OpenMeans Forum
Welcome, Guest
Recent activity
vijay replied to the topic Farmer's suicide- Is this fashion!.
Blaming Nehru is a fashion these days. Especially by the beneficiaries.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Lowest cost smartphone at just Rs. 251..
vijay wrote:
At this rate he is going to beat the Chinese also. very high volumes, lowest cost of production and low profit per phone, but translates into huge total profit on large volume. But why is he asking for advance booking? That is what is causing doubts. Wait and watch.
Advance booking is to ensure the customer is serious in buying the product. This Advance is an affair common in all spheres of life. There is nothing to suspect or doubt.
9 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Cwar may erupt with higher castes also asking for reservations.
Even if there is army rule in India the caste system cannot be eradicated. It has entered into the DNA of ourselves. The advantages of birth by the upper castes cannot be taken away just as the disadvantages of birth into lower castes cannot be wished away. Unfortunately education has consolidated the divide instead of reducing it. Let there be a civil war perhaps that may bring some sense into our system.
9 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Reservations on Caste.
At the moment religious polarization is the name of the game. After its success caste based polarization will be carried out. All these are generally done during Chai pe charcha.
9 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Lowest cost smartphone at just Rs. 251..
At this rate he is going to beat the Chinese also. very high volumes, lowest cost of production and low profit per phone, but translates into huge total profit on large volume. But why is he asking for advance booking? That is what is causing doubts. Wait and watch.
9 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
There are people in our country who feel strongly about certain issues which go against popular sentiment. Afzal Guru's trial and hanging happens to be one of them. Because there is freedom of speech, they express themselves. Having exercised their right now others are condemning them. Till then it is OK. However when police is involved and government takes sides on hearsay the balance gets upset. Now to justify they will fabricate and use coercive methods to prove they are right. Matter is not simple as is made out.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya created new topic A Letter of Divorce Threat is Cruelty .
What's your opinion regarding the judgement given by the High Court in the case? Link is given below:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wifes-letter-talking-of-divorce-remarriage-an-act-of-cruelty-HC/articleshow/51084192.cms
I truly support the judgement. Blackmailing of any kind should not be permitted.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Did I point out specifically you ? Are you the only one who expressed such views ? What I said is my OWN opinion.
It is not about accusing anyone else or me but the point of discussion remains healthy when we try to see through what others are stating. We are bound to differ but when our opinion is written in a balanced way then only discussion becomes interesting and not authoritative.
If you have seen authority in my comment, its unfortunate. What all I know is that I expressed in a simple and clear way in a general point of view.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Is there a perfect age for marriage ?.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
One or two swallows does not make summer similarly a couple of stray cases of defiance does not mean the society has changed drastically and to think so is indeed absurd and foolish and being blind to the other side . There is some change happening but at a very slow pace but generally traditions , parental control and caste factors still play a major role in deciding on fixing a marriage in villages, small towns and even in metro towns..
Changes are taking place but in a very slow pace which will take years to change the whole society. In villages the condition is very different and the most important point is if at all some are running away from their homes when they are forced by the family is actually not a solution. It's not the desired change. Change is that which is happily acceptable to all and not the protests which may lead to a violent revenge from the family's side which usually do take place and many are not even reported or go totally unnoticed. That's a big failure of our society.
Running away from the home to escape Child marriage is a change I'm favored of. Instead of succumbing to the evils of Child Marriages, it's better to run away from the family showing discontentment towards child marriages.
Some young boys and girls do run away to avoid family pressure but I am not aware that children run away to escape child marriage. While talking about perfect age for marriage I think the child marriage should not come into consideration for discussion because it is already constitutionally illegal. Now, let me say that protest is fine if the family refrains from harsher pressure on their child but that does not happen and that's the matter of concern.
Many Constitutionally illegal Dowry system is still going on unabated. So is the Child marriage. Such things will be confined to the Rule books only. Because some girls are forced to marry at an early age both by the society and the elders of the family, these girls are running away from their family. This is a healthy sign. It shows younger lot even though they are from villages are showing the signs of emancipation. It should increase. There should be a change both in the parents and the concerned members.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Did I point out specifically you ? Are you the only one who expressed such views ? What I said is my OWN opinion.
