Dalai Lama has decided to quit political role. But Are he and his disciples not playing political role by continuing in exile. Will it not be fair that he patches up with Chinese Govt. and settle in Tibet along with his disciples. He can well play his religious role by adhering to norms of a patriotic and true citizen of his country.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2011/03/10/VI2011031001517.html

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
A political heir to Dalao Lama has been appointed. Dalai Lama is still titular head and only political affairs are delegated. The heir says that he will work for Tibet freedom.

The Government in Exile of Tibet is functioning from India who recognized Chinese authority in Tibet. It is a big paradox? There appears no possibilities of Tibet returning to Dalai Lamas control in foreseeable future. Will it not be prident for Tibetan refugees in India to considering returning to their mainland and live there as responsible citizens.

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/157108/will-work-tibet-freedom-says.html

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

The Government in Exile is illegal according to China. This is obvious. The govt. in Exile functions from India who accepts Chinese sovereignty over Tibet. Thus, there is no basis for the Govt. in exile. This is unlawful by implication even according to the host country

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Tibet-exile-govt-illegal-after-vote/Article1-690663.aspx

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.