OpenMeans Forum
Welcome, Guest
Recent activity
rambabu liked a reply to the topic Some minor mistakes that changed the course of history...
9 years ago
Jincy Aby liked a reply to the topic Symptoms and early signs of cancer - a checklist !.
9 years ago
Jincy Aby liked the topic Symptoms and early signs of cancer - a checklist !.
No matter how much information we have, it is still not enough where Cancer is concerned..In this article early symptoms that can lead to cancer has been discussed by the author, quite a helpful article ! Many a times we tend to pass of certain symptom as normal wear and tear of the body or as infection, which may not be the case
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Cancer-The-signs-and-symptoms-of-the-UKs-most-common-forms-of-the-disease/articleshow/51265371.cms?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=TOI
9 years ago
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Prominent North East leader Sangma dies.
It is loss of whole country, but North East lose much.
9 years ago
MG Singh replied to the topic Minority ( Islam Christian) do not wish to be ruled by Hindus. They still have grandiose dreams of Muslim rule and British rule when chirtiisns had a free run.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
There is no evidence of the contents of the thread. Muslim rulers did not force sharia on Hindus and British did not force Christianity. Most of the conversions to Islam are Christianity are because of ill treatment to lower castes treating them as very inferior even less than animals. There are many contradiction in Hindu. This came to surface recently in the controversy of Durga Goddess V/s Mahisasur. It will be better that vices like caste discrimination, dowry be first rectified. India is a secular nation and will never be either Islamic or Hindu. Nepal has removed the status of official religion so far given to Hindu. It is learnt that Bangladesh is also going to abolish the status of official religion presently accorded to Islam.
We are both senior officers and must present truth. The way you have stated that Bangladesh is about to abolish Islamic state. This is not true as presently only a case is being heard in the Bangla supreme court.
You have not been to Dacca( just presuming), but I have as the executive director after my relase. This will not happen as in that case Saudi Arabia will stop all funding to Bangladesh and they give a lot of money. Secondly 90% of the population is Muslim and Muslim organizations will not accept it.
If it happpens then I will eat crow and fly to Agra and share a beer with you.
The other part of your comments are replied below
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Final war- BJP leader/ union minister provokes .
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
MG Singh wrote:
Gulshanji, yesterday I returned from Abu Dhabi after a month. There are muslims, christians and Hindus there. There is however no comunial tension. As the hindus Christians accept suzerianity of Islam. But inIndia we always talk of comunial tension becuse majority communuty in India does not matter and minority is more important. Kindly think about it.
Minority does not enjoy any privilege in India. There are some concessions for scheduled castes (as long as they are Hindu) and scheduled tribes. There is need for fair treatment to all irrespective of religion. The narrow minded saffron brigade has distorted version of History, nation and nationalism and they are spoiling the environment. This is what needs be resisted. There is no reason why minorities accept the hegemony of majority. India is a large nation and the minorities are in fact majority in many reasons. In such scenario, the inclination to force so called Hindu Rashtra concept is really sure way to divide the nation, which is truly an act of sedition. Secularism is the only way and any deviation from this is anti nationalism.
Gulshan ji@ What is happening at this time, now it time to declare it unbailable crime to speak any rubbish words for any cast and religion. You may be write that minority does not enjoy any privilege, i am writing what I listen and read. Here one education Institute is Khalsa collage and school. It is belong to Sikh community. In these school and collage it is not possible to nominate are appoint any non Sikh as principal. They claim that these are minority institute and we can appoint a Sikh as principal, who is junior one. Population of community which more than one nation how they are minor. Here in India person of one religion is minor in one state is majority in other state.
9 years ago
Jincy Aby replied to the topic An Interesting Read For everyone....
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
It is fallacious to say that India was occupied ever by Muslims or Christians. There was never any attack by 'Muslim' on 'Hindu'. Muslims as such never attacked, In fact, the so called Muslim rulers fought even against each other. There were many dynasties like Ghulam, Suri, Tughlak, Khilji that ruled time to time. The 'Muslim' rulers had 'Hindu' ministers and vice versa. Also the British, Dutch, French- all even fought against each other. The entire history is war between kings and Kulaks. The religion of the ruler does not matter so much. Just as Muslim rulers employed Hindu Ministers, the Hindus also employed Muslim. Religion has nothing to do with rule. Maharaja Ranjit Singh was a Sikh but he employed French (Christian) as military advisers.