It is not about accusing anyone else or me but the point of discussion remains healthy when we try to see through what others are stating. We are bound to differ but when our opinion is written in a balanced way then only discussion becomes interesting and not authoritative.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Lowest cost smartphone at just Rs. 251..
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
We are all curious to see that the manufacturer keep's his promise or not. It's reported in the newspaper that the police and I.T officials are visiting the manufacturer's office for some enquiry but, is it really required? If at all he fails to keep his promise then one can see a reason to enquire but why now.
There were some doubts and suspicions spread by the rival manufacturers. Mr. Goel, the official representative of the Smartphone manufacturing company Cleanly mentioned that his Ringing Bells will definitely supply the phones to every customer who registered his nams in the first phase. For more details you can see my previous thread.
I am aware about the information you shared here. I have already mentioned in my previous comment about the manufacturer's viewpoint which got published in a daily newspaper today.
I too am following the news paper pertaining to the Smartphone which is creating waves. It's very normal to hear such comments when something unusual happens. These are the days when every Smartphone costs in thousands. In such scenario a revolutionary concept will make the people frown, doubt and suspect. Now with the time, all our doubts will be cleared.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Is there a perfect age for marriage ?.
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
One or two swallows does not make summer similarly a couple of stray cases of defiance does not mean the society has changed drastically and to think so is indeed absurd and foolish and being blind to the other side . There is some change happening but at a very slow pace but generally traditions , parental control and caste factors still play a major role in deciding on fixing a marriage in villages, small towns and even in metro towns..
Changes are taking place but in a very slow pace which will take years to change the whole society. In villages the condition is very different and the most important point is if at all some are running away from their homes when they are forced by the family is actually not a solution. It's not the desired change. Change is that which is happily acceptable to all and not the protests which may lead to a violent revenge from the family's side which usually do take place and many are not even reported or go totally unnoticed. That's a big failure of our society.
Running away from the home to escape Child marriage is a change I'm favored of. Instead of succumbing to the evils of Child Marriages, it's better to run away from the family showing discontentment towards child marriages.
Some young boys and girls do run away to avoid family pressure but I am not aware that children run away to escape child marriage. While talking about perfect age for marriage I think the child marriage should not come into consideration for discussion because it is already constitutionally illegal. Now, let me say that protest is fine if the family refrains from harsher pressure on their child but that does not happen and that's the matter of concern.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Is there a perfect age for marriage ?.
MG Singh wrote:
Talking of age of marriage per se I feel there is no special age. More so in a developed society. Then there is also a biological difference in a man and a woman. Men generally do not age that much and can marry at any age. The Hollywood star Anthony Quinn( My favorite) married his secretary at 82 and fathered 2 kids. So frankly there is no age if one is socially and materially well off. India is lagging, but soon we will catch up in this field for sure.
I agree with what you said. Marriage age is purely personal. Some will not marry until they are settled in their life financially. Your Anthony Quinn example further establishes the fact that there is no specific age for marriage,
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Did I point out specifically you ? Are you the only one who expressed such views ? What I said is my OWN opinion.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Reservations on Caste.
MG Singh wrote:
The fact is that many may feel that caste reservation must be abolished, but men who hold the reins of power will never do it, so what is the solution?
There is no solution. But the evils are innumerable. Now you know well what's going on in Haryana, where Jats are agitating for reservation. And this is not the end but beginning. Country will be split in to pieces. If someone feels that caste system must be abolished that's a wishful thinking. But as you said the one who is holding the reins also cannot do anything in this regard. I don't know if he is unwilling due to helplessness or willingly allowing the age old caste system for his own benefit.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Lowest cost smartphone at just Rs. 251..
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
We are all curious to see that the manufacturer keep's his promise or not. It's reported in the newspaper that the police and I.T officials are visiting the manufacturer's office for some enquiry but, is it really required? If at all he fails to keep his promise then one can see a reason to enquire but why now.
There were some doubts and suspicions spread by the rival manufacturers. Mr. Goel, the official representative of the Smartphone manufacturing company Cleanly mentioned that his Ringing Bells will definitely supply the phones to every customer who registered his nams in the first phase. For more details you can see my previous thread.
I am aware about the information you shared here. I have already mentioned in my previous comment about the manufacturer's viewpoint which got published in a daily newspaper today.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
9 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Farmer's suicide- Is this fashion!.
