/No-more-victims-Allahabad-girls-fight-their-fears/articleshow/37111312.cms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=digest_section

However there are even self styled Gurus who get themselves worshipped. Undoubtedly, the Hindus are exploited and cheated by so many religious trusts in name of various deities and so called saints.

6 Replies

No sanatan dharmi would tell Ram and Krishna are humans, not proof or link not necessary as it is inculcated since birth. Other believers may say whatever does not bother sanatana dharmi. It is their business.
Well said. Let's mind our own businesses without thrusting or forcing our opinions like Sankaracharya.
No sanatan dharmi would tell Ram and Krishna are humans, not proof or link not necessary as it is inculcated since birth. Other believers may say whatever does not bother sanatana dharmi. It is their business.


Religion is based on faith and not logic. According to Hindu Sanatan Dharama, Rama and Krishna were incarnation (Avatar) of God Vishnu. Shankaracharya will naturally stick to this and guide te disciples or faithfuls in sanatan dharama accordingly. This is definitely his business. He is addressing only the faithfuls in sanatana dharama and not others. Others can just ignore.
No sanatan dharmi would tell Ram and Krishna are humans, not proof or link not necessary as it is inculcated since birth. Other believers may say whatever does not bother sanatana dharmi. It is their business.


Religion is based on faith and not logic. According to Hindu Sanatan Dharama, Rama and Krishna were incarnation (Avatar) of God Vishnu. Shankaracharya will naturally stick to this and guide te disciples or faithfuls in sanatan dharama accordingly. This is definitely his business. He is addressing only the faithfuls in sanatana dharama and not others. Others can just ignore.


Ignored and forgotten. Being in a discussion forum, people can air their views.
No sanatan dharmi would tell Ram and Krishna are humans, not proof or link not necessary as it is inculcated since birth. Other believers may say whatever does not bother sanatana dharmi. It is their business.


Religion is based on faith and not logic. According to Hindu Sanatan Dharama, Rama and Krishna were incarnation (Avatar) of God Vishnu. Shankaracharya will naturally stick to this and guide te disciples or faithfuls in sanatan dharama accordingly. This is definitely his business. He is addressing only the faithfuls in sanatana dharama and not others. Others can just ignore.


Ignored and forgotten. Being in a discussion forum, people can air their views.


Thanks. Being an atheist, I am also ignoring as he is not addressing to us (non faithfuls).

AS the topic has been discussed from all angles, let us close this. I thank all those who participated in the thread.
No sanatan dharmi would tell Ram and Krishna are humans, not proof or link not necessary as it is inculcated since birth. Other believers may say whatever does not bother sanatana dharmi. It is their business.


Religion is based on faith and not logic. According to Hindu Sanatan Dharama, Rama and Krishna were incarnation (Avatar) of God Vishnu. Shankaracharya will naturally stick to this and guide te disciples or faithfuls in sanatan dharama accordingly. This is definitely his business. He is addressing only the faithfuls in sanatana dharama and not others. Others can just ignore.


Ignored and forgotten. Being in a discussion forum, people can air their views.


Thanks. Being an atheist, I am also ignoring as he is not addressing to us (non faithfuls).

AS the topic has been discussed from all angles, let us close this. I thank all those who participated in the thread.


Please go ahead Sir. You are the better judge.

Topic Author

Topic Stats

Created Wednesday, 25 June 2014 09:36
Last Updated Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies 0
Views 2.4K
Likes 0

Share This Topic