There is one more thing to consider. The quality like compassion and cruelty are not related to religion. These are racial. The Pathans and Baluch are considered cruel. Hence you may say Muslims are cruel. This is fallacy. The Arabs, Pathans and Baluchs have gther distinct traits and it matters little what their religion is. a Punjabi Hindu has more in common with Punjabi Muslim than what a Punjabi Muslim has with Baluch Muslim. A Hindu Assamese has more in common with Muslim Assamese than what A Hindu Behari has with Hindu Assamese.
Unless you stop looking at everything from narrow religious angle, you will always have a distorted version of everything. Better think Indian and be true nationalist or patriot.
I agree with you. During that time, the rulers were fighting each other for expanding their kingdom. There were no discrimination on the basis of religion. The aim of each king was to invade more places. All kingdoms had powerful militants and the success of each dynasty was on the basis of the strength of these militants.
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani replied to the topic Minority ( Islam Christian) do not wish to be ruled by Hindus. They still have grandiose dreams of Muslim rule and British rule when chirtiisns had a free run.
Kalyani Nandurkar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
There is no evidence of the contents of the thread. Muslim rulers did not force sharia on Hindus and British did not force Christianity. Most of the conversions to Islam are Christianity are because of ill treatment to lower castes treating them as very inferior even less than animals. There are many contradiction in Hindu. This came to surface recently in the controversy of Durga Goddess V/s Mahisasur. It will be better that vices like caste discrimination, dowry be first rectified. India is a secular nation and will never be either Islamic or Hindu. Nepal has removed the status of official religion so far given to Hindu. It is learnt that Bangladesh is also going to abolish the status of official religion presently accorded to Islam.
British did not force Christianity and Muslims did not force Hindus to convert? Which history fif you learn incidentally? How and why are you trying to deny what really happened? Aren't you aware the manner in which Hindus were tortured, killed and cut into pieces by Muslims when they denied conversion? British threw pieces of meats down water wells and resorted to numerous other tactics to force Christianity. How can you people deny true facts? Let Bangladesh abolish whatever it wants to. Why don't you go and cry yourself hoarse in Kashmir your thoughts of patriotism, in an Indian state where domestic advertisements all feature Pakistani establishments and Hindus are scared of talking about them. Go there and take Vijay along with you! It is because of people like you who deny our rightful history, that others have to now actively advocate rights of Hinduism.
There is narration of some atrocities by Aurangzeb. But there is not much about Muslim rulers. The British- especially after 1857 when British queen took over- there was rule of law. British govt. did nothing for converting people to Christianity. That is why most of us are not Christians. In the North East people were illiterate. In the process of education and social service by Christian missionaries, they became Christians. Before that, they were not Hindus but just had their own peculiar tribal deities. We can't accuse entire Muslim period rulers and British government for conversion. Most of the conversion are from Tribal who have really been civilized by Christian missionaries. The dalits have never been treated even as human by the Hindu upper classes. naturally, many changed to Christianity of Muslim. why accuse Muslims and Christians for that.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
At present he is basking in the immense attention he has received suddenly so he may find it difficult to handle himself with maturity. Thus, it's too early to predict.
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar replied to the topic An Interesting Read For everyone....
chinmoymukherjee wrote:
If poverty of your arguments makes you a loner why dub the majority as 'fascist'! What do you think friends? This is the first time I come across such horrible mindsets. The majority,if there is one at all, are
being unfairly accused of running a sister outfit of RSS! This is the quality of tolerance of our erudite member! We get regular,at times grindingly boring,lectures and sermons on the virtue of pluralism from him.Physian,heal thyself!!