Blaming Nehru is a fashion these days. Especially by the beneficiaries.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Lowest cost smartphone at just Rs. 251..
vijay wrote:
At this rate he is going to beat the Chinese also. very high volumes, lowest cost of production and low profit per phone, but translates into huge total profit on large volume. But why is he asking for advance booking? That is what is causing doubts. Wait and watch.
Advance booking is to ensure the customer is serious in buying the product. This Advance is an affair common in all spheres of life. There is nothing to suspect or doubt.
9 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Cwar may erupt with higher castes also asking for reservations.
Even if there is army rule in India the caste system cannot be eradicated. It has entered into the DNA of ourselves. The advantages of birth by the upper castes cannot be taken away just as the disadvantages of birth into lower castes cannot be wished away. Unfortunately education has consolidated the divide instead of reducing it. Let there be a civil war perhaps that may bring some sense into our system.
9 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Reservations on Caste.
At the moment religious polarization is the name of the game. After its success caste based polarization will be carried out. All these are generally done during Chai pe charcha.
9 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Lowest cost smartphone at just Rs. 251..
At this rate he is going to beat the Chinese also. very high volumes, lowest cost of production and low profit per phone, but translates into huge total profit on large volume. But why is he asking for advance booking? That is what is causing doubts. Wait and watch.
9 years ago
vijay replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
There are people in our country who feel strongly about certain issues which go against popular sentiment. Afzal Guru's trial and hanging happens to be one of them. Because there is freedom of speech, they express themselves. Having exercised their right now others are condemning them. Till then it is OK. However when police is involved and government takes sides on hearsay the balance gets upset. Now to justify they will fabricate and use coercive methods to prove they are right. Matter is not simple as is made out.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya created new topic A Letter of Divorce Threat is Cruelty .
What's your opinion regarding the judgement given by the High Court in the case? Link is given below:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wifes-letter-talking-of-divorce-remarriage-an-act-of-cruelty-HC/articleshow/51084192.cms
I truly support the judgement. Blackmailing of any kind should not be permitted.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Did I point out specifically you ? Are you the only one who expressed such views ? What I said is my OWN opinion.
It is not about accusing anyone else or me but the point of discussion remains healthy when we try to see through what others are stating. We are bound to differ but when our opinion is written in a balanced way then only discussion becomes interesting and not authoritative.
If you have seen authority in my comment, its unfortunate. What all I know is that I expressed in a simple and clear way in a general point of view.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Is there a perfect age for marriage ?.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
One or two swallows does not make summer similarly a couple of stray cases of defiance does not mean the society has changed drastically and to think so is indeed absurd and foolish and being blind to the other side . There is some change happening but at a very slow pace but generally traditions , parental control and caste factors still play a major role in deciding on fixing a marriage in villages, small towns and even in metro towns..
Changes are taking place but in a very slow pace which will take years to change the whole society. In villages the condition is very different and the most important point is if at all some are running away from their homes when they are forced by the family is actually not a solution. It's not the desired change. Change is that which is happily acceptable to all and not the protests which may lead to a violent revenge from the family's side which usually do take place and many are not even reported or go totally unnoticed. That's a big failure of our society.
Running away from the home to escape Child marriage is a change I'm favored of. Instead of succumbing to the evils of Child Marriages, it's better to run away from the family showing discontentment towards child marriages.
Some young boys and girls do run away to avoid family pressure but I am not aware that children run away to escape child marriage. While talking about perfect age for marriage I think the child marriage should not come into consideration for discussion because it is already constitutionally illegal. Now, let me say that protest is fine if the family refrains from harsher pressure on their child but that does not happen and that's the matter of concern.
Many Constitutionally illegal Dowry system is still going on unabated. So is the Child marriage. Such things will be confined to the Rule books only. Because some girls are forced to marry at an early age both by the society and the elders of the family, these girls are running away from their family. This is a healthy sign. It shows younger lot even though they are from villages are showing the signs of emancipation. It should increase. There should be a change both in the parents and the concerned members.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Did I point out specifically you ? Are you the only one who expressed such views ? What I said is my OWN opinion.