You know Chinmoy this is not the first time such accusations and poor arguments been proclaimed by the esteemed member. He has been known to be very abruptly dismissive of our fine history and culture and has made fun quite a number of times. This is the reason for my recent outburst in another thread. Have you also read in another thread how no one has forced Hindus in conversion ever? NOt the first time we have been labelled as fascists, while they fail to recognise themselves as one of a persistent kind over and over again!
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani replied to the topic An Interesting Read For everyone....
chinmoymukherjee wrote:
If poverty of your arguments makes you a loner why dub the majority as 'fascist'! What do you think friends? This is the first time I come across such horrible mindsets. The majority,if there is one at all, are
being unfairly accused of running a sister outfit of RSS! This is the quality of tolerance of our erudite member! We get regular,at times grindingly boring,lectures and sermons on the virtue of pluralism from him.Physian,heal thyself!!
Chinmoy, you are one of the oldest members here and I respect you for clarity of thoughts and powerful expression. There is bound to be diversity of views and we need respect this. One member complained that again and again some are writing the same sort of stuff. If some give even hint of pushing minority to secondary position, their views is to be resisted- even if they have massive majority. Majority has no right to oppress. This desire to suppress minority is nothing but fascism. You have to call spade a spade.
I don't complain about any type of views. But others also can definitely put their viewpoint. I repeat that if only a particular view point- namely that of so called Hindutva or Hindu nation- prevails, this site will be reduced to a branch of RSS like Bajarang Dal. Happily this is not the position at present.
As regards tolerance, I am tolerant. May be some others- I may call them pseudo nationalists- cannot digest contrary opinion. But this is not my problem.
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar said thank you to chinmoymukherjee for his/her reply to the topic An Interesting Read For everyone....
If poverty of your arguments makes you a loner why dub the majority as 'fascist'! What do you think friends? This is the first time I come across such horrible mindsets. The majority,if there is one at all, are
being unfairly accused of running a sister outfit of RSS! This is the quality of tolerance of our erudite member! We get regular,at times grindingly boring,lectures and sermons on the virtue of pluralism from him.Physian,heal thyself!!
9 years ago
rambabu liked a reply to the topic Some minor mistakes that changed the course of history...
9 years ago
Jincy Aby liked a reply to the topic Symptoms and early signs of cancer - a checklist !.
9 years ago
Jincy Aby liked the topic Symptoms and early signs of cancer - a checklist !.
No matter how much information we have, it is still not enough where Cancer is concerned..In this article early symptoms that can lead to cancer has been discussed by the author, quite a helpful article ! Many a times we tend to pass of certain symptom as normal wear and tear of the body or as infection, which may not be the case
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/Cancer-The-signs-and-symptoms-of-the-UKs-most-common-forms-of-the-disease/articleshow/51265371.cms?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=TOI
9 years ago
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Prominent North East leader Sangma dies.
It is loss of whole country, but North East lose much.
9 years ago
MG Singh replied to the topic Minority ( Islam Christian) do not wish to be ruled by Hindus. They still have grandiose dreams of Muslim rule and British rule when chirtiisns had a free run.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
There is no evidence of the contents of the thread. Muslim rulers did not force sharia on Hindus and British did not force Christianity. Most of the conversions to Islam are Christianity are because of ill treatment to lower castes treating them as very inferior even less than animals. There are many contradiction in Hindu. This came to surface recently in the controversy of Durga Goddess V/s Mahisasur. It will be better that vices like caste discrimination, dowry be first rectified. India is a secular nation and will never be either Islamic or Hindu. Nepal has removed the status of official religion so far given to Hindu. It is learnt that Bangladesh is also going to abolish the status of official religion presently accorded to Islam.
We are both senior officers and must present truth. The way you have stated that Bangladesh is about to abolish Islamic state. This is not true as presently only a case is being heard in the Bangla supreme court.
You have not been to Dacca( just presuming), but I have as the executive director after my relase. This will not happen as in that case Saudi Arabia will stop all funding to Bangladesh and they give a lot of money. Secondly 90% of the population is Muslim and Muslim organizations will not accept it.
If it happpens then I will eat crow and fly to Agra and share a beer with you.
The other part of your comments are replied below
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Final war- BJP leader/ union minister provokes .
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
MG Singh wrote:
Gulshanji, yesterday I returned from Abu Dhabi after a month. There are muslims, christians and Hindus there. There is however no comunial tension. As the hindus Christians accept suzerianity of Islam. But inIndia we always talk of comunial tension becuse majority communuty in India does not matter and minority is more important. Kindly think about it.
Minority does not enjoy any privilege in India. There are some concessions for scheduled castes (as long as they are Hindu) and scheduled tribes. There is need for fair treatment to all irrespective of religion. The narrow minded saffron brigade has distorted version of History, nation and nationalism and they are spoiling the environment. This is what needs be resisted. There is no reason why minorities accept the hegemony of majority. India is a large nation and the minorities are in fact majority in many reasons. In such scenario, the inclination to force so called Hindu Rashtra concept is really sure way to divide the nation, which is truly an act of sedition. Secularism is the only way and any deviation from this is anti nationalism.
Gulshan ji@ What is happening at this time, now it time to declare it unbailable crime to speak any rubbish words for any cast and religion. You may be write that minority does not enjoy any privilege, i am writing what I listen and read. Here one education Institute is Khalsa collage and school. It is belong to Sikh community. In these school and collage it is not possible to nominate are appoint any non Sikh as principal. They claim that these are minority institute and we can appoint a Sikh as principal, who is junior one. Population of community which more than one nation how they are minor. Here in India person of one religion is minor in one state is majority in other state.
9 years ago
Jincy Aby replied to the topic An Interesting Read For everyone....
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
It is fallacious to say that India was occupied ever by Muslims or Christians. There was never any attack by 'Muslim' on 'Hindu'. Muslims as such never attacked, In fact, the so called Muslim rulers fought even against each other. There were many dynasties like Ghulam, Suri, Tughlak, Khilji that ruled time to time. The 'Muslim' rulers had 'Hindu' ministers and vice versa. Also the British, Dutch, French- all even fought against each other. The entire history is war between kings and Kulaks. The religion of the ruler does not matter so much. Just as Muslim rulers employed Hindu Ministers, the Hindus also employed Muslim. Religion has nothing to do with rule. Maharaja Ranjit Singh was a Sikh but he employed French (Christian) as military advisers.
There is one more thing to consider. The quality like compassion and cruelty are not related to religion. These are racial. The Pathans and Baluch are considered cruel. Hence you may say Muslims are cruel. This is fallacy. The Arabs, Pathans and Baluchs have gther distinct traits and it matters little what their religion is. a Punjabi Hindu has more in common with Punjabi Muslim than what a Punjabi Muslim has with Baluch Muslim. A Hindu Assamese has more in common with Muslim Assamese than what A Hindu Behari has with Hindu Assamese.
Unless you stop looking at everything from narrow religious angle, you will always have a distorted version of everything. Better think Indian and be true nationalist or patriot.
I agree with you. During that time, the rulers were fighting each other for expanding their kingdom. There were no discrimination on the basis of religion. The aim of each king was to invade more places. All kingdoms had powerful militants and the success of each dynasty was on the basis of the strength of these militants.
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani replied to the topic Minority ( Islam Christian) do not wish to be ruled by Hindus. They still have grandiose dreams of Muslim rule and British rule when chirtiisns had a free run.
Kalyani Nandurkar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
There is no evidence of the contents of the thread. Muslim rulers did not force sharia on Hindus and British did not force Christianity. Most of the conversions to Islam are Christianity are because of ill treatment to lower castes treating them as very inferior even less than animals. There are many contradiction in Hindu. This came to surface recently in the controversy of Durga Goddess V/s Mahisasur. It will be better that vices like caste discrimination, dowry be first rectified. India is a secular nation and will never be either Islamic or Hindu. Nepal has removed the status of official religion so far given to Hindu. It is learnt that Bangladesh is also going to abolish the status of official religion presently accorded to Islam.