It is not about accusing anyone else or me but the point of discussion remains healthy when we try to see through what others are stating. We are bound to differ but when our opinion is written in a balanced way then only discussion becomes interesting and not authoritative.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Lowest cost smartphone at just Rs. 251..
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
We are all curious to see that the manufacturer keep's his promise or not. It's reported in the newspaper that the police and I.T officials are visiting the manufacturer's office for some enquiry but, is it really required? If at all he fails to keep his promise then one can see a reason to enquire but why now.
There were some doubts and suspicions spread by the rival manufacturers. Mr. Goel, the official representative of the Smartphone manufacturing company Cleanly mentioned that his Ringing Bells will definitely supply the phones to every customer who registered his nams in the first phase. For more details you can see my previous thread.
I am aware about the information you shared here. I have already mentioned in my previous comment about the manufacturer's viewpoint which got published in a daily newspaper today.
I too am following the news paper pertaining to the Smartphone which is creating waves. It's very normal to hear such comments when something unusual happens. These are the days when every Smartphone costs in thousands. In such scenario a revolutionary concept will make the people frown, doubt and suspect. Now with the time, all our doubts will be cleared.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Is there a perfect age for marriage ?.
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
One or two swallows does not make summer similarly a couple of stray cases of defiance does not mean the society has changed drastically and to think so is indeed absurd and foolish and being blind to the other side . There is some change happening but at a very slow pace but generally traditions , parental control and caste factors still play a major role in deciding on fixing a marriage in villages, small towns and even in metro towns..
Changes are taking place but in a very slow pace which will take years to change the whole society. In villages the condition is very different and the most important point is if at all some are running away from their homes when they are forced by the family is actually not a solution. It's not the desired change. Change is that which is happily acceptable to all and not the protests which may lead to a violent revenge from the family's side which usually do take place and many are not even reported or go totally unnoticed. That's a big failure of our society.
Running away from the home to escape Child marriage is a change I'm favored of. Instead of succumbing to the evils of Child Marriages, it's better to run away from the family showing discontentment towards child marriages.
Some young boys and girls do run away to avoid family pressure but I am not aware that children run away to escape child marriage. While talking about perfect age for marriage I think the child marriage should not come into consideration for discussion because it is already constitutionally illegal. Now, let me say that protest is fine if the family refrains from harsher pressure on their child but that does not happen and that's the matter of concern.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Is there a perfect age for marriage ?.
MG Singh wrote:
Talking of age of marriage per se I feel there is no special age. More so in a developed society. Then there is also a biological difference in a man and a woman. Men generally do not age that much and can marry at any age. The Hollywood star Anthony Quinn( My favorite) married his secretary at 82 and fathered 2 kids. So frankly there is no age if one is socially and materially well off. India is lagging, but soon we will catch up in this field for sure.
I agree with what you said. Marriage age is purely personal. Some will not marry until they are settled in their life financially. Your Anthony Quinn example further establishes the fact that there is no specific age for marriage,
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Did I point out specifically you ? Are you the only one who expressed such views ? What I said is my OWN opinion.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Reservations on Caste.
MG Singh wrote:
The fact is that many may feel that caste reservation must be abolished, but men who hold the reins of power will never do it, so what is the solution?
There is no solution. But the evils are innumerable. Now you know well what's going on in Haryana, where Jats are agitating for reservation. And this is not the end but beginning. Country will be split in to pieces. If someone feels that caste system must be abolished that's a wishful thinking. But as you said the one who is holding the reins also cannot do anything in this regard. I don't know if he is unwilling due to helplessness or willingly allowing the age old caste system for his own benefit.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Lowest cost smartphone at just Rs. 251..
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
We are all curious to see that the manufacturer keep's his promise or not. It's reported in the newspaper that the police and I.T officials are visiting the manufacturer's office for some enquiry but, is it really required? If at all he fails to keep his promise then one can see a reason to enquire but why now.
There were some doubts and suspicions spread by the rival manufacturers. Mr. Goel, the official representative of the Smartphone manufacturing company Cleanly mentioned that his Ringing Bells will definitely supply the phones to every customer who registered his nams in the first phase. For more details you can see my previous thread.
I am aware about the information you shared here. I have already mentioned in my previous comment about the manufacturer's viewpoint which got published in a daily newspaper today.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
9 years ago