British did not force Christianity and Muslims did not force Hindus to convert? Which history fif you learn incidentally? How and why are you trying to deny what really happened? Aren't you aware the manner in which Hindus were tortured, killed and cut into pieces by Muslims when they denied conversion? British threw pieces of meats down water wells and resorted to numerous other tactics to force Christianity. How can you people deny true facts? Let Bangladesh abolish whatever it wants to. Why don't you go and cry yourself hoarse in Kashmir your thoughts of patriotism, in an Indian state where domestic advertisements all feature Pakistani establishments and Hindus are scared of talking about them. Go there and take Vijay along with you! It is because of people like you who deny our rightful history, that others have to now actively advocate rights of Hinduism.
There is narration of some atrocities by Aurangzeb. But there is not much about Muslim rulers. The British- especially after 1857 when British queen took over- there was rule of law. British govt. did nothing for converting people to Christianity. That is why most of us are not Christians. In the North East people were illiterate. In the process of education and social service by Christian missionaries, they became Christians. Before that, they were not Hindus but just had their own peculiar tribal deities. We can't accuse entire Muslim period rulers and British government for conversion. Most of the conversion are from Tribal who have really been civilized by Christian missionaries. The dalits have never been treated even as human by the Hindu upper classes. naturally, many changed to Christianity of Muslim. why accuse Muslims and Christians for that.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
At present he is basking in the immense attention he has received suddenly so he may find it difficult to handle himself with maturity. Thus, it's too early to predict.
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar replied to the topic An Interesting Read For everyone....
chinmoymukherjee wrote:
If poverty of your arguments makes you a loner why dub the majority as 'fascist'! What do you think friends? This is the first time I come across such horrible mindsets. The majority,if there is one at all, are
being unfairly accused of running a sister outfit of RSS! This is the quality of tolerance of our erudite member! We get regular,at times grindingly boring,lectures and sermons on the virtue of pluralism from him.Physian,heal thyself!!
You know Chinmoy this is not the first time such accusations and poor arguments been proclaimed by the esteemed member. He has been known to be very abruptly dismissive of our fine history and culture and has made fun quite a number of times. This is the reason for my recent outburst in another thread. Have you also read in another thread how no one has forced Hindus in conversion ever? NOt the first time we have been labelled as fascists, while they fail to recognise themselves as one of a persistent kind over and over again!
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani replied to the topic An Interesting Read For everyone....
chinmoymukherjee wrote:
If poverty of your arguments makes you a loner why dub the majority as 'fascist'! What do you think friends? This is the first time I come across such horrible mindsets. The majority,if there is one at all, are
being unfairly accused of running a sister outfit of RSS! This is the quality of tolerance of our erudite member! We get regular,at times grindingly boring,lectures and sermons on the virtue of pluralism from him.Physian,heal thyself!!
Chinmoy, you are one of the oldest members here and I respect you for clarity of thoughts and powerful expression. There is bound to be diversity of views and we need respect this. One member complained that again and again some are writing the same sort of stuff. If some give even hint of pushing minority to secondary position, their views is to be resisted- even if they have massive majority. Majority has no right to oppress. This desire to suppress minority is nothing but fascism. You have to call spade a spade.
I don't complain about any type of views. But others also can definitely put their viewpoint. I repeat that if only a particular view point- namely that of so called Hindutva or Hindu nation- prevails, this site will be reduced to a branch of RSS like Bajarang Dal. Happily this is not the position at present.
As regards tolerance, I am tolerant. May be some others- I may call them pseudo nationalists- cannot digest contrary opinion. But this is not my problem.
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar said thank you to chinmoymukherjee for his/her reply to the topic An Interesting Read For everyone....
If poverty of your arguments makes you a loner why dub the majority as 'fascist'! What do you think friends? This is the first time I come across such horrible mindsets. The majority,if there is one at all, are
being unfairly accused of running a sister outfit of RSS! This is the quality of tolerance of our erudite member! We get regular,at times grindingly boring,lectures and sermons on the virtue of pluralism from him.Physian,heal thyself!!
9 years ago